Comprehensive analysis of a multi-generation energy system by using an energy-exergy methodology for hot water, cooling, power and hydrogen production

Abstract In this study, an energy-exergy methodology was applied to achieve more precise conditions for hot water, cooling, power and hydrogen production via a proposed multi-generation system comprised of a geothermal based organic Rankine cycle, domestic water heater, absorption refrigeration cycle and proton exchange membrane electrolyzer. Furthermore, for evaluation of the proposed system performance, the effects of such key variables as brine temperature, turbine inlet temperature, generator temperature, brine mass flow rate and electrolyzer current density on the related efficiencies of energy and exergy for the whole system were investigated. For specified conditions, the results show that energy and exergy efficiencies of the entire system are calculated around 33.92% and 43.59%, respectively. Moreover, estimation of the exergy destruction rate in each system component indicated that the highest rate of exergy destruction occurred in the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) with 16.65% of the total amount of exergy input to the system. And finally, net electrical power output, mass flow rate of hot water, cooling capacity and mass flow rate of hydrogen production are as follows: 816.7 kW, 7.06 kg/s, 1896 kW and 0.05g/s.

[1]  D. Leung,et al.  Energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen production by a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzer plant , 2008 .

[2]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Thermodynamic analyses and case studies of geothermal based multi-generation systems , 2012 .

[3]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Renewable‐energy‐based multigeneration systems , 2012 .

[4]  Mehmet Kanoglu,et al.  Performance and parametric investigation of a binary geothermal power plant by exergy , 2008 .

[5]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Multi-objective exergy-based optimization of a polygeneration energy system using an evolutionary algorithm , 2012 .

[6]  M. W. Chase,et al.  NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables, 4th Edition , 1998 .

[7]  S. Chan,et al.  Energy and exergy analysis of simple solid-oxide fuel-cell power systems , 2002 .

[8]  F. Ranjbar,et al.  Hydrogen production using the waste heat of Benchmark pressurized Molten carbonate fuel cell system via combination of organic Rankine cycle and proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis , 2017 .

[9]  M. Kanoğlu,et al.  Thermodynamic evaluation of geothermal energy powered hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis , 2014 .

[10]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Performance evaluations of a geothermal power plant , 2011 .

[11]  Alper Ergün,et al.  Exergoeconomic analysis of a geothermal organic Rankine cycle power plant using the SPECO method , 2017 .

[12]  Francesco Calise,et al.  Exergetic and exergoeconomic analysis of a novel hybrid solar-geothermal polygeneration system producing energy and water , 2016 .

[13]  A. Abusoglu,et al.  Exergetic cost evaluation of hydrogen production powered by combined flash-binary geothermal power plant , 2015 .

[14]  V. Zare,et al.  A comparative exergoeconomic analysis of different ORC configurations for binary geothermal power plants , 2015 .

[15]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Analysis and performance evaluation of a renewable energy based multigeneration system , 2016 .

[16]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Thermodynamic and exergoenvironmental analyses, and multi-objective optimization of a gas turbine power plant , 2011 .

[17]  K. Yasuda,et al.  Thin film electrocatalyst layer for unitized regenerative polymer electrolyte fuel cells , 2002 .

[18]  T. J. Kotas,et al.  Exergy Method of thermal and chemical plant analysis , 1986 .

[19]  Fahad A. Al-Sulaiman,et al.  Energy and exergy analyses of a biomass trigeneration system using an organic Rankine cycle , 2012 .