The Effect of Climatological Variables on Future UAS-Based Atmospheric Profiling in the Lower Atmosphere

Vertical profiles of wind, temperature, and moisture are essential to capture the kinematic and thermodynamic structure of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL). Our goal is to use weather observing unmanned aircraft systems (WxUAS) to perform the vertical profiles by taking measurements while ascending through the ABL and subsequently descending to the Earth’s surface. Before establishing routine profiles using a network of WxUAS stations, the climatologies of the flight locations must be studied. This was done using data from the North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) model. To begin, NARR data accuracy was verified against radiosondes. While the results showed variability in individual profiles, the detailed statistical analyses of the aggregated data suggested that the NARR model is a viable option for the study. Based on these findings, we used NARR data to determine fractions of successful hypothetical flights of vertical profiles across the state of Oklahoma given thresholds of visibility, cloud base level (CBL) height, and wind speed. CBL height is an important parameter because the WxUAS must stay below clouds for the flight restrictions being considered. For the purpose of this study, a hypothetical WxUAS flight is considered successful if the vehicle is able to reach an altitude corresponding to a pressure level of 600 hPa. Our analysis indicated the CBL height parameter hindered the fractions of successful hypothetical flights the most and the wind speed tolerance limited the fractions of successful hypothetical flights most strongly in the winter months. Northwest Oklahoma had the highest fractions of successful hypothetical flights, and the southeastern corner performs the worst in every season except spring, when the northeastern corner performed the worst. Future work will study the potential effect of topology and additional variables, such as amount of rainfall and temperature, on fractions of successful hypothetical flights by region of the state.

[1]  Phillip B. Chilson,et al.  Moving towards a Network of Autonomous UAS Atmospheric Profiling Stations for Observations in the Earth’s Lower Atmosphere: The 3D Mesonet Concept , 2019, Sensors.

[2]  Joel Nothman,et al.  SciPy 1.0-Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , 2019, ArXiv.

[3]  Jidong Gao,et al.  Sensitivity of Convective Initiation Prediction to Near-Surface Moisture When Assimilating Radar Refractivity: Impact Tests Using OSSEs , 2013 .

[4]  Christopher A. Fiebrich,et al.  Mesonets: Mesoscale Weather and Climate Observations for the United States , 2017 .

[5]  David D. Parrish,et al.  NORTH AMERICAN REGIONAL REANALYSIS , 2006 .

[6]  Phillip B. Chilson,et al.  The CopterSonde: an insight into the development of a smart unmanned aircraft system for atmospheric boundary layer research , 2020, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[7]  Michael R. Raupach,et al.  The influence of topography on meteorogical variables and surface-atmosphere interactions , 1997 .

[8]  Sutherland,et al.  Statewide Monitoring of the Mesoscale Environment: A Technical Update on the Oklahoma Mesonet , 2007 .

[9]  David D. Flagg,et al.  On the Impact of Unmanned Aerial System Observations on Numerical Weather Prediction in the Coastal Zone , 2017 .

[10]  J. Winkler,et al.  Low-Level Jets in the North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR): A Comparison with Rawinsonde Observations , 2014 .

[11]  David M. Schultz,et al.  The Use of Moisture Flux Convergence in Forecasting Convective Initiation: Historical and Operational Perspectives , 2005 .

[12]  Rachel T. Pinker,et al.  Evaluation of cloud base height in the North American Regional Reanalysis using ceilometer observations , 2019, International Journal of Climatology.

[13]  Steven E. Koch,et al.  MULTIFUNCTIONAL MESOSCALE OBSERVING NETWORKS , 2005 .

[14]  D. Waldman,et al.  U.S. Economic Sensitivity to Weather Variability , 2011 .