Assessing hurricane effects. Part 1. Sensitivity analysis

Abstract The Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology (FCHLPM) performs an annual review of computer models that have been submitted by vendors for use in insurance rate filling in Florida. As part of the review process and to comply with the Sunshine Law, the FCHLPM employs a Professional Team to perform onsite (confidential) audits of these models. Members of the Professional Team represent the fields of actuarial science, computer science, meteorology, statistics and wind and structural engineering. The audit includes an assessment of modeler's compliance to a set of standards and modules established by the FCHLPM. One part of these standards requires the conduct of uncertainty and sensitivity analyses to the proprietary model. At the completion of the audit, the professional team provides a written report to the FCHLPM, who ultimately judges compliance by a vendor to the standards. To influence future such analyses, the Professional Team conducted a demonstration uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for the FCHLPM using a Rankine-vortex hurricane wind field model and surrogate damage function. This is the first of a two-part article presenting the results of those analyses. Part 1 presents sensitivity analysis results for wind speed and loss cost, while Part 2 presents the corresponding uncertainty analysis results.

[1]  D. Hamby.  A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models , 1994, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[2]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Latin Hypercube Sampling and the Propagation of Uncertainty in Analyses of Complex Systems , 2002 .

[3]  Michael D. McKay,et al.  Nonparametric variance-based methods of assessing uncertainty importance , 1997 .

[4]  Richard A. Anthes,et al.  Tropical Cyclones: Their Evolution, Structure and Effects , 1982 .

[5]  Terry Andres,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of model output: an investigation of new techniques , 1993 .

[6]  R. Iman,et al.  A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables , 1982 .

[7]  R. Iman,et al.  Rank correlation plots for use with correlated input variables , 1982 .

[8]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal , 1993 .

[9]  Ronald L. Iman,et al.  Assessing hurricane effects. Part 2. Uncertainty analysis , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Hadi Dowlatabadi,et al.  Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of Complex Models of Disease Transmission: an HIV Model, as an Example , 1994 .

[11]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models , 1993 .

[12]  G. M. Barnes,et al.  Marine Flooding on the Coast of Kaua'i during Hurricane Iniki: Hindcasting Inundation Components and Delineating Washover , 1995 .

[13]  J. D. Morrison,et al.  Evaluating prediction uncertainty in simulation models , 1999 .

[14]  A. Saltelli,et al.  A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output , 1999 .

[15]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .