Firm Scope Experience, Historic Multimarket Contact with Partners, Centrality and the Relationship between Structural Holes and Performance

This study investigates characteristics that affect the relationship between firms' positions in a network of collaborative ties with other firms and their performance. Firms located in similarly structured networks rich in structural holes may obtain different performance results depending on their (1) capacity to absorb heterogeneous information, (2) ability to protect against partner noncooperation, and (3) bargaining power. In this paper, I argue that firms with a wide scope of experience have superior absorptive capacity for dealing with heterogeneous information; hence, such firms will be able to extract performance improvements from network positions rich in structural holes. Furthermore, firms with a high level of historic multimarket contact (MMC) with their partners are able to reduce the risks of partner noncooperation, hence augmenting their performance compared to firms in open networks that do not enjoy MMC with their own partners. Finally, firms of low centrality in the industry's network of alliances will extract performance benefits from enhancing bargaining power as a result of exploiting brokerage opportunities in open networks. These arguments are corroborated in a study of relationships formed among investment banks' advising on the merger and acquisition transactions in the United Kingdom between 1992 and 2001.

[1]  M. Whinston,et al.  Multimarket Contact and Collusive Behavior , 1990 .

[2]  A. van Witteloostuijn,et al.  Companion to organizations , 2002 .

[3]  Ajay K. Kohli,et al.  The market share‐profitability relationship: An empirical assessment of major assertions and contradictions , 1986 .

[4]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[5]  J. Pennings,et al.  Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology‐based ventures , 2001 .

[6]  Tim Rowley,et al.  Inertia and Evaluation Mechanisms in Interorganizational Partner Selection: Syndicate Formation among U.S. Investment Banks , 2002 .

[7]  B. Kogut,et al.  Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network , 1997 .

[8]  Ashoka Mody,et al.  Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 20 (1993) lSlLl70. North-Holland Learning through alliances , 1991 .

[9]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Introduction: A multiunit, multimarket world , 2001 .

[11]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Sophistication of interfirm network strategies in the Canadian investment banking industry , 2004 .

[13]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[14]  Peter E. Kennedy.  A Guide to Econometrics , 1979 .

[15]  R. Gulati,et al.  The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope , 1998 .

[16]  J. Jaccard,et al.  Interaction effects in multiple regression , 1992 .

[17]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Where Do Small Worlds Come From? , 2003 .

[18]  L. Argote,et al.  The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings , 1990 .

[19]  E. L. Cox,et al.  Guest editors\' introduction to the special issue: why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity , 2003 .

[20]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[21]  Arvind Parkhe.  Strategic Alliance Structuring: A Game Theoretic and Transaction Cost Examination of Interfirm Cooperation , 1993 .

[22]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[23]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Bridge decay , 2002, Soc. Networks.

[24]  Warren Boeker,et al.  Getting to multimarket competition: How multimarket contact affects firms' market entry decisions , 2001 .

[25]  Dovev Lavie.  The Competitive Advantage of Interconnected Firms: An Extension of the Resource-Based View , 2006 .

[26]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Syndication Networks and the Spatial Distribution of Venture Capital Investments1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Learning from Complexity: Effects of Prior Accidents and Incidents on Airlines' Learning , 2002 .

[28]  Craig G. Dunbar,et al.  Factors Affecting Investment Bank Initial Public Offering Market Share , 1997 .

[29]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation , 2000 .

[30]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[31]  Joel Podolny.  Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange , 1994 .

[32]  Royston Greenwood,et al.  Ownership and Performance of Professional Service Firms , 2006 .

[33]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge.  Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[34]  J. Pennings,et al.  Technological Networking and Innovation Implementation , 1992 .

[35]  Pamela R. Haunschild.  How Much Is That Company Worth?: Interorganizational Relationships, Uncertainty and Acquisition Premiums , 1994 .

[36]  R. Eccles,et al.  Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action , 1992 .

[37]  P. Rajan Varadarajan,et al.  The Theory of Multimarket Competition: A Synthesis and Implications for Marketing Strategy , 1999 .

[38]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Econometrics , 1985 .

