A general flamelet transformation useful for distinguishing between premixed and non-premixed modes of combustion

The flame index was originally proposed by Yamashita et al. as a method of locally distinguishing between premixed and non-premixed combustion. Although this index has been applied both passively in the analysis of direct numerical simulation data, and actively using single step combustion models, certain limitations restrict its use in more detailed combustion models. In this work a general flamelet transformation that holds in the limits of both premixed and non-premixed combustion is developed. This transformation makes use of two statistically independent variables: a mixture fraction and a reaction progress parameter. The transformation is used to produce a model for distinguishing between premixed and non-premixed combustion regimes. The new model locally examines the term budget of the general flamelet transformation. The magnitudes of each of the terms in the budget are calculated and compared to the chemical source term. Determining whether a flame burns in a premixed or a non-premixed regime then amounts to determining which sets of these terms most significantly contribute to balancing the source term. The model is tested in a numerical simulation of a laminar triple flame, and is compared to a recent manifestation of the flame index approach. Additionally, the model is applied in a presumed probability density function (PDF) large eddy simulation (LES) of a lean premixed swirl burner. The model is used to locally select whether tabulated premixed or tabulated non-premixed chemistry should be referenced in the LES. Results from the LES are compared to experiments.

[1]  P. Moin,et al.  A dynamic model for subgrid-scale variance and dissipation rate of a conserved scalar , 1998 .

[2]  R. Aris Vectors, Tensors and the Basic Equations of Fluid Mechanics , 1962 .

[3]  de Lph Philip Goey,et al.  Modeling of complex premixed burner systems by using flamelet-generated manifolds , 2001 .

[4]  B. Bédat,et al.  Experimental Study of Premixed Flames in Intense Isotropic Turbulence , 1995 .

[5]  R. Cheng,et al.  Simultaneous PIV/OH-PLIF, Rayleigh thermometry/OH-PLIF and stereo PIV measurements in a low-swirl flame. , 2007, Applied optics.

[6]  H. Pitsch,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of a turbulent piloted methane/air diffusion flame (Sandia flame D) , 2000 .

[7]  L. Vervisch,et al.  Edge flames and partially premixed combustion in diffusion flame quenching , 2001 .

[8]  A. W. Vreman,et al.  Premixed and nonpremixed generated manifolds in large-eddy simulation of Sandia flame D and F , 2008 .

[9]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  A dynamic model for the turbulent burning velocity for large eddy simulation of premixed combustion , 2008 .

[10]  Robert K. Cheng,et al.  The burning rate of premixed flames in moderate and intense turbulence , 2001 .

[11]  Luc Vervisch,et al.  DNS analysis of partially premixed combustion in spray and gaseous turbulent flame-bases stabilized in hot air , 2005 .

[12]  Denis Veynante,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of a lifted methane jet flame in a vitiated coflow , 2008 .

[13]  Nasser Darabiha,et al.  Approximating the chemical structure of partially premixed and diffusion counterflow flames using FPI flamelet tabulation , 2005 .

[14]  Suresh Menon,et al.  Simulation of spray–turbulence–flame interactions in a lean direct injection combustor , 2008 .

[15]  Parviz Moin,et al.  An evaluation of the assumed beta probability density function subgrid-scale model for large eddy simulation of nonpremixed, turbulent combustion with heat release , 2000 .

[16]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  Effects of strain rate on high-pressure nonpremixed n-heptane autoignition in counterflow , 2004 .

[17]  C. Meneveau,et al.  A Lagrangian dynamic subgrid-scale model of turbulence , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  Alison L. Marsden,et al.  Generation of Optimal Artificial Neural Networks Using a Pattern Search Algorithm: Application to Approximation of Chemical Systems , 2008, Neural Computation.

[19]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  High order conservative finite difference scheme for variable density low Mach number turbulent flows , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[20]  P. Moin,et al.  Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.