Establishment of a New Quantitative Evaluation Model of the Targets’ Geometry Distribution for Terrestrial Laser Scanning

The precision of target-based registration is related to the geometry distribution of targets, while the current method of setting the targets mainly depends on experience, and the impact is only evaluated qualitatively by the findings from empirical experiments and through simulations. In this paper, we propose a new quantitative evaluation model, which is comprised of the rotation dilution of precision (rDOP, assessing the impact of targets’ geometry distribution on the rotation parameters) and the translation dilution of precision (tDOP, assessing the impact of targets’ geometry distribution on the translation parameters). Here, the definitions and derivation of relevant formulas of the rDOP and tDOP are given, the experience conclusions are theoretically proven by the model of rDOP and tDOP, and an accurate method for determining the optimal placement location of targets and the scanner is proposed by calculating the minimum value of rDOP and tDOP. Furthermore, we can refer to the model (rDOP and tDOP) as a unified model of the geometric distribution evaluation model, which includes the DOP model in GPS.

[1]  R. Yarlagadda,et al.  GPS GDOP metric , 2000 .

[2]  Alan Dodson,et al.  Impact of GPS satellite and pseudolite geometry on structural deformation monitoring: analytical and empirical studies , 2004 .

[3]  Bi Yu Chen,et al.  An analytical approach to evaluate point cloud registration error utilizing targets , 2018, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Fulvio Rinaudo,et al.  Multiple scan registration in LIDAR close-range applications , 2003 .

[5]  M. Menenti,et al.  Scanning geometry: Influencing factor on the quality of terrestrial laser scanning points , 2011 .

[6]  Sang Wook Lee,et al.  Multiview registration of 3D scenes by minimizing error between coordinate frames , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Heiner Kuhlmann,et al.  Decreasing the Uncertainty of the Target Center Estimation at Terrestrial Laser Scanning by Choosing the Best Algorithm and by Improving the Target Design , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[8]  Yuriy Reshetyuk,et al.  Self-calibration and direct georeferencing in terrestrial laser scanning , 2009 .

[9]  Wendy Flores-Fuentes,et al.  Combined application of Power Spectrum Centroid and Support Vector Machines for measurement improvement in Optical Scanning Systems , 2014, Signal Process..

[10]  Si Shunjie Study on the Minimum of GDOP in Satellite Navigation and Its Applications , 2011 .

[11]  Wendy Flores-Fuentes,et al.  Improve a 3D distance measurement accuracy in stereo vision systems using optimization methods’ approach , 2017 .

[12]  Hao Xu,et al.  Registration of Laser Scanning Point Clouds: A Review , 2018, Sensors.

[13]  Robert B. Fisher,et al.  Estimating 3-D rigid body transformations: a comparison of four major algorithms , 1997, Machine Vision and Applications.

[14]  Bruce R. Harvey REGISTRATION AND TRANSFORMATION OF MULTIPLE SITE TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING , 2004 .

[15]  D. Lichti,et al.  TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNERS WITH A NARROW FIELD OF VIEW: THE EFFECT ON 3D RESECTION SOLUTIONS , 2004 .

[16]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Error in target-based georeferencing and registration in terrestrial laser scanning , 2015, Comput. Geosci..