VAS and NRS, Same or Different? Are Visual Analog Scale Values and Numerical Rating Scale Equally Viable Tools for Assessing Patients after Microdiscectomy?

Objectives To compare the viability of the numerical rating scale (NRS) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) as a pain assessment tools among a large cohort of patients who underwent microdiscectomy. Summary of Background Data. The pain intensity (PI) reduction is a parameter of surgical treatment efficacy. The two most commonly used scales of PI are NRS and VAS. Many studies have shown strong similarities between those two scales, but the direct interchange is difficult. Methods Patients, who underwent microdiscectomy, were prospectively enrolled into the study and assessed using VAS and NRS for the back (NRS-B) and the leg (NRS-L), Short Form of McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) included Pain Rating Index (PRI) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 1 day before and 1 month and 3 months after the procedure. Results 131 patients were included in the study. NRS-L, NRS-B, VAS, and ODI were significantly lower (p < 0.001) 1 month after microdiscectomy. NRS-L and NRS-B ratings remained at a similar level while VAS and ODI decreased after 3 months. The rate of decline of PI measured by NRS-L correlated statistically significant (rs = 0.366; p < 0.001) with ODI 1 month after surgery. Before surgery, the most significant correlation was found between ODI and NRS-L (rs = 0.494; p < 0.001), the lowest with NRS-B (rs = 0.319; p < 0.001). 3 months after surgery, there was higher correlations between ODI and VAS (rs = 0.634) than NRS-L (rs = 0.265). PRI correlated significantly (p < 0.001) and more stronger with VAS than with NRS-L and NRS-B in every points of assessment. Conclusion The results showed that PI measurements by NRS-L/NRS-B and VAS mutually correlate and impair functionality evaluated by ODI (convergent validity) but in different modes (differential validity). NRS and VAS are not parallel scales and assess different aspects of pain. The measurement of NRS-L 1 month after microdiscectomy seems to give quick insight into the effectiveness of the procedure.

[1]  Jian Sun,et al.  Comparison of effectiveness and safety between epidural anesthesia vs local anesthesia for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy , 2020, Medicine.

[2]  John L. Parker,et al.  Long-term safety and efficacy of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation to treat chronic back and leg pain (Evoke): a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial , 2019, The Lancet Neurology.

[3]  R. Baron,et al.  Sensory symptoms in low back pain—how do they matter? , 2018, Current medical research and opinion.

[4]  R. Ostelo,et al.  Determination of the Oswestry Disability Index score equivalent to a "satisfactory symptom state" in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine-a Spine Tango registry-based study. , 2016, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[5]  R. Fillingim,et al.  Assessment of Chronic Pain: Domains, Methods, and Mechanisms. , 2016, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[6]  R. Baron,et al.  Mechanism-based therapy for neuropathic pain-a concept in danger? , 2015, Pain.

[7]  Blair H. Smith,et al.  Neuropathic pain phenotyping by international consensus (NeuroPPIC) for genetic studies: a NeuPSIG systematic review, Delphi survey, and expert panel recommendations , 2015, Pain.

[8]  Safdar N. Khan,et al.  A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain , 2015, Acta orthopaedica.

[9]  Augusto Caraceni,et al.  Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. , 2011, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[10]  D. Bouhassira,et al.  All in one: Is it possible to assess all dimensions of any pain with a simple questionnaire? , 2009, PAIN®.

[11]  B. Hoggart,et al.  Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. , 2005, Journal of clinical nursing.

[12]  P. Watson,et al.  The development and validation of a Greek version of the short‐form McGill Pain Questionnaire , 2000, European journal of pain.

[13]  Judith K. Waalen,et al.  Response set bias, internal consistency and construct validity of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire , 1998 .

[14]  J C Fairbank,et al.  The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. , 1980, Physiotherapy.

[15]  R. Melzack.  The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods , 1975, PAIN.

[16]  J. Fairbank.  Why are there different versions of the Oswestry Disability Index? , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[17]  Mellar P. Davis,et al.  Assessment of pain , 2005 .

[18]  A. Straube,et al.  Incidence and risk factors of persistent low back pain following posterior decompression and instrumented fusion for lumbar disk herniation , 2022 .