Evidence for a phase transition in the early development of prehension.

A longitudinal study was conducted to examine the hypothesis that the development of prehension during the first 5 months of life is characterized by the presence of a discontinuous phase transition. Ten infants were observed weekly from 8 to 24 weeks of age. Video recordings were made of movements toward an attractive object which were classified according to two behavioral categories: reaching without grasping and reaching with grasping. The time evolution of the relative incidence of these behavioral categories was analyzed statistically. Evidence was found for a sudden jump from a (developmental) state in which reaching without grasping is predominant to a state in which reaching with grasping is predominant. Evidence was also found for bimodality, inaccessibility, and anomalous variance. In combination, these findings support the hypothesis that the investigated behavioral change constitutes a discontinuous phase transition. The behavioral change in question occurred at the moment in developmental time at which the attractor strength of reaching for objects as such relative to that of other behavioral activities appeared to be increased.

[1]  G J Savelsbergh,et al.  A developmental transition in prehension modeled as a cusp catastrophe. , 1998, Developmental psychobiology.

[2]  L. Cobb.  Parameter estimation for the cusp catastrophe model , 1981 .

[3]  René Thom,et al.  Structural stability and morphogenesis , 1977, Pattern Recognit..

[4]  H. Kuypers,et al.  Role of occipito-frontal cortico-cortical connections in visual guidance of relatively independent hand and finger movements in rhesus monkeys. , 1974, Brain research.

[5]  H.L.J. van der Maas.  Catastrophe analysis of stagewise cognitive development: Model, method and applications , 1993 .

[6]  M. McGraw,et al.  The Neuromuscular Maturation of the Human Infant , 1945 .

[7]  G J Savelsbergh,et al.  The effect of body orientation to gravity on early infant reaching. , 1994, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[8]  H. Thomas.  A binomial mixture model for classification performance: A commentary on Waxman, Chambers, Yntema, and Gelman (1989) , 1989 .

[9]  C. Hofsten,et al.  Observations on the development of reaching for moving objects. , 1979, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[10]  C. Hofsten.  Prospective Control: A Basic Aspect of Action Development , 1993 .

[11]  P. N. Kugler.  A Morphological Perspective on the Origin and Evolution of Movement Patterns , 1986 .

[12]  B. Everitt,et al.  Finite Mixture Distributions , 1981 .

[13]  S. Zacks,et al.  Applications of Catastrophe Theory for Statistical Modeling in the Biosciences , 1985 .

[14]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. , 1990 .

[15]  R. H. Wimmers,et al.  Phase transitions in rhythmic tracking movements: A case of unilateral coupling , 1992 .

[16]  Pier-Giorgio Zanone,et al.  Chapter 5 Concepts and Methods for A Dynamical Approach to Behavioral Coordination and Change , 1993 .

[17]  David A. Rosenbaum,et al.  Reaching and Grasping , 1990 .

[18]  Loren Cobb,et al.  Stochastic catastrophe models and multimodal distributions , 1978 .

[19]  H. Kuypers,et al.  Intrahemispheric cortical connexions and visual guidance of hand and finger movements in the rhusus monkey. , 1975, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  J. Kelso,et al.  Evolution of behavioral attractors with learning: nonequilibrium phase transitions. , 1992 .

[22]  L. Cobb.  Estimation Theory for the Cusp Catastrophe Model , 1980 .

[23]  M. Jeannerod.  The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[24]  P. Beek,et al.  Learning the cascade juggle: a dynamical systems analysis. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[25]  A. Opstal.  Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior , 1995 .

[26]  Robert Gilmore,et al.  Catastrophe Theory for Scientists and Engineers , 1981 .

[27]  M. Jeannerod.  The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[28]  H.L.J. van der Maas,et al.  Stagewise cognitive development: an application of catastrophe theory. , 1992, Psychological review.

[29]  E Thelen,et al.  Developmental origins of motor coordination: leg movements in human infants. , 1985, Developmental psychobiology.

[30]  H. Kuypers,et al.  Cerebral control of contralateral and ipsilateral arm, hand and finger movements in the split-brain rhesus monkey. , 1973, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  P. V. Geert,et al.  Dynamic systems of development: Change between complexity and chaos , 1994 .

[33]  H. Whiting,et al.  Motor development in children : aspects of coordination and control , 1986 .

[34]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[35]  K. Newell,et al.  Body scale and the development of prehension. , 1989, Developmental psychobiology.

[36]  C. Hofsten.  The Emergence of Manual Skills , 1986 .

[37]  E. Thelen,et al.  The transition to reaching: mapping intention and intrinsic dynamics. , 1993, Child development.