TeleMIP: telecommunications-enhanced mobile IP architecture for fast intradomain mobility

This article first surveys existing protocols for supporting IP mobility and then proposes an extension to the mobile IP architecture, called TeleMIP. Our architecture attempts to achieve smaller handoff latency by localizing the scope of most location update messages within an administrative domain or a geographical region. TeleMIP is intended for use in evolving third-generation wireless networks, and introduces a new logical entity, called the mobility agent, which provides a mobile node with a stable point of attachment in a foreign network. While the MA is functionally similar to conventional foreign agents, it is located at a higher level in the network hierarchy than the subnet-specific FAs. Location updates for intradomain mobility are localized only up to the MA; transmission of global location updates are necessary only when the mobile changes administrative domains and/or geographical regions. By permitting the use of private or locally scoped addresses for handling intradomain mobility, TeleMIP allows efficient use of public address space. Also, by reducing the frequency of global update messages, our architecture overcomes several drawbacks of existing protocols, such as large latencies in location updates, higher likelihood of loss of binding update messages, and loss of inflight packets, and thus provides better mobility support for real-time services and applications. The dynamic creation of mobility agents (in TeleMLP) permits the use of load balancing schemes for the efficient management of network resources.

[1]  Ramón Cáceres,et al.  Fast and scalable wireless handoffs in support of mobile Internet audio , 1998, Mob. Networks Appl..

[2]  Mary Baker,et al.  Flexible network support for mobility , 1998, MobiCom '98.

[3]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  IMHP: A Mobile Host Protocol for the Internet , 1994, Comput. Networks ISDN Syst..

[4]  András Gergely Valkó,et al.  Cellular IP: a new approach to Internet host mobility , 1999, CCRV.

[5]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  IP Encapsulation within IP , 1996, RFC.

[6]  Henning Schulzrinne,et al.  Mobility support using SIP , 1999, WOWMOM '99.

[7]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  The Effect of Using Co-Located Care-of Addresses on Macro Handover Latency , 1998 .

[8]  Satish K. Tripathi,et al.  Network layer mobility: an architecture and survey , 1996, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[9]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobile IP Network Access Identifier Extension for IPv4 , 2000, RFC.

[10]  Mark Handley,et al.  SIP: Session Initiation Protocol , 1999, RFC.

[11]  Masami Yabusaki,et al.  IMT-2000 standards: network aspects , 1997, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[12]  Gerard Roca Mallofre Resource Reservation Protocol ( RSVP ) , 2022 .

[13]  John Reece,et al.  General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) , 2002 .

[14]  Gabriel Montenegro Reverse Tunneling for Mobile IP , 1998, RFC.

[15]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Mobility Management in Next Generation Wireless Systems , 1999, ICCCN.

[16]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  IP Mobility Support , 1996, RFC.

[17]  Ralph E. Droms,et al.  Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol , 1993, RFC.

[18]  Ramón Cáceres,et al.  Fast and scalable handoffs for wireless internetworks , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[19]  Janise McNair,et al.  Mobility management in current and future communications networks , 1998, IEEE Netw..

[20]  David McFarlane,et al.  IMT-2000: service provider's perspective , 1997, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[21]  Ramachandran Ramjee,et al.  IP Micro-Mobility Support Using HAWAII , 1999 .

[22]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobility support in IPv6 , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[23]  Vipul Gupta,et al.  Sun's SKIP Firewall Traversal for Mobile IP , 1998, RFC.