Evaluating simulated primary anthropogenic and biomass burning organic aerosols during MILAGRO: implications for assessing treatments of secondary organic aerosols

Abstract. Simulated primary organic aerosols (POA), as well as other particulates and trace gases, in the vicinity of Mexico City are evaluated using measurements collected during the 2006 Megacity Initiative: Local and Global Research Observations (MILAGRO) field campaigns. Since the emission inventories, transport, and turbulent mixing will directly affect predictions of total organic matter and consequently total particulate matter, our objective is to assess the uncertainties in predicted POA before testing and evaluating the performance of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) treatments. Carbon monoxide (CO) is well simulated on most days both over the city and downwind, indicating that transport and mixing processes were usually consistent with the meteorological conditions observed during MILAGRO. Predicted and observed elemental carbon (EC) in the city was similar, but larger errors occurred at remote locations since the overall CO/EC emission ratios in the national emission inventory were lower than in the metropolitan emission inventory. Components of organic aerosols derived from Positive Matrix Factorization of data from several Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer instruments deployed both at ground sites and on research aircraft are used to evaluate the model. Modeled POA was consistently lower than the measured organic matter at the ground sites, which is consistent with the expectation that SOA should be a large fraction of the total organic matter mass. A much better agreement was found when modeled POA was compared with the sum of "primary anthropogenic" and "biomass burning" components derived from Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) on most days, especially at the surface sites, suggesting that the overall magnitude of primary organic particulates released was reasonable. However, simulated POA from anthropogenic sources was often lower than "primary anthropogenic" components derived from PMF, consistent with two recent reports that these emissions are underestimated. The modeled POA was greater than the total observed organic matter when the aircraft flew directly downwind of large fires, suggesting that biomass burning emission estimates from some large fires may be too high.

[1]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Detection of particle-phase polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Mexico City using an aerosol mass spectrometer , 2007 .

[2]  Kenneth A. Smith,et al.  Transmission Efficiency of an Aerodynamic Focusing Lens System: Comparison of Model Calculations and Laboratory Measurements for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer , 2007 .

[3]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Modeling Organic Aerosols during MILAGRO: Application of the CHIMERE Model and Importance of Biogenic Secondary Organic Aerosols , 2009 .

[4]  G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 , 2008 .

[5]  S. Herndon,et al.  Total Observed Organic Carbon (TOOC): A synthesis of North American observations , 2007 .

[6]  W. Hao,et al.  Emissions from forest fires near Mexico City , 2007 .

[7]  M. Molina,et al.  Air Quality in the Mexico Megacity , 2002 .

[8]  Edward Charles Fortner,et al.  Mexico City Aerosol Analysis during MILAGRO using High Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometry , 2009 .

[9]  J. Jimenez,et al.  Mexico City Aerosol Analysis during MILAGRO using High Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometry , 2009 .

[10]  R. Volkamer,et al.  Modelling constraints on the emission inventory and on vertical dispersion for CO and SO 2 in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area using Solar FTIR and zenith sky UV spectroscopy , 2006 .

[11]  D. R. Worsnop,et al.  Hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols in Pittsburgh: insights into sources and processes of organic aerosols , 2005 .

[12]  M. Molina,et al.  Secondary organic aerosol formation from anthropogenic air pollution: Rapid and higher than expected , 2006 .

[13]  J. Frederick,et al.  Measurements of aerosol absorption and scattering in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area during the MILAGRO field campaign: a comparison of results from the T0 and T1 sites , 2008 .

[14]  James M. Roberts,et al.  Budget of organic carbon in a polluted atmosphere: Results from the New England Air Quality Study in 2002 , 2005 .

[15]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Gas/Particle Partitioning and Secondary Organic Aerosol Yields , 1996 .

[16]  Leonard K. Peters,et al.  A new lumped structure photochemical mechanism for large‐scale applications , 1999 .

[17]  L. Molina,et al.  Basin-scale wind transport during the MILAGRO field campaign and comparison to climatology using cluster analysis , 2007 .

[18]  Christoph Hueglin,et al.  Source apportionment of submicron organic aerosols at an urban site by factor analytical modelling of aerosol mass spectra , 2007 .

[19]  R. Turco,et al.  Modeling coagulation among particles of different composition and size , 1994 .

[20]  Thomas T. Warner,et al.  IMPLEMENTATION OF OBSERVATION-NUDGING BASED FDDA INTO WRF FOR SUPPORTING ATEC TEST OPERATIONS , 2005 .

