The impact of uncertain precipitation data on insurance loss estimates using a flood catastrophe model

Catastrophe risk models used by the insurance industry are likely subject to significant uncertainty, but due to their proprietary nature and strict licensing conditions they are not available for experimentation. In addition, even if such experiments were conducted, these would not be repeatable by other researchers because commercial confidentiality issues prevent the details of proprietary catastrophe model structures from being described in public domain documents. However, such experimentation is urgently required to improve decision making in both insurance and reinsurance markets. In this paper we therefore construct our own catastrophe risk model for flooding in Dublin, Ireland, in order to assess the impact of typical precipitation data uncertainty on loss predictions. As we consider only a city region rather than a whole territory and have access to detailed data and computing resources typically unavailable to industry modellers, our model is significantly more detailed than most commercial products. The model consists of four components, a stochastic rainfall module, a hydrological and hydraulic flood hazard module, a vulnerability module, and a financial loss module. Using these we undertake a series of simulations to test the impact of driving the stochastic event generator with four different rainfall data sets: ground gauge data, gauge-corrected rainfall radar, meteorological reanalysis data (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis-Interim; ERA-Interim) and a satellite rainfall product (The Climate Prediction Center morphing method; CMORPH). Catastrophe models are unusual because they use the upper three components of the modelling chain to generate a large synthetic database of unobserved and severe loss-driving events for which estimated losses are calculated. We find the loss estimates to be more sensitive to uncertainties propagated from the driving precipitation data sets than to other uncertainties in the hazard and vulnerability modules, suggesting that the range of uncertainty within catastrophe model structures may be greater than commonly believed.

[1]  U. Germann,et al.  Radar precipitation measurement in a mountainous region , 2006 .

[2]  A. Gissing,et al.  Accounting for variability in commercial flood damage estimation , 2004 .

[3]  Konstantine P. Georgakakos,et al.  Chaos in rainfall , 1989 .

[4]  S. Bergström,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A CONCEPTUAL DETERMINISTIC RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODEL , 1973 .

[5]  A. Bárdossy Generating precipitation time series using simulated annealing , 1998 .

[6]  L. Alfieri,et al.  Seamless forecasting of extreme events on a global scale , 2013 .

[7]  J. Freer,et al.  Modelling climate impact on floods with ensemble climate projections , 2013 .

[8]  Hilary McMillan,et al.  End‐to‐end flood risk assessment: A coupled model cascade with uncertainty estimation , 2008 .

[9]  Matthias Steiner,et al.  Effect of bias adjustment and rain gauge data quality control on radar rainfall estimation , 1999 .

[10]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Improving the stability of a simple formulation of the shallow water equations for 2‐D flood modeling , 2012 .

[11]  D. Seo,et al.  Overall distributed model intercomparison project results , 2004 .

[12]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  An introduction to the European Hydrological System — Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 2: Structure of a physically-based, distributed modelling system , 1986 .

[13]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  An introduction to the European Hydrological System — Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 1: History and philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modelling system , 1986 .

[14]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  How much physical complexity is needed to model flood inundation? , 2012 .

[15]  D. I. Smith Flood damage estimation - A review of urban stage-damage curves and loss functions , 1994 .

[16]  Keith Beven,et al.  An evaluation of three stochastic rainfall models. , 2000 .

[17]  Michael Drayton,et al.  Catastrophe loss modelling of storm-surge flood risk in eastern England , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[18]  Jan Seibert,et al.  Regionalisation of parameters for a conceptual rainfall-runoff model , 1999 .

[19]  L. B. Leopold,et al.  The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications , 1953 .

[20]  Evaluation of an artificial neural network rainfall disaggregation model. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[21]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  A chaotic approach to rainfall disaggregation , 2001 .

[22]  Gareth Pender,et al.  Benchmarking of 2D hydraulic modelling packages , 2010 .

[23]  P. S. Eagleson Dynamics of flood frequency , 1972 .

[24]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  Catastrophe modeling : a new approach to managing risk , 2013 .

[25]  B. Merz,et al.  Development of FLEMOcs – a new model for the estimation of flood losses in the commercial sector , 2010 .

[26]  M. Pitt Learning lessons from the 2007 floods , 2008 .

[27]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Comparative flood damage model assessment: towards a European approach , 2012 .

[28]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  A top-down framework for watershed model evaluation and selection under uncertainty , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[29]  Alison L. Kay,et al.  Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: flood frequency in England , 2009 .

[30]  Kuolin Hsu,et al.  Intercomparison of High-Resolution Precipitation Products over Northwest Europe , 2012 .

[31]  Niko E. C. Verhoest,et al.  On the applicability of Bartlett–Lewis rectangular pulses models in the modeling of design storms at a point , 1997 .

[32]  V. Singh,et al.  The HBV model. , 1995 .

[33]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  An evaluation of the impact of model structure on hydrological modelling uncertainty for streamflow simulation , 2004 .

[34]  R. Dawson,et al.  A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment , 2003 .

[35]  J. V. Sutcliffe,et al.  A worldwide comparison of regional flood estimation methods and climate , 1997 .

[36]  J. Janowiak,et al.  CMORPH: A Method that Produces Global Precipitation Estimates from Passive Microwave and Infrared Data at High Spatial and Temporal Resolution , 2004 .

[37]  G. SCALE ISSUES IN HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING : A REVIEW , 2006 .

