Approximation Theory Applied to DEM Vertical Accuracy Assessment

Existing research on DEM vertical accuracy assessment uses mainly statistical methods, in particular variance and RMSE which are both based on the error propagation theory in statistics. This article demonstrates that error propagation theory is not applicable because the critical assumption behind it cannot be satisfied. In fact, the non-random, non-normal, and non-stationary nature of DEM error makes it very challenging to apply statistical methods. This article presents approximation theory as a new methodology and illustrates its application to DEMs created by linear interpolation using contour lines as the source data. Applying approximation theory, a DEM’s accuracy is determined by the largest error of any point (not samples) in the entire study area. The error at a point is bounded by max(|dnode| + M2h 2 /8) where |dnode| is the error in the source data used to interpolate the point, M2 is the maximum norm of the second-order derivative which can be interpreted as curvature, and h is the length of the line on which linear interpolation is conducted. The article explains how to compute each term and illustrates how this new methodology based on approximation theory effectively facilitates DEM accuracy assessment and quality control.

[1]  Manuel A. Aguilar,et al.  Modelling vertical error in LiDAR-derived digital elevation models , 2010 .

[2]  Benoit M. Macq,et al.  Fast Euclidean Distance Transformation by Propagation Using Multiple Neighborhoods , 1999, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[3]  Zhilin Li,et al.  Theoretical models of the accuracy of digital terrain models: an evaluation and some observations , 1993 .

[4]  Michael J. Oimoen,et al.  The National Elevation Dataset , 2002 .

[5]  K. Atkinson Elementary numerical analysis , 1985 .

[6]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  On the prediction error variance of three common spatial interpolation schemes , 2006, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Manuel A. Aguilar,et al.  The accuracy of grid digital elevation models linearly constructed from scattered sample data , 2006, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Y. D. Huang Evaluation of Information Loss in Digital Elevation Models With Digital Photogrammetric Systems , 2000 .

[9]  Xiaohang Liu,et al.  ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF LIDAR-DERIVED DEM BASED ON APPROXIMATION THEORY , 2012 .

[10]  Hai Hu,et al.  Isomorphism in Digital Elevation Models and Its Implication to Interpolation Functions , 2009 .

[11]  Tapani Sarjakoski,et al.  Uncovering the statistical and spatial characteristics of fine toposcale DEM error , 2006, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Xiaohang Liu,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of Digital Elevation Models based on Approximation Theory , 2009 .

[13]  W. Shi,et al.  Estimating the propagation error of DEM from higher‐order interpolation algorithms , 2005 .

[14]  Olivier Bonin,et al.  Digital Terrain Model Computation from Contour Lines: How to Derive Quality Information from Artifact Analysis , 2005, GeoInformatica.

[15]  Franz Aurenhammer,et al.  Voronoi diagrams—a survey of a fundamental geometric data structure , 1991, CSUR.

[16]  Peter F. Fisher,et al.  Improved Modeling of Elevation Error with Geostatistics , 1998, GeoInformatica.

[17]  Zhilin Li VARIATION OF THE ACCURACY OF DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS WITH SAMPLING INTERVAL , 2006 .

[18]  Bruce H. Carlisle,et al.  Modelling the Spatial Distribution of DEM Error , 2005, Trans. GIS.

[19]  Stephen Wise,et al.  Assessing the quality for hydrological applications of digital elevation models derived from contours , 2000 .

[20]  Clyde R Greenwalt,et al.  PRINCIPLES OF ERROR THEORY AND CARTOGRAPHIC APPLICATIONS , 1962 .