Fixation of Acetabular Cups without Cement in Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Comparison of Three Different Implant Surfaces at a Minimum Duration of Follow-up of Five Years*

We evaluated 377 patients (428 hips) who had been managed, by a total of fourteen surgeons at twelve clinical sites in the United States and Europe, with a porous-coated press-fit acetabular cup, a hydroxyapatite-coated threaded screw-in cup, or one of two similar designs of hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups between April 1987 and November 1992. The same type of hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem was inserted without cement in all patients. After a minimum duration of follow-up of five years (mean, 7.9 years; range, 5.3 to 9.1 years), one (1 per cent) of the 131 hydroxyapatite-coated threaded cups, two (2 per cent) of the 109 porous-coated press-fit cups, and twenty-one (11 per cent) of the 188 hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups had been revised because of aseptic loosening. A common radiographic sign of impending failure of the hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups was radiolucency at the interface between the implant and the subchondral bone beneath it. This radiolucency usually was seen initially more than two years after implantation. Radiographic evaluation of the 383 acetabular implants that were in situ at the time of the most recent follow-up showed that 123 (99 per cent) of the 124 hydroxyapatite-coated threaded cups, 101 (98 per cent) of the 103 porous-coated cups, and 139 (89 per cent) of the 156 hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups were stable with osseous ingrowth (as indicated by the absence of radiolucency at the interface and the absence of migration within the acetabulum). The probability of revision due to aseptic loosening was significantly greater for the hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups than it was for the hydroxyapatite-coated threaded cups or the porous-coated press-fit cups (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). Within the group of patients who had a hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cup, the probability of revision due to aseptic loosening was significantly greater in association with a young age (p = 0.003), female gender (p = 0.02), the use of a femoral head with a diameter of thirty-two millimeters (p = 0.018), and the use of a thin polyethylene liner (p < 0.001). We found that the hydroxyapatite-coated threaded cups and the porous-coated press-fit cups continued to perform well more than five years after the operation. The hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups that were revised probably failed because the fixation interface beneath the cup could not sustain the tensile stresses that were imposed between the cup and the bone by the activity of the patient. Our data suggest that, in the specific biomechanical environment of the acetabulum, physical interlocking between the cup and the supporting bone beneath it may be a prerequisite for long-term stability.

[1]  C. Engh,et al.  Comparison of porous-threaded and smooth-threaded acetabular components of identical design. Two- to four-year results. , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  E. Morscher,et al.  Development and first experience with an uncemented press-fit cup. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  W. Harris,et al.  The Harris-Galante porous acetabular component press-fit without screw fixation. Five-year radiographic analysis of primary cases. , 1994, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  J O Galante,et al.  Primary total hip reconstruction with a titanium fiber-coated prosthesis inserted without cement. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  J. Charnley,et al.  The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  A. McBeath,et al.  Hip replacement with a threaded acetabular cup. A follow-up study. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  S. C. Gallanaugh Hydroxyapatite Coated Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.: Edited by J. A. Epinette and R. G. T. Geesink. Pp 394. Paris Expansion Scientifique Française, 1995. ISBN: 2-7046-1470-9. FF.805.00. , 1996 .

[8]  D. J. Rapperport,et al.  Contact finite element stress analysis of porous ingrowth acetabular cup implantation, ingrowth, and loosening , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  C. Engh,et al.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  J. Callaghan,et al.  The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. Results after five to seven years in a prospective study. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  W. Capello,et al.  Failure of the Mecron screw-in ring. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  T. Bauer,et al.  Uncemented acetabular components. Histologic analysis of retrieved hydroxyapatite-coated and porous implants. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  F. Kummer,et al.  Stability of press-fit acetabular cups. , 1992, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  F.R.S. F.R.C.S. F.A.C.S Professor Sir John Charnley C.B.E. Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip , 1979, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[15]  J. Black,et al.  Metal on Metal Bearings: A Practical Alternative to Metal on Polyethylene Total Joints? , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  A H Burstein,et al.  Studies of the mechanism by which the mechanical failure of polymethylmethacrylate leads to bone resorption. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  J. Cartillier The contribution of hydroxyapatite: study of implants of identical geometry with and without hydroxyapatite coating , 1995 .

[18]  E. Morscher,et al.  Current status of acetabular fixation in primary total hip arthroplasty. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  W. Maloney,et al.  The progression of femoral cortical osteolysis in association with total hip arthroplasty without cement. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  W H Harris,et al.  The effect of improved cementing techniques on component loosening in total hip replacement. An 11-year radiographic review. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  M. Ritter,et al.  Correlation of prosthetic femoral head size and/or design with longevity of total hip arthroplasty. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  J. Charnley,et al.  Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. , 1976, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  R. Geesink,et al.  Six-year results of hydroxyapatite-coated total hip replacement. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[24]  W. Capello,et al.  Remodeling of Bone around Hydroxyapatite-Coated Femoral Stems* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  W. Harris,et al.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. , 1969, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  W. Capello,et al.  Hydroxyapatite-Coated Total Hip Femoral Components in Patients Less Than Fifty Years Old. Clinical and Radiographic Results after Five to Eight Years of Follow-up* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[27]  Y. Kim,et al.  Uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip replacement. Results at six years in a consecutive series. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[28]  J. Epinette,et al.  The arc 2f cup: biomechanics and interface: systematic study of HA-coated vs. porous textured components , 1995 .

[29]  J. Moreland,et al.  Acetabular reconstruction with a threaded prosthesis for failed total hip arthroplasty. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[30]  W H Harris,et al.  The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. Radiographic analysis of eighty-three primary hip replacements at a minimum of five years. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  W. Harris,et al.  Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty. Polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[32]  J. Kabo,et al.  Comparison of in vivo cementless acetabular fixation. , 1988, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[33]  G. Engh,et al.  Comparative experience with intramedullary and extramedullary alignment in total knee arthroplasty. , 1990, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[34]  M Jasty,et al.  Histological and radiographic assessment of well functioning porous-coated acetabular components. A human postmortem retrieval study. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[35]  C. Engh,et al.  Results of cementless revision for failed cemented total hip arthroplasty. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[36]  W H Harris,et al.  The synovial-like membrane at the bone-cement interface in loose total hip replacements and its proposed role in bone lysis. , 1983, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[37]  C. Engh,et al.  Patterns of osteolysis around total hip components inserted with and without cement. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[38]  T D Brown,et al.  Concerns and improvements with cementless metal-backed acetabular components. , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[39]  W. Harris Hybrid total hip arhtroplasty , 1989 .

[40]  D. Smith,et al.  Threaded cup acetabuloplasty. Early clinical experience. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[41]  John Charnley,et al.  Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip: Theory and Practice , 1978 .

[42]  W. Maloney,et al.  Hybrid total hip arthroplasty. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.