A study of user participation in information systems development

User participation in information system development is considered to be an important factor influencing implementation success or failure. The ETHICS (Effective Technical and Human Implementation of Computer-based Systems) method was developed as a guide to user involvement in system design. A case study of successful implementation which did not use the ETHICS method explicitly is described. The case study and the ETHICS methodology are then compared and contrasted in an attempt to gain greater insight into user participation and to understand why the implementation was successful. Furthermore, techniques of software process modelling are applied to both ETHICS and the case study with the intention of more closely defining the user participation process and potentially also guiding it in future developments. The case study is used as a vehicle both to examine user participation and also to investigate the modelling of user participation.

[1]  John Kelly,et al.  A Reappraisal of Sociotechnical Systems Theory , 1978 .

[2]  Daniel Robey,et al.  A Social Process Model of User-Analyst Relationships , 1992, MIS Q..

[3]  D. Ross Jeffery,et al.  CASE: a testbed for modeling, measurement and management , 1992, CACM.

[4]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[5]  Dorothy Leon Ard-Barton Implementation Characteristics of Organizational Innovations , 1988 .

[6]  S. Wade A new course in systems analysis and design , 1991 .

[7]  John Banbury,et al.  The Human Side of Information Processing , 1981 .

[8]  Kailash Joshi,et al.  A Model of Users' Perspective on Change: The Case of Information Systems Technology Implementation , 1991, MIS Q..

[9]  Kenneth D. Eason,et al.  Ergonomic perspectives on advances in human-computer interaction , 1991 .

[10]  C. R. Franz,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT, USER INVOLVEMENT, AND THE USEFULNESS OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS* , 1986 .

[11]  H OlsonMargrethe,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success , 1984 .

[12]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  Socio-Technical Design , 1985 .

[13]  George W. Fairweather,et al.  Innovation and Social Process: A National Experiment in Implementing Social Technology , 1980 .

[14]  G. Tate Software process modelling and metrics: a CASE study , 1993, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[15]  Jorgen P. Bansler Systems development in Scandinavia: three theoretical schools , 1988 .

[16]  C. Tully Proceedings of the 4th international software process workshop on Representing and enacting the software process , 1988 .

[17]  Henri Barki,et al.  Rethinking the Concept of User Involvement , 1989, MIS Q..

[18]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Computer systems in work design--the ETHICS method : effective technical and human implementation of computer systems , 1979 .

[19]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[20]  Colin A. Carnall Managing strategic change: An integrated approach , 1986 .

[21]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  Managing the change to an automated office: lessons from five case studies , 1988 .

[22]  Neils Bjorn-Anderson Human Side of Information Processing , 1980 .

[23]  L. Douglas Smith,et al.  Communicative action and decision support system development : an integrative approach , 1990 .

[24]  Blake Ives,et al.  An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction , 1986, CACM.

[25]  Blake Ives,et al.  Executive Involvement and Participation in the Management of Information Technology , 1991, MIS Q..

[26]  James H. Gerlach,et al.  Understanding Human-Computer Interaction for Information Systems Design , 1991, MIS Q..

[27]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Theory-W Software Project Management: Principles and Examples , 1989, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[28]  C. H. Kriebel Management information systems , 1970, ACM '70.

[29]  Ravi S. Sharma,et al.  A socio-technical model for deploying expert systems. I. The general theory , 1991 .

[30]  Blake Ives,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research , 1984 .

[31]  Louis G. Tornatzky,et al.  2 – Social Process and Social Innovation , 1980 .

[32]  Iris Vessey,et al.  The Effect of User Involvement on System Success: A Contingency Approach , 1988, MIS Q..