Subjective and objective speech intelligibility investigations in primary school classrooms.

This work concerns speech intelligibility tests and measurements in three primary schools in Italy, one of which was conducted before and after an acoustical treatment. Speech intelligibility scores (IS) with different reverberation times (RT) and types of noise were obtained using diagnostic rhyme tests on 983 pupils from grades 2-5 (nominally 7-10 year olds), and these scores were then correlated with the Speech Transmission Index (STI). The grade 2 pupils understood fewer words in the lower STI range than the pupils in the higher grades, whereas an IS of ~97% was achieved by all the grades with a STI of 0.9. In the presence of traffic noise, which resulted the most interfering noise, a decrease in RT from 1.6 to 0.4 s determined an IS increase on equal A-weighted speech-to-noise level difference, S/N(A), which varied from 13% to 6%, over the S/N(A) range of -15 to +6 dB, respectively. In the case of babble noise, whose source was located in the middle of the classroom, the same decrease in reverberation time leads to a negligible variation in IS over a similar S/N(A) range.

[1]  Tammo Houtgast,et al.  The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  I. D. Griffiths,et al.  Subjective response to road traffic noise , 1968 .

[3]  Murray Hodgson,et al.  Auralization study of optimum reverberation times for speech intelligibility for normal and hearing-impaired listeners in classrooms with diffuse sound fields. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  A. Ellis,et al.  Context-sensitive rules and word naming in Italian children , 2007 .

[5]  T. Houtgast The effect of ambient noise on speech intelligibility in classrooms , 1981 .

[6]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  The intelligibility of speech in elementary school classrooms. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  Speech intelligibility studies in classrooms. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  I. Bork,et al.  A comparison of room simulation software - The 2nd round robin on room acoustical computer simulation , 2000 .

[10]  A. Neuman,et al.  Children's perception of speech in reverberation. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Nicola Prodi,et al.  Intelligibility, listening difficulty and listening efficiency in auralized classrooms. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Carol Flexer,et al.  The Impact of Classroom Acoustics: Listening, Learning, and Literacy , 2004 .

[13]  L. L. Elliott Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Murray Hodgson,et al.  Effect of noise and occupancy on optimal reverberation times for speech intelligibility in classrooms. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Joel T. Kalb,et al.  English verification of the STI method for estimating speech intelligibility of a communications channel , 1987 .