Feasibility Frontier—A Method for Aligning Competitive Strategy with the Choice of IT Architectures

This article introduces an approach that addresses the challenge of aligning choices about IT architecture with the strategic goals of a corporation. This takes the form of a framework that captures how managers make IT architecture choices and how those choices impact an organization's competitive position. Based on microeconomic theory, the framework provides a set of conceptualizations for understanding alignment, plus some recommendations on how organizations should approach IT architecture adoption in a way that assures optimal alignment with strategic goals. The most important facilitating factor for the framework is the commitment to complete, accurate, and unbiased cost and quality assessment of business processes and their supporting IT infrastructure.

[1]  Daniel Beimborn,et al.  Strategy Matters: The Role of Strategy Type for IT Business Value , 2006, AMCIS.

[2]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  The linkage between IOS use and competitive action: a competitive dynamics perspective , 2007, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[3]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[4]  A. Stuart,et al.  Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments , 1959 .

[5]  Jochen Franke,et al.  The Role of Information Technology Business Alignment in Value Creation: A Multiple Case Study among German Banks , 2005, ICIS.

[6]  M. Porter The five competitive forces that shape strategy. , 2008, Harvard business review.

[7]  E. Mansfield,et al.  Microeconomics: Theory and Applications , 1976 .

[8]  Gezinus J. Hidding,et al.  Sustaining strategic IT advantage in the information age: how strategy paradigms differ by speed , 2001, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Factors affecting information systems planning effectiveness: organizational contexts and planning systems dimensions , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[10]  Peter Weill,et al.  A matrixed approach to designind it governance , 2005 .

[11]  Paul H. Cheney,et al.  Organizational Factors Affecting the Success of End-User Computing , 1986, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[13]  Donald P. Ballou,et al.  Modeling Data and Process Quality in Multi-Input, Multi-Output Information Systems , 1985 .

[14]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Beyond the productivity paradox , 1998, CACM.

[16]  A. Rangaswamy,et al.  Technological Opportunism and Radical Technology Adoption: An Application to E-Business , 2002 .

[17]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[18]  Shahid A. Zia,et al.  Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries & Competitors , 2013 .

[19]  George M. Giaglis,et al.  A Taxonomy of Business Process Modeling and Information Systems Modeling Techniques , 2001 .

[20]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[21]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  Competitive Dynamics in Electronic Networks: A Model and the Case of Interorganizational Systems , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[22]  Grover S. Kearns,et al.  The effect of strategic alignment on the use of IS-based resources for competitive advantage , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Dieter K. Hammer,et al.  Architectures in context: on the evolution of business, application software, and ICT platform architectures , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  Digital Systems, Partnership Networks, and Competition: The Co-Evolution of IOS Use and Network Position as Antecedents of Competitive Action , 2008, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[26]  Mohsen Attaran,et al.  Exploring the relationship between information technology and business process reengineering , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[27]  Peter Gyngell,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology , 1994 .

[28]  William R. King,et al.  Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems Planning: An Empirical Study , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[30]  Robert J. Vokurka,et al.  Process mapping in successful ERP implementations , 2004, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..