Simulation of soil types in Teramo province (Central Italy) with terrain parameters and remote sensing data

Abstract Soil surveys are an essential source of information for land management although a limited budget often reduces the amount of data available. Even if the dataset is limited, geostatistics can provide a valid estimation tool through a weighted moving average interpolation (kriging). Often, however, the spatial variability of soil properties appears smoothed and short range variability is underestimated by this kind of interpolation technique. A more realistic distribution of a given variable on the territory can be obtained through models based on stochastic simulation. The study area was located in Abruzzo region, Central Italy, in the Soil Region 61.3 as defined by the European Soil Bureau, and includes an economically relevant viticulture district (Controguerra “DOCG area of Colline Teramane”). Relationships between soil type distribution and terrain attributes – slope, incoming solar radiation, NDVI, TWI, etc. – were established, and the most significant were used in a multinomial logistic regression to generate simulated maps. These maps, derived from a set of measured point data, auxiliary information from a Digital Terrain Model and Landsat images, were compared with the soil subsystem map 1:250,000, realized by ARSSA. The comparison indicated that the simulated distribution of the soil classes is consistent with the pedological map and fits better with the local morphology.

[1]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[2]  R. Reese Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists , 2001 .

[3]  Anne Gobin,et al.  Logistic Modeling to Spatially Predict the Probability of Soil Drainage Classes , 2002 .

[4]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[5]  Donald G. Bullock,et al.  Quantitative Mapping of Soil Drainage Classes Using Topographical Data and Soil Electrical Conductivity , 2002 .

[6]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[7]  B. Everitt,et al.  Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. , 1969 .

[8]  A. Dobermann,et al.  VARIATION IN THE PRECISION OF SOIL ORGANIC CARBON MAPS DUE TO DIFFERENT LABORATORY AND SPATIAL PREDICTION METHODS , 2006 .

[9]  Robin T. Clarke,et al.  Digital soil mapping using multiple logistic regression on terrain parameters in southern Brazil , 2006 .

[10]  R. Congalton,et al.  Accuracy assessment: a user's perspective , 1986 .

[11]  John C. Davis,et al.  Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA , 2003 .

[12]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  On digital soil mapping , 2003 .

[13]  Paul M. Mather,et al.  Computer Processing of Remotely-Sensed Images: An Introduction , 1988 .

[14]  J. Colwell Vegetation canopy reflectance , 1974 .

[15]  Michael Friendly,et al.  Visualizing Categorical Data , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[16]  Yanjun Shen,et al.  Development of topsoil grain size index for monitoring desertification in arid land using remote sensing , 2006 .

[17]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Geostatistics and remote sensing , 1998 .

[18]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[19]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , 2000, Technometrics.

[20]  Stewart Thompson,et al.  Modelling soil series data to facilitate targeted habitat restoration: a polytomous logistic regression approach. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[21]  Tomislav Hengl,et al.  A practical guide to geostatistical mapping of environmental variables , 2007 .

[22]  R. Webster,et al.  Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties: I The semi‐variogram and punctual kriging , 1980, European Journal of Soil Science.

[23]  P. Goovaerts Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives , 1999 .