Reduced Spill at Hydropower Dams: Opportunities for More Generation and Increased Fish Population

This report indicates that reduction of managed spill at hydropower dams can speed implementation of technologies for fish protection and achieve economic goals. Spill of water over spillways is managed in the Columbia River basin to assist downstream-migrating juvenile salmon, and is generally believed to be the most similar to natural migration, benign and effective passage route; other routes include turbines, intake screens with bypasses, and surface bypasses. However, this belief may be misguided, because spill is becoming recognized as less than natural, with deep intakes below normal migration depths, and likely causing physical damages from severe shear on spillways, high turbulence in tail waters, and collisions with baffle blocks that lead to disorientation and predation. Some spillways induce mortalities comparable to turbines. Spill is expensive in lost generation, and controversial. Fish-passage research is leading to more fish-friendly turbines, screens and bypasses that are more effective and less damaging, and surface bypasses that offer passage of more fish per unit water volume than does spill (leaving more water for generation). Analyses by independent economists demonstrated that goals of increased fish survival over the long term and net gain to the economy can be obtained by selectively reducing spill and divertingmore » some of the income from added power generation to research, development, and installation of fish-passage technologies. Such a plan would selectively reduce spill when and where least damaging to fish, increase electricity generation using the water not spilled and use innovative financing to direct monetary gains to improving fish passage.« less

[1]  Charles C. Coutant,et al.  Fish Behavior in Relation to Passage through Hydropower Turbines: A Review , 2000 .

[2]  M. C. Bell,et al.  A compendium on the survival of fish passing through spillways and conduits , 1972 .

[3]  A. Giorgi,et al.  Mainstem Passage Strategies In the Columbia River System: Transportation, Spill, and Flow Augmentation , 2002 .

[4]  D G Murray,et al.  A review of fish response to spillways , 1983 .

[5]  Dennis W. Rondorf,et al.  Behavior and survival of radio-tagged juvenile Chinook salmon and steelhead relative to the performance of a removable spillway weir at Lower Granite Dam, Washington, 2003 , 2003 .

[6]  G F Cada,et al.  Development of biological criteria for the design of advanced hydropower turbines , 1997 .

[7]  C C Coutant.  Integrated, Multi-Sensory, Behavioral Guidance Systems for Fish Diversion , 2001 .

[8]  D. W. Rondorf,et al.  Behavior of radio-tagged juvenile Chinook salmon and steelhead and performance of a removable spillway weir at Lower Granite Dam, Washington, 2002 , 2003 .

[9]  R. S. Shively,et al.  Criteria for reducing predation by northern squawfish near juvenile salmonid bypass outfalls at Columbia River dams , 1996 .

[10]  Jill M. Hardiman,et al.  Estimates of fish and spill passage efficiency of radio-tagged juvenile steelhead, and yearling and subyearling Chinook salmon at John Day Dam, 2000 , 2003 .

[11]  J. Beeman,et al.  Estimates of fish, spill, and sluiceway passage efficiencies of radio-tagged juvenile salmonids relative to spring and summer spill treatments at John Day Dam in 2003 , 2004 .

[12]  Joanne P. Duncan,et al.  Evolution of the sensor fish device for measuring physical conditions in sever hydraulic environments , 2003 .

[13]  Charles C. Coutant,et al.  Downstream passage for salmon at hydroelectric projects in the Columbia river basin: Development, installation, and evaluation , 1997 .

[14]  John R. Skalski,et al.  Survival estimates for the passage of juvenile Chinook salmon through Snake River dams and reservoirs , 1994 .

[15]  B. H. Ransom,et al.  Monitoring the Behavior of Acoustically Tagged Chinook and Steelhead Smolts Approaching Rocky Reach Dam on the Columbia River , 2001 .

[16]  T. Counihan,et al.  Estimates of fish and spill passage efficiency of radio-tagged juvenile steelhead and yearling Chinook salmon at John Day Dam, 1999 , 2000 .

[17]  Glenn F. Cada,et al.  DOE Hydropower Program Annual Report for FY 2004 , 2005 .

[18]  T. Engrg,et al.  Army Corps of Engineers , 2020, Federal Regulatory Guide.

[19]  C. Coutant.  Turbulent Attraction Flows for Guiding Juvenile Salmonids at Dams , 2001 .

[20]  John G. Williams,et al.  Survival Estimates for Downstream Migrant Yearling Juvenile Salmonids through the Snake and Columbia Rivers Hydropower System, 1966–1980 and 1993–1999 , 2001 .

[21]  Dale E. Schoeneman,et al.  Mortalities of Downstream Migrant Salmon at McNary Dam , 1961 .

[22]  Gary E. Johnson,et al.  Statistical evaluation of turbine bypass efficiency at Wells Dam on the Columbia River, Washington , 1996 .

[23]  John G. Williams,et al.  Survival of Juvenile Salmonids Passing through Bypass Systems, Turbines, and Spillways with and without Flow Deflectors at Snake River Dams , 2001 .

[24]  Thomas L. Acker,et al.  DOE Hydropower Program Biennial Report for FY 2005-2006 , 2006 .