Trends of stratified prostate cancer risk in a single Korean province from 2003 to 2021: A multicenter study conducted using regional training hospital data

Purpose To identify changes in prostate cancer (PCa) risk-stratification during the last two decades in Korea, where the social perception of PCa was limited due to a relatively low incidence but has recently been triggered by the rapidly increasing incidence of benign prostate hyperplasia. Materials and Methods Retrospective data of patients who had received a diagnosis of PCa in a single Korean province (Daegu-Gyeongsangbuk) at all seven training hospitals in the years 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015, 2019, and 2021 were subjected to analysis. Changes in PCa risk-stratification were investigated with respect to serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score (GS), and clinical stage. Results Of the 3,393 study subjects that received a diagnosis of PCa, 64.1% had high-risk disease, 23.0% intermediate, and 12.9% low-risk disease. The proportion diagnosed with high-risk disease was 54.8% in 2003, 30.6% in 2019, but then increased to 35.1% in 2021. The proportion of patients with high PSA (>20 ng/mL) steadily decreased from 59.4% in 2003 to 29.6% in 2021, whereas the proportion with a high GS (>8) increased from 32.8% in 2011 to 34.0% in 2021, and the proportion with advanced stage disease (over cT2c) increased from 26.5% in 2011 to 37.1% in 2021. Conclusions In this retrospective study, conducted in a single Korean province, high-risk PCa accounted for the largest proportion of newly registered Korean PCa patients during the last two decades and increased in the early 2020s. This outcome supports the adoption of nationwide PSA screening, regardless of current Western guidelines.

[1]  Byung Hoon Kim,et al.  The national-wide incidence of prostate-specific antigen testing trend for a decade in Korea by age group , 2022, Investigative and clinical urology.

[2]  A. Cole,et al.  Does Veteran Status Mitigate Racial Disparities in Prostate Cancer Screening? Analysis of Prostate Specific Antigen Screening Patterns in the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data , 2021, The Journal of urology.

[3]  M. Cooperberg,et al.  Changes in Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Relative to the Revised US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation on Prostate Cancer Screening. , 2021, JAMA oncology.

[4]  A. Fagerlin,et al.  The Association of Veterans' PSA Screening Rates with Changes in USPSTF Recommendations. , 2020, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  Ji Hyung Yu,et al.  Survey Results on the Perception of Prostate-Specific Antigen and Prostate Cancer Screening Among the General Public , 2020 .

[6]  H. Welch,et al.  Reconsidering Prostate Cancer Mortality - The Future of PSA Screening. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  V. Patel,et al.  Trends in clinical and oncological outcomes of robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy before and after the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation against PSA screening: a decade of experience , 2020, BJU international.

[8]  Kazuto Ito,et al.  Screening for prostate cancer: History, evidence, controversies and future perspectives toward individualized screening , 2019, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[9]  Douglas K Owens,et al.  Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement , 2018, JAMA.

[10]  P. Marcus,et al.  Patterns of Prostate-Specific Antigen Test Use in the U.S., 2005-2015. , 2017, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  Jeonghoon Ahn,et al.  Economic evaluation of prostate cancer screening test as a national cancer screening program in South Korea. , 2014, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[12]  V. Moyer,et al.  Screening for Prostate Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  Yongmei Chen,et al.  Prostate cancer in men 70 years old or older, indolent or aggressive: clinicopathological analysis and outcomes. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[14]  David Chia,et al.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  B. G. Blijenberg,et al.  Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  J. Moul,et al.  Men older than 70 years have higher risk prostate cancer and poorer survival in the early and late prostate specific antigen eras. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[17]  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. , 2008, Annals of internal medicine.

[18]  E. Feuer,et al.  Reconstructing PSA testing patterns between black and white men in the US from Medicare claims and the National Health Interview Survey , 2007, Cancer.

[19]  M. Cooperberg,et al.  The changing face of prostate cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  E. Feuer,et al.  The role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing patterns in the recent prostate cancer incidence declinein the United States , 1998, Cancer Causes & Control.

[21]  M. Cooperberg,et al.  Time trends in clinical risk stratification for prostate cancer: implications for outcomes (data from CaPSURE). , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[22]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  Screening men for prostate and colorectal cancer in the United States: does practice reflect the evidence? , 2003, JAMA.