Virtual screening strategies in drug design - methods and applications

Virtual screening (VS) overcomes the limitations of traditional high-throughput screening (HTS) by applying computer-based methods in drug discovery. VS takes advantage of fast algorithms to filter chemical space and successfully select potential drug candidates. A key aspect in structure-based VS is the sampling of ligand-receptor conformations and the evaluation of these poses to predict near-native binding modes. The development of fast and accurate algorithms during the last few years has allowed VS to become an important tool in drug discovery and design. Herein, an overview of widely used ligand-based (e.g., similarity, pharmacophore searches) and structurebased (protein-ligand docking) VS methods is discussed. Their strengths and limitations are described, along with many successful stories. This review not only serves as an introductory guide for inexperienced VS users but also presents a general overview of the current state and scope of these powerful tools.

[1]  Jianhua Yao,et al.  Multiple-step virtual screening using VSM-G: overview and validation of fast geometrical matching enrichment , 2008, Journal of molecular modeling.

[2]  Richard D. Taylor,et al.  Improved protein–ligand docking using GOLD , 2003, Proteins.

[3]  Leslie A Kuhn,et al.  Side‐chain flexibility in protein–ligand binding: The minimal rotation hypothesis , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[4]  Gerhard Klebe,et al.  Comparison of Automatic Three-Dimensional Model Builders Using 639 X-ray Structures , 1994, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[5]  John M. Barnard,et al.  Chemical Similarity Searching , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[6]  Mark A. Murcko,et al.  Virtual screening : an overview , 1998 .

[7]  Jung-Hsin Lin Accommodating protein flexibility for structure-based drug design. , 2011, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[8]  Dariusz Plewczynski,et al.  VoteDock: Consensus docking method for prediction of protein–ligand interactions , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[9]  Youhoon Chong,et al.  Identification of Novel HCV RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase Inhibitors Using Pharmacophore‐Guided Virtual Screening , 2008, Chemical biology & drug design.

[10]  Eric Feyfant,et al.  Fragment-based drug design. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[11]  E. Jaeger,et al.  Docking: successes and challenges. , 2005, Current pharmaceutical design.

[12]  Ajay N. Jain Surflex-Dock 2.1: Robust performance from ligand energetic modeling, ring flexibility, and knowledge-based search , 2007, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[13]  J. Scott Dixon,et al.  Flexible ligand docking using a genetic algorithm , 1995, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[14]  Ying-Ting Lin,et al.  Efficient in silico assay of inhibitors of hepatitis C Virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase by structure-based virtual screening and in vitro evaluation. , 2011, Assay and drug development technologies.

[15]  Markus Hartenfeller,et al.  De novo drug design. , 2010, Methods in molecular biology.

[16]  Hao Chen,et al.  Virtual Screening of Novel Noncovalent Inhibitors for SARS-CoV 3C-like Proteinase , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[17]  Didier Rognan,et al.  ConsDock: A new program for the consensus analysis of protein–ligand interactions , 2002, Proteins.

[18]  Dora M Schnur,et al.  Are target-family-privileged substructures truly privileged? , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[19]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[20]  Arthur J. Olson,et al.  AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[21]  M. Murcko,et al.  Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[22]  D. Vanderwall,et al.  Inhibitors of dihydrodipicolinate reductase, a key enzyme of the diaminopimelate pathway of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. , 2001, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[23]  F. Giordanetto,et al.  Discovery of novel class 1 phosphatidylinositide 3-kinases (PI3K) fragment inhibitors through structure-based virtual screening. , 2011, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[24]  Marcin Feder,et al.  Virtual Screening and Experimental Verification to Identify Potential Inhibitors of the ErmC Methyltransferase Responsible for Bacterial Resistance against Macrolide Antibiotics , 2008, ChemMedChem.

[25]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Similarity measures in scientometric research: The Jaccard index versus Salton's cosine formula , 1989, Inf. Process. Manag..

