Dolutegravir as maintenance monotherapy for HIV (DOMONO): a phase 2, randomised non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND The high genetic barrier to resistance of dolutegravir might allow for its use as maintenance monotherapy in patients with HIV. We investigated whether dolutegravir monotherapy was non-inferior to combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) for maintaining virological suppression in patients with HIV-1 infection successfully treated with combination ART. METHODS We did this open-label, phase 2, randomised non-inferiority trial at two medical centres in the Netherlands. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) were on combination ART, had been virologically suppressed (HIV RNA <50 copies per mL) for at least 6 months, and had CD4 nadirs of 200 cells per μL or higher, HIV RNA zeniths of 100 000 copies per mL or less, and no history of virological failure. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), via a web-based block randomisation method (variable block sizes of 4 and 6), to switch to dolutegravir monotherapy (50 mg once a day) either immediately or after a delay of 24 weeks of continued combination ART. Randomisation was stratified by HIV RNA zenith (<50 000 copies per mL vs 50 000-99 999 copies per mL). Investigators and patients were not masked to group allocation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA viral loads of less than 200 copies per mL at week 24, with a non-inferiority margin of 12%. We did analyses in the on-treatment and intention-to-treat populations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02401828. FINDINGS Between March 10, 2015, and Feb 4, 2016, we randomly assigned 51 patients to the immediate switch group and 53 patients to the delayed switch group. One patient who received immediate monotherapy discontinued treatment at week 12 because of disturbed sleep. At week 24, dolutegravir monotherapy was non-inferior to combination ART, with plasma HIV RNA loads of 200 copies per mL or higher observed in 2% (1/50) of patients in the immediate switch group and in no patients in the delayed switch group (difference 2%, 95% CI -5 to 12). Of patients assigned to the delayed switch group, 47 (89%) switched to dolutegravir monotherapy at week 24, two (4%) of whom subsequently discontinued monotherapy because of headache (n=1) and disturbed sleep (n=1). Eight (8%) of the 95 patients who remained on dolutegravir monotherapy had virological failure; all had therapeutic plasma concentrations of dolutegravir. In three (38%) of the eight patients, mutations associated with resistance were detected in the integrase gene. According to a predefined stopping rule, detection of these mutations led to premature study discontinuation. INTERPRETATION Dolutegravir monotherapy was non-inferior to combination ART at 24 weeks. However, virological failure continued to occur thereafter and led to dolutegravir resistance. Dolutegravir should not be used as maintenance monotherapy. FUNDING Erasmus Trustfonds.

[1]  Clare Brennan,et al.  Once-daily dolutegravir versus raltegravir in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection: 48 week results from the randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority SPRING-2 study , 2013, The Lancet.

[2]  M. Wainberg,et al.  Clinical benefit of dolutegravir in HIV-1 management related to the high genetic barrier to drug resistance. , 2017, Virus research.

[3]  J. Gatell,et al.  Dolutegravir monotherapy in HIV-infected patients with sustained viral suppression. , 2016, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[4]  E. Wolf,et al.  Dolutegravir Monotherapy as Treatment De-Escalation in HIV-Infected Adults with Virological Control: DoluMono Cohort Results , 2016, Antiviral therapy.

[5]  P. Dellamonica,et al.  NNRTIs: pharmacological data. , 2012, Medecine et maladies infectieuses.

[6]  D. Podzamczer,et al.  Brief Report: Dolutegravir Plus Abacavir/Lamivudine for the Treatment of HIV-1 Infection in Antiretroviral Therapy-Naive Patients: Week 96 and Week 144 Results From the SINGLE Randomized Clinical Trial , 2015, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[7]  A. Winston,et al.  Efficacy of protease inhibitor monotherapy vs. triple therapy: meta‐analysis of data from 2303 patients in 13 randomized trials , 2016, HIV medicine.

[8]  P. Cahn,et al.  Dolutegravir versus raltegravir in antiretroviral-experienced, integrase-inhibitor-naive adults with HIV: week 48 results from the randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority SAILING study , 2013, The Lancet.

[9]  B. Clotet,et al.  Once-daily dolutegravir is superior to once-daily darunavir/ritonavir in treatment-naïve HIV-1-positive individuals: 96 week results from FLAMINGO , 2014, Journal of the International AIDS Society.

[10]  K. Hertogs,et al.  Resistance Mutations in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Integrase Selected with Elvitegravir Confer Reduced Susceptibility to a Wide Range of Integrase Inhibitors , 2008, Journal of Virology.

[11]  C. Rouzioux,et al.  Total HIV-1 DNA, a Marker of Viral Reservoir Dynamics with Clinical Implications , 2016, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[12]  L. Hocqueloux,et al.  Dolutegravir-based monotherapy or dual therapy maintains a high proportion of viral suppression even in highly experienced HIV-1-infected patients , 2015, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

[13]  Alan S Perelson,et al.  Persistent HIV-1 replication is associated with lower antiretroviral drug concentrations in lymphatic tissues , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  V. Calvez,et al.  Dolutegravir as monotherapy in HIV-1-infected individuals with suppressed HIV viraemia. , 2016, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[15]  R. Elston,et al.  Changes in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag at Positions L449 and P453 Are Linked to I50V Protease Mutants In Vivo and Cause Reduction of Sensitivity to Amprenavir and Improved Viral Fitness In Vitro , 2002, Journal of Virology.

[16]  M. Wainberg,et al.  Resistance against Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors and Relevance to HIV Persistence , 2015, Viruses.

[17]  J. J. Henning,et al.  Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents, January 28, 2000 , 1998, HIV clinical trials.

[18]  V. Calvez,et al.  Factors associated with virological failure in HIV-1-infected patients receiving darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy. , 2011, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[19]  A. Antinori,et al.  Week 96 efficacy and safety of darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy vs. darunavir/ritonavir with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in the PROTEA trial , 2017, HIV medicine.

[20]  Weizhen Wang On construction of the smallest one-sided confidence interval for the difference of two proportions , 2010, 1002.4945.

[21]  C. Boucher,et al.  Dolutegravir as maintenance monotherapy: first experiences in HIV-1 patients. , 2016, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[22]  A. Antinori,et al.  The PROTEA trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL , 2014, Journal of the International AIDS Society.