On optimal performance of nonlinear energy sinks in multiple-degree-of-freedom systems

Abstract We study the problem of optimizing the performance of a nonlinear spring–mass–damper attached to a class of multiple-degree-of-freedom systems. We aim to maximize the rate of one-way energy transfer from primary system to the attachment, and focus on impulsive excitation of a two-degree-of-freedom primary system with an essentially nonlinear attachment. The nonlinear attachment is shown to be able to perform as a ‘nonlinear energy sink’ (NES) by taking away energy from the primary system irreversibly for some types of impulsive excitations. Using perturbation analysis and exploiting separation of time scales, we perform dimensionality reduction of this strongly nonlinear system. Our analysis shows that efficient energy transfer to nonlinear attachment in this system occurs for initial conditions close to homoclinic orbit of the slow time-scale undamped system, a phenomenon that has been previously observed for the case of single-degree-of-freedom primary systems. Analytical formulae for optimal parameters for given impulsive excitation input are derived. Generalization of this framework to systems with arbitrary number of degrees-of-freedom of the primary system is also discussed. The performance of both linear and nonlinear optimally tuned attachments is compared. While NES performance is sensitive to magnitude of the initial impulse, our results show that NES performance is more robust than linear tuned mass damper to several parametric perturbations. Hence, our work provides evidence that homoclinic orbits of the underlying Hamiltonian system play a crucial role in efficient nonlinear energy transfers, even in high dimensional systems, and gives new insight into robustness of systems with essential nonlinearity.

[1]  Piyush Grover,et al.  Optimized Three-Body Gravity Assists and Manifold Transfers in End-to-End Lunar Mission Design , 2012 .

[2]  Alexander F. Vakakis,et al.  Irreversible Passive Energy Transfer in Coupled Oscillators with Essential Nonlinearity , 2005, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[3]  I. Mezić,et al.  On passage through resonances in volume-preserving systems. , 2006, Chaos.

[4]  Brian P. Mann,et al.  Quenching chatter instability in turning process with a vibro-impact nonlinear energy sink , 2015 .

[5]  Ramy Harik,et al.  Design of a vibration absorber for harmonically forced damped systems , 2015 .

[6]  Oleg Gendelman,et al.  Dynamics of linear discrete systems connected to local, essentially non-linear attachments , 2003 .

[7]  D. M. McFarland,et al.  Tailoring Strongly Nonlinear Negative Stiffness , 2014 .

[9]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Parametric study and simplified design of tuned mass dampers , 1998 .

[10]  A. F. Vakakisb,et al.  Efficiency of targeted energy transfers in coupled nonlinear oscillators associated with 1 : 1 resonance captures : Part II , analytical study , 2009 .

[11]  B. Wang,et al.  Transient response optimization of vibrating structures by Liapunov's second method , 1984 .

[12]  Oleg Gendelman,et al.  Energy Pumping in Nonlinear Mechanical Oscillators: Part II—Resonance Capture , 2001 .

[13]  Tae-Hyoung Kim,et al.  H∞ optimization of dynamic vibration absorber variant for vibration control of damped linear systems , 2015 .

[14]  Alexander F. Vakakis,et al.  Complicated dynamics of a linear oscillator with a light, essentially nonlinear attachment , 2005 .

[15]  Emiliano Rustighi,et al.  A simple method for choosing the parameters of a two degree-of-freedom tuned vibration absorber , 2012 .

[16]  Piyush Grover,et al.  Designing Trajectories in a Planet-Moon Environment Using the Controlled Keplerian Map , 2009 .

[17]  A. Baz,et al.  Analytical Solutions to H∞ and H2 Optimization of Dynamic Vibration Absorbers Attached to Damped Linear Systems , 2002 .

[18]  Emiliano Rustighi,et al.  Optimisation of dynamic vibration absorbers to minimise kinetic energy and maximise internal power dissipation , 2012 .

[19]  P. Olver Nonlinear Systems , 2013 .

[20]  Oleg Gendelman,et al.  Dynamics of forced system with vibro-impact energy sink , 2015 .

[21]  Alexander F. Vakakis,et al.  Numerical and experimental investigation of a highly effective single-sided vibro-impact non-linear energy sink for shock mitigation , 2013 .

[22]  G. Kerschen,et al.  Nonlinear Targeted Energy Transfer in Mechanical and Structural Systems , 2008 .

[23]  Shane D. Ross,et al.  Heteroclinic connections between periodic orbits and resonance transitions in celestial mechanics. , 2000, Chaos.

[24]  Giovanni Caruso,et al.  Closed-form formulas for the optimal pole-based design of tuned mass dampers , 2012 .

[25]  Hirokazu Fujisaka,et al.  Chaotic phase synchronization and phase diffusion , 2005 .

[26]  Emiliano Rustighi,et al.  Analysis and optimisation of tuned mass dampers for impulsive excitation , 2013 .

[27]  Gaetan Kerschen,et al.  Theoretical and Experimental Study of Multimodal Targeted Energy Transfer in a System of Coupled Oscillators , 2006 .

[28]  Alexander F. Vakakis,et al.  Study of a class of subharmonic motions using a non-smooth temporal transformation (NSTT) , 1997 .

[29]  T. Sapsis,et al.  Efficiency of targeted energy transfers in coupled nonlinear oscillators associated with 1:1 resonance captures: Part I , 2008 .

[30]  T. Sapsis,et al.  Efficiency of targeted energy transfers in coupled nonlinear oscillators associated with 1:1 resonance captures:Part II, analytical study , 2009 .

[31]  Edward Ott,et al.  Targeting in Hamiltonian systems that have mixed regular/chaotic phase spaces. , 1997, Chaos.