[26]  E. Bradley,et al.  Comparing performance of computational tools for combinatorial library design. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[27]  M. Gleeson Generation of a set of simple, interpretable ADMET rules of thumb. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[28]  Yongbo Hu,et al.  Comparison of Several Molecular Docking Programs: Pose Prediction and Virtual Screening Accuracy , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[29]  N. Guex,et al.  SWISS‐MODEL and the Swiss‐Pdb Viewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[30]  I. Kuntz,et al.  DOCK 6: combining techniques to model RNA-small molecule complexes. , 2009, RNA.

[31]  G. Mustata,et al.  Discovery of modulators of protein-protein interactions: current approaches and limitations. , 2011, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[32]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998 .

[33]  Gerhard Klebe,et al.  Successful virtual screening for novel inhibitors of human carbonic anhydrase: strategy and experimental confirmation. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[34]  B. E. Evans,et al.  Methods for drug discovery: development of potent, selective, orally effective cholecystokinin antagonists. , 1988, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

[35]  Zhengrong Yang,et al.  Virtual screening to identify lead inhibitors for bacterial NAD synthetase (NADs). , 2009, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[36]  N. Mantis,et al.  Identification of new classes of ricin toxin inhibitors by virtual screening. , 2010, Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology.

[37]  Amy C Anderson,et al.  Towards in silico lead optimization: Scores from ensembles of protein/ligand conformations reliably correlate with biological activity , 2006, Proteins.

[38]  Brian K Shoichet,et al.  Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: successes and gaps. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[39]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Molecular docking and high-throughput screening for novel inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[40]  Jeremy L Jenkins,et al.  Virtual screening to enrich hit lists from high‐throughput screening: A case study on small‐molecule inhibitors of angiogenin , 2002, Proteins.

[41]  Lutz Tautz,et al.  In Silico Screening for PTPN22 Inhibitors: Active Hits from an Inactive Phosphatase Conformation , 2009, ChemMedChem.

[42]  Lorenz C. Blum,et al.  Identification of selective norbornane-type aspartate analogue inhibitors of the glutamate transporter 1 (GLT-1) from the chemical universe generated database (GDB). , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[43]  I D Kuntz,et al.  Structure-based discovery of ligands targeted to the RNA double helix. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[44]  Ding-Shinn Chen,et al.  Structure-based discovery of triphenylmethane derivatives as inhibitors of hepatitis C virus helicase. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[45]  D. Rognan Chemogenomic approaches to rational drug design , 2007, British journal of pharmacology.

[46]  Dariusz Plewczynski,et al.  Can we trust docking results? Evaluation of seven commonly used programs on PDBbind database , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[47]  Stefan Paula,et al.  Structure-based virtual screening for novel inhibitors of the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase and their experimental evaluation. , 2009, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[48]  Hugo Kubinyi,et al.  Success Stories of Computer‐Aided Design , 2006 .

[49]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..

[50]  Martin Hofmann-Apitius,et al.  Alternative to Consensus ScoringA New Approach Toward the Qualitative Combination of Docking Algorithms , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[51]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  Search for Non-Nucleoside Inhibitors of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Using Chemical Similarity, Molecular Docking, and MM-GB/SA Scoring , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[52]  Miklos Feher,et al.  Consensus scoring for protein-ligand interactions. , 2006, Drug discovery today.

[53]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[54]  Thomas E. Exner,et al.  Influence of Protonation, Tautomeric, and Stereoisomeric States on Protein-Ligand Docking Results , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[55]  W. Guida,et al.  The art and practice of structure‐based drug design: A molecular modeling perspective , 1996, Medicinal research reviews.

[56]  Pedro M Alzari,et al.  Discovery of novel inhibitors of Trypanosoma cruzi trans-sialidase from in silico screening. , 2009, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[57]  Young Do Kwon,et al.  Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of small molecule inhibitors of CD4-gp120 binding based on virtual screening. , 2011, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[58]  G. Klebe Virtual ligand screening: strategies, perspectives and limitations , 2006, Drug Discovery Today.

