Rapid divergence of gene duplicates on the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome.

The recent sequencing of several eukaryotic genomes has generated considerable interest in the study of gene duplication events. The classical model of duplicate gene evolution is that recurrent mutation ultimately results in one copy becoming a pseudogene, and only rarely will a beneficial new function evolve. Here, we study divergence between coding sequence duplications in Drosophila melanogaster as a function of the linkage relationship between paralogs. The mean K(a)/K(s) between all duplicates in the D. melanogaster genome is 0.2803, indicating that purifying selection is maintaining the structure of duplicate coding sequences. However, the mean K(a)/K(s) between duplicates that are both on the X chromosome is 0.4701, significantly higher than the genome average. Further, the distribution of K(a)/K(s) for these X-linked duplicates is significantly shifted toward higher values when compared with the distributions for paralogs in other linkage relationships. Two models of molecular evolution provide qualitative explanations of these observations-relaxation of selective pressure on the duplicate copies and, more likely, positive selection on recessive adaptations. We also show that there is an excess of X-linked duplicates with low K(s), suggesting a larger proportion of relatively young duplicates on the D. melanogaster X chromosome relative to autosomes.

[1]  D. Schemske,et al.  Genetic mapping of floral traits associated with reproductive isolation in monkeyflowers (Mimulus) , 1995, Nature.

[2]  A. Hughes,et al.  Maintenance of MHC polymorphism , 1992, Nature.

[3]  Kevin R. Thornton,et al.  Gene duplication and evolution. , 2001, Science.

[4]  D. Petrov,et al.  High intrinsic rate of DNA loss in Drosophila , 1996, Nature.

[5]  H. A. Orr,et al.  Haldane's sieve and adaptation from the standing genetic variation. , 2001, Genetics.

[6]  H. L. Carson,et al.  The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila , 1976, Heredity.

[7]  H. Akashi,et al.  Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA. , 1995, Genetics.

[8]  C. Aquadro,et al.  Rates of DNA sequence evolution are not sex-biased in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. , 1997, Molecular biology and evolution.

[9]  Gerald J. Wyckoff,et al.  Rapid evolution of male reproductive genes in the descent of man , 2000, Nature.

[10]  M. R. Adams,et al.  Comparative genomics of the eukaryotes. , 2000, Science.

[11]  E. Stahl,et al.  Dynamics of disease resistance polymorphism at the Rpm1 locus of Arabidopsis , 1999, Nature.

[12]  M. Long,et al.  Natural selection and the origin of jingwei, a chimeric processed functional gene in Drosophila. , 1993, Science.

[13]  Nicholas H. Barton,et al.  The Relative Rates of Evolution of Sex Chromosomes and Autosomes , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[14]  J. Haldane,et al.  The Part Played by Recurrent Mutation in Evolution , 1933, The American Naturalist.

[15]  K. Holsinger The neutral theory of molecular evolution , 2004 .

[16]  A MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL SELECTION. PART II THE INFLUENCE OF PARTIAL SELF‐FERTILISATION, INBREEDING, ASSORTATIVE MATING, AND SELECTIVE FERTILISATION ON THE COMPOSITION OF MENDELIAN POPULATIONS, AND ON NATURAL SELECTION. , 1924 .

[17]  Stephen M. Mount,et al.  The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. , 2000, Science.

[18]  M. Aguadé,et al.  Natural selection on synonymous sites is correlated with gene length and recombination in Drosophila. , 1999, Genetics.

[19]  J. Powell,et al.  Evolution of codon usage bias in Drosophila. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  J. B. Walsh,et al.  How often do duplicated genes evolve new functions? , 1995, Genetics.

[21]  R. Fisher,et al.  The Sheltering of Lethals , 1935, The American Naturalist.

[22]  J. Crow,et al.  Evidence for the Partial Dominance of Recessive Lethal Genes in Natural Populations of Drosophila , 1964, The American Naturalist.

[23]  J. Haldane,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection. Part VII. Selection intensity as a function of mortality rate , 1931, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[24]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[25]  D. Begun,et al.  Reduced X-linked nucleotide polymorphism in Drosophila simulans. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  D. Hartl,et al.  Selective sweep of a newly evolved sperm-specific gene in Drosophila , 1998, Nature.

[27]  R. Greenberg Biometry , 1969, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[28]  Josep M. Comeron,et al.  A method for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions per site , 1995, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[29]  J. Crow,et al.  Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1972, Genetics.

[30]  A. Clark,et al.  Invasion and maintenance of a gene duplication. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[32]  P. Andolfatto Contrasting patterns of X-linked and autosomal nucleotide variation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[33]  Z. Yang,et al.  Substitution rates in Drosophila nuclear genes: implications for translational selection. , 2001, Genetics.

[34]  M. Kimura The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution: Introduction , 1983 .

[35]  A. Force,et al.  Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. , 1999, Genetics.

[36]  W. Pearson Rapid and sensitive sequence comparison with FASTP and FASTA. , 1990, Methods in enzymology.

[37]  M. Long,et al.  The origin of the Jingwei gene and the complex modular structure of its parental gene, yellow emperor, in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[38]  Gilean McVean,et al.  A population genetic model for the evolution of synonymous codon usage: patterns and predictions , 1999 .

[39]  Mandy J. Haldane,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection, Part V: Selection and Mutation , 1927, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[40]  B. Charlesworth Evolutionary Rates in Partially Self-Fertilizing Species , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[41]  M. Lynch,et al.  The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. , 2000, Science.

[42]  A. Force,et al.  The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. , 2000, Genetics.

[43]  Michael P. Cummings,et al.  PAML (Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood) , 2004 .

[44]  D. Schemske,et al.  Quantitative trait loci affecting differences in floral morphology between two species of monkeyflower (Mimulus). , 1998, Genetics.