[39]  Christopher P. Holland,et al.  IS in Interorganizational Networks , 2010 .

[40]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  The Acquisition, Transfer, and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises , 1995 .

[41]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  C. Coulton,et al.  Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1993 .

[43]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[44]  Giuliano Mussati.  Mergers, markets and public policy , 1995 .

[45]  C. D. Edwards,et al.  Conglomerate Bigness as a Source of Power , 1955 .

[46]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Network Position and Firm Performance: Organizational Returns to Collaboration in the Biotechnology Industry , 1999 .

[47]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[48]  Nan Lin,et al.  SOCIAL NETWORKS AND STATUS ATTAINMENT , 1999 .

[49]  Richard Makadok.  Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creation , 2001 .

[50]  Brian S. Silverman,et al.  Alliance-Based Competitive Dynamics , 2002 .

[51]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[52]  Nataša Golubovi,et al.  NETWORK STRUCTURE OF SOCIAL CAPITAL , 2010 .

[53]  Joel Podolny.  A Status-Based Model of Market Competition , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  TRADEOFFS IN THE ORGANIZATION OF PRODUCTION : MULTI-UNIT FIRMS , GEOGRAPHIC DISPERSION AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING , 2000 .

[55]  A. Shipilov.  Network Strategies and Performance of Canadian Investment Banks , 2006 .

[56]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[57]  Ajay Mehra,et al.  The Social Networks of High and Low Self-Monitors: Implications for Workplace Performance , 2001 .

[58]  Robert G. Eccles,et al.  Doing Deals: Investment Banks at Work. , 1989 .

[59]  Stan Xiao Li,et al.  Reputation, Diversification and Organizational Explanations of Performance in Professional Service Firms , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[60]  W. Finlay,et al.  Risk, Opportunism, and Structural Holes , 2000 .

[61]  R. Burt.  The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[62]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  OPPORTUNITY AND CONSTRAINT: ORGANIZATIONS’ LEARNING FROM THE OPERATING AND COMPETITIVE EXPERIENCE OF INDUSTRIES , 1997 .

[63]  Greenwich Associates.  Financial Services without Borders: How to Succeed in Professional Financial Services , 2001 .

[64]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[65]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[66]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[67]  C. Veljanovski,et al.  Merger and Monopoly Policies in the UK , 1995 .

[68]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[69]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: increasing opportunity and decreasing ability? , 2003 .

[70]  R. Gulati.  Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[71]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[72]  Charlene L Nicholls-Nixon.  Absorptive capacity and technology sourcing: Implications for responsiveness of established firms , 1993 .

[73]  Patricia E. Tweet.  Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2006 .

[74]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  So many ties, so little time: A task contingency perspective on corporate social capital in organizations , 2001 .

[75]  Javier Gimeno,et al.  Reciprocal threats in multimarket rivalry: staking out ‘spheres of influence’ in the U.S. airline industry , 1999 .

[76]  Johann Peter Murmann,et al.  Competition in a Multimarket Environment: The Case of Market Exit , 1997 .

[77]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[78]  Carolyn Y. Woo,et al.  Hypercompetition in a Multimarket Environment: The Role of Strategic Similarity and Multimarket Contact in Competitive De-Escalation , 1996 .

[79]  Toby E. Stuart.  Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i , 2000 .

[80]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[81]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Multiunit Organization and Multimarket Strategy , 2001 .

[82]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Learning from Complexity: Effects of Accident/Incident Heterogenity on Airline Learning , 2000 .

[83]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[84]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[85]  B. Golden,et al.  Mutual Forbearance: The Role of Intrafirm Integration and Rewards , 2003 .

[86]  G. Hamel.  Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[87]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  Strategic alliances as social capital: a multidimensional view , 2002 .

[88]  Timothy G. Pollock,et al.  Constructing Deal Networks: Brokers as Network “Architects” in the U.S. IPO Market and Other Examples , 2004 .

[89]  Industriens Utredningsinstitut,et al.  Human Capital , Social Capital and Compensation : The Relative Contribution of Social Contacts to Managers ' Incomes , 2003 .