Seismic behavior of SMA–FRP reinforced concrete frames under sequential seismic hazard

Abstract Accumulation of plastic deformation under excessive loads, is one of the most critical drawbacks in steel reinforced concrete structures. Permanent plastic deformation of steel rebars is among the main reasons for the disruption of the functionality of RC structures after major seismic events. It can also pose life threatening risks in case of strong aftershock occurrence. In an attempt to address the problem of excessive permanent deformations and their impact on the post-earthquake functionality of concrete moment resisting frame (MRF) structures, this paper studies analytically a new type of reinforcing bars made of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) with embedded superelastic shape memory alloy (SMA) fibers. SMA–FRP reinforcement is characterized with both ductility and pseudo-elasticity which are two important characteristics that are sough in this study to enhance the ability of RC moment frames to withstand strong sequential ground motions (i.e. main shock followed by one or more aftershocks). In this study, experimentally validated SMA–FRP material models are used in structural level models to assess the performance of RC frame structures under seismic loading. Three-story, one-bay prototype RC MRFs, reinforced with steel and SMA–FRP composite reinforcements are first designed using performance based criteria and then subjected to incremental dynamic analysis under sequential ground motions. Comparison is drawn between steel and SMA–FRP reinforced frames based on accumulation of damage and residual drifts. Numerical results show superior performance of SMA–FRP composite reinforced MRF in terms of dissipation of energy and accumulation of lower residual drifts. Increased demands from the effects of aftershock causes accumulation of residual drifts in steel reinforced frames which is mitigated in SMA–FRP reinforced frame through re-centering capability.

[1]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[2]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Applied Incremental Dynamic Analysis , 2004 .

[3]  M. Saiid Saiidi,et al.  Pilot Study of Behavior of Concrete Beams Reinforced with Shape Memory Alloys , 2007 .

[4]  A. Elnashai,et al.  Fundamentals of earthquake engineering , 2008 .

[5]  George D. Hatzigeorgiou,et al.  Nonlinear behaviour of RC frames under repeated strong ground motions , 2010 .

[6]  J. Ruiz-García,et al.  EVALUATION OF EXISTING MEXICAN HIGHWAY BRIDGES UNDER MAINSHOCK-AFTERSHOCK SEISMIC SEQUENCES , 2008 .

[7]  B. Andrawes,et al.  Superelastic SMA–FRP composite reinforcement for concrete structures , 2010 .

[8]  Jorge Ruiz-García,et al.  Evaluation of drift demands in existing steel frames under as-recorded far-field and near-fault mainshock–aftershock seismic sequences , 2011 .

[9]  A. Arias A measure of earthquake intensity , 1970 .

[10]  Qiang Xue,et al.  Preliminary detailing for displacement-based seismic design of buildings , 2006 .

[11]  Moncef L. Nehdi,et al.  Development of corrosion-free concrete beam–column joint with adequate seismic energy dissipation , 2010 .

[12]  A. Zafar,et al.  Fabrication and Cyclic Behavior of Highly Ductile Superelastic Shape Memory Composites , 2014 .

[13]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  The seismic performance of RC buildings in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake , 2011 .

[14]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Experimental results of a NiTi shape memory alloy (SMA)-based recentering beam-column connection , 2011 .

[15]  M. Menegotto Method of Analysis for Cyclically Loaded R. C. Plane Frames Including Changes in Geometry and Non-Elastic Behavior of Elements under Combined Normal Force and Bending , 1973 .

[16]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[17]  Quanwang Li,et al.  Performance evaluation and damage assessment of steel frame buildings under main shock–aftershock earthquake sequences , 2007 .

[18]  Hiroyuki Nakahara,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDY FOR DEVELOPING SELF-CENTERING RC STRUCTURAL FRAMES WITH COLUMN-YIELDING MECHANISM , 2008 .

[19]  A. Zafar,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis of concrete moment resisting frames reinforced with shape memory composite bars , 2012 .

[20]  H. Naito,et al.  Analytical Study on Training Effect of Pseudoelastic Transformation of Shape Memory Alloys in Cyclic Loading , 2001 .

[21]  Gang Wu,et al.  Post-yield stiffnesses and residual deformations of RC bridge columns reinforced with ordinary rebars and steel fiber composite bars , 2010 .