[38]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[39]  P. Bates,et al.  Benchmarking 2D hydraulic models for urban flooding , 2008 .

[40]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Multi-variate flood damage assessment: a tree-based data-mining approach , 2013 .

[41]  B. Merz,et al.  Flood risk curves and uncertainty bounds , 2009 .

[42]  P. Bates,et al.  Identifiability of distributed floodplain roughness values in flood extent estimation , 2005 .

[43]  P. Stott,et al.  Anthropogenic greenhouse gas contribution to flood risk in England and Wales in autumn 2000 , 2011, Nature.

[44]  P. Bates,et al.  Evaluating the effect of scale in flood inundation modelling in urban environments , 2008 .

[45]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Review article "Assessment of economic flood damage" , 2010 .

[46]  S. Lane,et al.  Urban fluvial flood modelling using a two‐dimensional diffusion‐wave treatment, part 1: mesh resolution effects , 2006 .

[47]  Marco Borga,et al.  Accuracy of radar rainfall estimates for streamflow simulation , 2002 .

[48]  Thorsten Wagener,et al.  Parameter sensitivity of a watershed-scale flood forecasting model as a function of modelling time-step , 2013 .

[49]  Julien Boé,et al.  Statistical and dynamical downscaling of the Seine basin climate for hydro‐meteorological studies , 2007 .

[50]  H. Moel,et al.  Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates , 2011 .

[51]  D. Michelson,et al.  Gauge adjustment of radar-based precipitation estimates in Europe , 2004 .

[52]  M. Acreman,et al.  A simple stochastic model of hourly rainfall for Farnborough, England , 1990 .

[53]  B. Merz,et al.  Quantification of uncertainties in flood risk assessments , 2008 .

[54]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[55]  Fred L. Ogden,et al.  Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of the conceptual HBV rainfall-runoff model: implications for parameter estimation. , 2010 .

[56]  Stephen J. Connor,et al.  Combined use of satellite estimates and rain gauge observations to generate high‐quality historical rainfall time series over Ethiopia , 2014 .

[57]  Conleth Cunnane,et al.  Modelling point rainfall occurrences with the modified Bartlett-Lewis rectangular pulses model , 1996 .

[58]  P. D. Batesa,et al.  A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation , 2000 .

[59]  Dimitri Solomatine,et al.  A novel approach to parameter uncertainty analysis of hydrological models using neural networks , 2009 .

[60]  J. L. McGuinness,et al.  A Comparison of Lysimeter-Derived Potential Evapotranspiration With Computed Values , 1972 .

[61]  P. Bates,et al.  A subgrid channel model for simulating river hydraulics and floodplain inundation over large and data sparse areas , 2012 .

[62]  Jan Seibert,et al.  Teaching hydrological modeling with a user-friendly catchment-runoff-model software package , 2012 .

[63]  C. Sampson,et al.  Benchmarking urban flood models of varying complexity and scale using high resolution terrestrial LiDAR data , 2011 .

[64]  H. Wheater,et al.  Modelling of British rainfall using a random parameter Bartlett-Lewis Rectangular Pulse Model , 1993 .

[65]  Heiko Apel,et al.  Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be? , 2009 .

[66]  B. Merz,et al.  Estimation uncertainty of direct monetary flood damage to buildings , 2004 .

[67]  Keith Beven,et al.  Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based models , 1989 .

[68]  Misgana K. Muleta,et al.  Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model , 2005 .

[69]  Keith Beven,et al.  A dynamic TOPMODEL , 2001 .

[70]  Martijn J. Booij,et al.  Catchment Variability and Parameter Estimation in Multi-Objective Regionalisation of a Rainfall–Runoff Model , 2010 .

[71]  B. Sanders,et al.  Unstructured mesh generation and landcover-based resistance for hydrodynamic modeling of urban flooding , 2008 .

[72]  Edmund C. Penning-Rowsell,et al.  The costs of the summer 2007 floods in England. , 2010 .

[73]  Nicholas J. Clifford,et al.  Classics in physical geography revisited , 1996 .

[74]  C. Sampson,et al.  Use of terrestrial laser scanning data to drive decimetric resolution urban inundation models , 2010 .

[75]  R. Nemani,et al.  Global Distribution and Density of Constructed Impervious Surfaces , 2007, Sensors.

[76]  Keith Beven,et al.  Probabilistic flood risk mapping including spatial dependence , 2013 .

[77]  Keith Beven,et al.  Flood frequency prediction for data limited catchments in the Czech Republic using a stochastic rainfall model and TOPMODEL , 1997 .

[78]  P. Bates,et al.  A simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling. , 2010 .

[79]  B. Sanders,et al.  Two-dimensional, high-resolution modeling of urban dam-break flooding: A case study of Baldwin Hills, California , 2009 .

[80]  Keith Beven,et al.  Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation for a gauged upland catchment (with uncertainty) , 1999 .

[81]  Eric Gaume,et al.  Rainfall stochastic disaggregation models: Calibration and validation of a multiplicative cascade model , 2007 .

[82]  B. Gouldby,et al.  A methodology for regional-scale flood risk assessment , 2008 .

[83]  Edmund C. Penning-Rowsell,et al.  The benefits of flood and coastal risk management: a manual of assessment techniques (Multi-Coloured Handbook 2005) , 2005 .