Directional effects of changes in muscle torques on initial path during simulated reaching movements

Abstract Adults are able to reach for an object for the first time with appropriate direction, speed, and accuracy. The rules by which the nervous system is able to set muscle activities to accomplish these outcomes are still debated and, indeed, the sensitivity of kinematics to variations in muscle torques is unknown for complex arm movements. As a result, this study used computer simulations to characterize the effects of change in muscle torque on initial hand path. The same change was applied to movements towards 12 directions in the horizontal plane, and changes were systematically manipulated such that: (1) torque amplitude was changed at one joint, (2) timing of torque was changed at one joint, and (3) amplitude and/or timing was changed at two joints. Results showed that simultaneous changes in torque amplitude at shoulder and elbow joints affected initial speed uniformly across direction. These results add to conclusions from previous experimental and modeling work that the simplest rule to produce a desired change in speed for any direction is to scale torque amplitude at both joints. In contrast, all simulations showed nonuniform effects on initial path direction. For some regions of the workspace, initial path direction was little affected by either a ±30% change in amplitude or a ±100-ms change in timing, whereas for other regions the same changes produced large effects on initial path direction. These findings suggest that the range of possible torque solutions to achieve a particular initial path direction varies within the workspace and, consequently, the requirements for an accurate initial path will vary within the workspace.

[1]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[2]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Directional control of planar human arm movement. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Constrained and unconstrained movements involve different control strategies. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  F. Zajac,et al.  Determining Muscle's Force and Action in Multi‐Articular Movement , 1989, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[5]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Flanders Temporal patterns of muscle activation for arm movements in three- dimensional space , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Flanders,et al.  Arm movements in three-dimensional space: computation, theory, and observation. , 1991, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[8]  J R Flanagan,et al.  The Role of Internal Models in Motion Planning and Control: Evidence from Grip Force Adjustments during Movements of Hand-Held Loads , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Strategies for the control of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Coordinating movement at two joints: a principle of linear covariance. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Evaluating an integrated musculoskeletal model of the human arm. , 1997, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  C. Atkeson,et al.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  C. Ghez,et al.  Discrete and continuous planning of hand movements and isometric force trajectories , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Otmar Bock,et al.  Scaling of joint torque during planar arm movements , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[16]  Z. Hasan,et al.  Timing and magnitude of electromyographic activity for two-joint arm movements in different directions. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  J. Cooke,et al.  Amplitude‐ and instruction‐dependent modulation of movement‐related electromyogram activity in humans. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  D A Hong,et al.  Coordinating two degrees of freedom during human arm movement: load and speed invariance of relative joint torques. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation. , 1988, Psychological review.

[20]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  Julie Messier,et al.  Differential effect of task conditions on errors of direction and extent of reaching movements , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  E. Thelen,et al.  The transition to reaching: mapping intention and intrinsic dynamics. , 1993, Child development.

[23]  M. A. Arbib,et al.  Models of Trajectory Formation and Temporal Interaction of Reach and Grasp. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[24]  Jack M. Winters,et al.  Modeling Musculoskeletal Movement Systems: Joint and Body Segmental Dynamics, Musculoskeletal Actuation, and Neuromuscular Control , 1990 .

[25]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Muscle activation patterns for reaching: the representation of distance and time. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Effect of load perturbations on EMG activity and trajectories of pointing movements , 1988, Brain Research.

[27]  Daniel Bullock,et al.  Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation , 1988 .