[59]  Martin Hofmann-Apitius,et al.  Alternative to Consensus Scoring — A New Approach Toward the Qualitative Combination of Docking Algorithms. , 2007 .

[60]  Didier Rognan,et al.  Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy , 2004, Proteins.

[61]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[62]  Irwin D. Kuntz,et al.  Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5 , 2006, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[63]  Janez Konc,et al.  Discovery of new inhibitors of D-alanine:D-alanine ligase by structure-based virtual screening. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[64]  D. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking to multiple target structures: Incorporation of protein mobility and structural water heterogeneity in AutoDock , 2002, Proteins.

[65]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Improved cyclodextrin-based receptors for camptothecin by inverse virtual screening. , 2007, Chemistry.

[66]  Béla Noszál,et al.  Discovery of novel human histamine H4 receptor ligands by large-scale structure-based virtual screening. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[67]  R Cedergren,et al.  Modeling RNA-ligand interactions: the Rev-binding element RNA-aminoglycoside complex. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[68]  Zhili Zuo,et al.  Identification of a sub-micromolar, non-peptide inhibitor of β-secretase with low neural cytotoxicity through in silico screening. , 2010, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[69]  Luigi Petraccone,et al.  Structure-based drug design: from nucleic acid to membrane protein targets. , 2009, Experimental and molecular pathology.

[70]  Thomas R Ioerger,et al.  Discovery of novel nitrobenzothiazole inhibitors for Mycobacterium tuberculosis ATP phosphoribosyl transferase (HisG) through virtual screening. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[71]  Kazuhiro Yasuno,et al.  Evaluation of docking calculations on X-ray structures using CONSENSUS-DOCK. , 2010, Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin.

[72]  Simona Distinto,et al.  Evaluation of the performance of 3D virtual screening protocols: RMSD comparisons, enrichment assessments, and decoy selection—What can we learn from earlier mistakes? , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[73]  James M. Briggs,et al.  A structure-based design approach for the identification of novel inhibitors: application to an alanine racemase , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[74]  Jonathan B. Chaires,et al.  Discovery of novel triple helical DNA intercalators by an integrated virtual and actual screening platform , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[75]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Scaffold hopping through virtual screening using 2D and 3D similarity descriptors: ranking, voting, and consensus scoring. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[76]  Chiaki Fukushima,et al.  Combination of virtual screening and high throughput gene profiling for identification of novel liver X receptor modulators. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[77]  Pedro Alexandrino Fernandes,et al.  Protein–ligand docking: Current status and future challenges , 2006, Proteins.

[78]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  Virtual screening of chemical libraries , 2004, Nature.

[79]  Peter Ertl,et al.  Quest for the rings. In silico exploration of ring universe to identify novel bioactive heteroaromatic scaffolds. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[80]  F. Allen The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising. , 2002, Acta crystallographica. Section B, Structural science.

[81]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Identification of ligands for RNA targets via structure-based virtual screening: HIV-1 TAR , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[82]  Gilles Marcou,et al.  Optimizing Fragment and Scaffold Docking by Use of Molecular Interaction Fingerprints , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[83]  Christopher R. Corbeil,et al.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go , 2008, British journal of pharmacology.

[84]  J M Blaney,et al.  A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[85]  Marc A. Martí-Renom,et al.  The AnnoLite and AnnoLyze programs for comparative annotation of protein structures , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[86]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  ZINC - A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[87]  John J Irwin,et al.  Here Be Dragons: Docking and Screening in an Uncharted Region of Chemical Space , 2005, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[88]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Chemoinformatics : concepts, methods, and tools for drug discovery , 2004 .

[89]  Alexandre Varnek,et al.  Chemoinformatics approaches to virtual screening , 2008 .