[21]  Louisa Emmons,et al.  © Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Fast airborne aerosol size and chemistry measurements above , 2008 .

[22]  I. J. Ackermann,et al.  Modeling the formation of secondary organic aerosol within a comprehensive air quality model system , 2001 .

[23]  Steven J. Ghan,et al.  Impact on modeled cloud characteristics due to simplified treatment of uniform cloud condensation nuclei during NEAQS 2004 , 2007 .

[24]  U. Baltensperger,et al.  Source apportionment of submicron organic aerosols at an urban background site by positive matrix factorization (PMF) applied to aerosol mass spectra , 2007 .

[25]  Charles E. Kolb,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Technical Note: Use of a Beam Width Probe in an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer to Monitor Particle Collection Efficiency in the Field , 2022 .

[26]  S. Madronich,et al.  Characteristics of the NO-NO 2 -O 3 system in different chemical regimes during the MIRAGE-Mex field campaign , 2008 .

[27]  E. Kassianov,et al.  The T1-T2 study: evolution of aerosol properties downwind of Mexico City , 2020 .

[28]  Manvendra K. Dubey,et al.  Correlation of secondary organic aerosol with odd oxygen in Mexico City , 2008 .

[29]  J. Leal.  Luisa T. Molina y Mario J. Molina (eds.). Air quality in the Mexico megacity. An integrated assessment. , 2006 .

[30]  G. Grell,et al.  Evolution of ozone, particulates, and aerosol direct radiative forcing in the vicinity of Houston using a fully coupled meteorology‐chemistry‐aerosol model , 2006 .

[31]  S. Madronich,et al.  Evaluation of new secondary organic aerosol models for a case study in Mexico City , 2008 .

[32]  Allen L Robinson,et al.  Rethinking Organic Aerosols: Semivolatile Emissions and Photochemical Aging , 2007, Science.

[33]  Aron D. Jazcilevich,et al.  A study of air flow patterns affecting pollutant concentrations in the Central Region of Mexico , 2003 .

[34]  Douglas R. Worsnop,et al.  Laboratory and Ambient Particle Density Determinations using Light Scattering in Conjunction with Aerosol Mass Spectrometry , 2007 .

[35]  Yutaka Kondo,et al.  Oxygenated and water‐soluble organic aerosols in Tokyo , 2007 .

[36]  R. Vautard,et al.  Aerosol chemical and optical properties over the Paris area within ESQUIF project , 2006 .

[37]  M. Memmesheimer,et al.  Modal aerosol dynamics model for Europe: development and first applications , 1998 .

[38]  Roy M Harrison,et al.  Sources and properties of non-exhaust particulate matter from road traffic: a review. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[39]  F. Binkowski,et al.  The Regional Particulate Matter Model 1. Model description and preliminary results , 1995 .

[40]  Xiaoyang Zhang,et al.  Estimating emissions from fires in North America for air quality modeling , 2006 .

[41]  M. Molina,et al.  Air quality in the Mexico megacity : an integrated assessment , 2002 .

[42]  Oliver Wild,et al.  Fast-J: Accurate Simulation of In- and Below-Cloud Photolysis in Tropospheric Chemical Models , 2000 .

[43]  Mar Viana,et al.  Spatial and chemical patterns of PM10 in road dust deposited in urban environment , 2009 .

[44]  C. Sarrata,et al.  Impact of urban heat island on regional atmospheric pollution , 2006 .

[45]  Louisa Emmons,et al.  Contribution of isoprene to chemical budgets: A model tracer study with the NCAR CTM MOZART-4 , 2008 .

[46]  Jian Wang,et al.  The time evolution of aerosol composition over the Mexico City plateau , 2007 .

[47]  M. Santee,et al.  Comparison of ClO measurements from the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder to ground‐based microwave measurements at Scott Base, Antarctica, in spring 2005 , 2007 .

[48]  J. Jimenez,et al.  Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data , 2008 .

[49]  Kaarle Kupiainen,et al.  Modeling carbonaceous aerosol over Europe: Analysis of the CARBOSOL and EMEP EC/OC campaigns , 2007 .

[50]  Thomas W. Kirchstetter,et al.  Emissions From Miombo Woodland and Dambo Grassland Savanna Fires in Southern Africa , 2003 .

[51]  J. Allan,et al.  Evolution of anthropogenic pollution at the top of the regional mixed layer in the central Mexico plateau , 2009 .

[52]  B. de Foy,et al.  Characterizing ozone production in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area: a case study using a chemical transport model , 2006 .

[53]  Georg A. Grell,et al.  Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model , 2005 .

[54]  Douglas R. Worsnop,et al.  Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 1: Theory , 2004 .

[55]  Anthony S. Wexler,et al.  Modelling urban and regional aerosols—I. model development , 1994 .

[56]  Katrin Fuhrer,et al.  Field-deployable, high-resolution, time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[57]  Charles E. Kolb,et al.  Air quality in North America's most populous city - overview of the MCMA-2003 campaign , 2007 .

[58]  J. Alex Huffman,et al.  Development and Characterization of a Fast-Stepping/Scanning Thermodenuder for Chemically-Resolved Aerosol Volatility Measurements , 2008 .

[59]  Timothy Martin,et al.  The daytime mixing layer observed by radiosonde, profiler, and lidar during MILAGRO , 2007 .

[60]  Jerome D. Fast,et al.  Model for Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC) , 2008 .

[61]  Douglas R. Worsnop,et al.  Chemically-resolved aerosol volatility measurements from two megacity field studies , 2009 .

[62]  J C Chow,et al.  Particulate Air Pollution in Mexico City: A Collaborative Research Project. , 1999, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[63]  P. Ziemann,et al.  Chemically-resolved volatility measurements of organic aerosol fom different sources. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[64]  Qi Zhang,et al.  O/C and OM/OC ratios of primary, secondary, and ambient organic aerosols with high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometry. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[65]  D. Blake,et al.  Emission and chemistry of organic carbon in the gas and aerosol phase at a sub-urban site near Mexico City in March 2006 during the MILAGRO study , 2008 .

[66]  M. Molina,et al.  Comparative analysis of urban atmospheric aerosol by particle-induced X-ray emission (PIXE), proton elastic scattering analysis (PESA), and aerosol mass spectrometry (AMS). , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[67]  C E Kolb,et al.  Guest Editor: Albert Viggiano CHEMICAL AND MICROPHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF AMBIENT AEROSOLS WITH THE AERODYNE AEROSOL MASS SPECTROMETER , 2022 .

[68]  L. Molina,et al.  Trace gas and particle emissions from domestic and industrial biofuel use and garbage burning in central Mexico , 2009 .

[69]  M. Viana,et al.  PM speciation and sources in Mexico during the MILAGRO-2006 Campaign , 2007 .

[70]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Ubiquity and dominance of oxygenated species in organic aerosols in anthropogenically‐influenced Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes , 2007 .

[71]  Charles E. Kolb,et al.  Characterization of ambient aerosols in Mexico City during the MCMA-2003 campaign with Aerosol Mass Spectrometry: results from the CENICA Supersite , 2006 .

[72]  Naifang Bei,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Using 3dvar Data Assimilation System to Improve Ozone Simulations in the Mexico City Basin , 2022 .

[73]  S. Herndon,et al.  Total observed organic carbon (TOOC) in the atmosphere: a synthesis of North American observations , 2008 .

[74]  Steven J. Ghan,et al.  Coupling aerosol-cloud-radiative processes in the WRF-Chem model: Investigating the radiative impact of elevated point sources , 2008 .

[75]  Bonyoung Koo,et al.  Integrated approaches to modeling the organic and inorganic atmospheric aerosol components , 2003 .

[76]  A. Robinson,et al.  Laboratory investigation of photochemical oxidation of organic aerosol from wood fires 2: analysis of aerosol mass spectrometer data , 2008 .

[77]  L. Molina.  Overview of MILAGRO/ INTEX-B Campaign , 2008 .

[78]  James C. Barnard,et al.  Applications of lagrangian dispersion modeling to the analysis of changes in the specific absorption of elemental carbon , 2008 .

[79]  S. Zhong,et al.  Meteorological factors associated with inhomogeneous ozone concentrations within the Mexico City basin , 1998 .

[80]  James Allan,et al.  Characterization of an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS): Intercomparison with Other Aerosol Instruments , 2005 .

[81]  J. Barnard,et al.  © Author(s) 2007. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics A meteorological overview of the MILAGRO field campaigns , 2007 .

[82]  B. de Foy,et al.  Satellite-derived land surface parameters for mesoscale modelling of the Mexico City basin , 2005 .