[90]  C. Dominguez,et al.  HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[91]  James Na,et al.  Design of screening collections for successful fragment-based lead discovery. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[92]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[93]  Guillermo Moyna,et al.  Shape signatures: a new approach to computer-aided ligand- and receptor-based drug design. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[94]  Richard D. Taylor,et al.  Modeling water molecules in protein-ligand docking using GOLD. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[95]  J. Mestres,et al.  Similarity versus docking in 3D virtual screening , 2000 .

[96]  Todd J. A. Ewing,et al.  DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[97]  Xiaoqin Zou,et al.  Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein-ligand docking: recent advances and future directions. , 2010, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[98]  R. Glen,et al.  Molecular similarity: a key technique in molecular informatics. , 2004, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.

[99]  Ajay N. Jain Effects of protein conformation in docking: improved pose prediction through protein pocket adaptation , 2009, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[100]  Colin McMartin,et al.  QXP: Powerful, rapid computer algorithms for structure-based drug design , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[101]  Hwangseo Park,et al.  Discovery of novel Cdc25 phosphatase inhibitors with micromolar activity based on the structure-based virtual screening. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[102]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Structure-Based Rational Screening of Novel Hit Compounds with Structural Diversity for Cytochrome P450 Sterol 14α-Demethylase from Penicillium digitatum , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[103]  Ajay N. Jain Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[104]  Johann Gasteiger,et al.  Handbook of Chemoinformatics , 2003 .

[105]  Xiaoqin Zou,et al.  Inclusion of Solvation and Entropy in the Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein-Ligand Interactions , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[106]  Fergal P. Casey,et al.  Discovery of Small Molecule Inhibitors of Protein-Protein Interactions Using Combined Ligand and Target Score Normalization , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[107]  Neerja Kaushik-Basu,et al.  Combining 3-D Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship with Ligand Based and Structure Based Alignment Procedures for in Silico Screening of New Hepatitis C Virus NS5B Polymerase Inhibitors , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[108]  Luc Morin-Allory,et al.  Optimization and validation of a docking-scoring protocol; application to virtual screening for COX-2 inhibitors. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[109]  Rafał Kurczab,et al.  The development and validation of a novel virtual screening cascade protocol to identify potential serotonin 5-HT(7)R antagonists. , 2010, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[110]  R. Friesner,et al.  Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[111]  Wei-liang Zhu,et al.  Pharmacophore-based virtual screening versus docking-based virtual screening: a benchmark comparison against eight targets , 2009, Acta Pharmacologica Sinica.

[112]  Zhihai Liu,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on a Diverse Test Set , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[113]  Giulio Rastelli,et al.  Docking and database screening reveal new classes of Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[114]  Paulo A. Netz,et al.  Docking Studies on DNA-Ligand Interactions: Building and Application of a Protocol To Identify the Binding Mode , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[115]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  ICM—A new method for protein modeling and design: Applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation , 1994, J. Comput. Chem..

[116]  Olivier Sperandio,et al.  How to choose relevant multiple receptor conformations for virtual screening: a test case of Cdk2 and normal mode analysis , 2010, European Biophysics Journal.

[117]  C. Abad-Zapatero,et al.  The 2.2 A structure of the rRNA methyltransferase ErmC' and its complexes with cofactor and cofactor analogs: implications for the reaction mechanism. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[118]  Kiattawee Choowongkomon,et al.  Receptor-Based Virtual Screening of EGFR Kinase Inhibitors from the NCI Diversity Database , 2010, Molecules.

[119]  Egon L. Willighagen,et al.  The Blue Obelisk—Interoperability in Chemical Informatics , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[120]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[121]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[122]  Stéphanie Pérot,et al.  Druggable pockets and binding site centric chemical space: a paradigm shift in drug discovery. , 2010, Drug discovery today.

[123]  Gerhard Klebe,et al.  Fragment‐Based Lead Discovery: Screening and Optimizing Fragments for Thermolysin Inhibition , 2010, ChemMedChem.