Failure of the Ingard-Myers boundary condition for a lined duct: an experimental investigation.

This paper deals with experimental investigation of the lined wall boundary condition in flow duct applications such as aircraft engine systems or automobile mufflers. A first experiment, based on a microphone array located in the liner test section, is carried out in order to extract the axial wavenumbers with the help of an "high-accurate" singular value decomposition Prony-like algorithm. The experimental axial wavenumbers are then used to provide the lined wall impedance for both downstream and upstream acoustic propagation by means of a straightforward impedance education method involving the classical Ingard-Myers boundary condition. The results show that the Ingard-Myers boundary condition fails to predict with accuracy the acoustic behavior in a lined duct with flow. An effective lined wall impedance, valid whatever the direction of acoustic propagation, can be suitably found from experimental axial wavenumbers and a modified version of the Ingard-Myers condition with the form inspired from a previous theoretical study [Aurégan et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 59-64 (2001)]. In a second experiment, the scattering matrix of the liner test section is measured and is then compared to the predicted scattering matrix using the multimodal approach and the lined wall impedances previously deduced. A large discrepancy is observed between the measured and the predicted scattering coefficients that confirms the poor accuracy provided from the Ingard-Myers boundary condition widely used in lined duct applications.

[1]  Walter Eversman,et al.  Impedance Eduction with an Extended Search Procedure , 2009 .

[2]  Vincent Pagneux,et al.  Measurement of Liner Impedance with Flow by an Inverse Method , 2004 .

[3]  Vincent Pagneux,et al.  Modelling of sound propagation in a non-uniform lined duct using a Multi-Modal Propagation Method , 2006 .

[4]  Hans Bodén,et al.  An inverse analytical method for extracting liner impedance from pressure measurements , 2004 .

[5]  Geoffrey Ye Li,et al.  A parameter estimation scheme for damped sinusoidal signals based on low-rank Hankel approximation , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[6]  Walter Eversman,et al.  Theoretical models for duct acoustic propagation and radiation , 1991 .

[7]  R. Kumaresan,et al.  Estimating the parameters of exponentially damped sinusoids and pole-zero modeling in noise , 1982 .

[8]  Sw Sjoerd Rienstra,et al.  Sound propagation in slowly varying lined flow ducts of arbitrary cross-section , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  Xiaofeng Sun,et al.  A straightforward method for wall impedance eduction in a flow duct. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  R. J. Astley,et al.  A computational mode-matching approach for sound propagation in three-dimensional ducts with flow , 2008 .

[11]  Ali H. Nayfeh,et al.  Acoustics of Aircraft Engine-Duct Systems , 1975 .

[12]  Vincent Pagneux,et al.  Influence of grazing flow and dissipation effects on the acoustic boundary conditions at a lined wall , 2001 .

[13]  Ej Brambley,et al.  Viscous boundary layer effects on the Myers impedance boundary condition , 2009 .

[14]  Willie R. Watson,et al.  Validation of an Impedance Eduction Method in Flow , 1999 .

[16]  Walter Eversman,et al.  Impedance Eduction with an Extended Search Procedure , 2009 .

[17]  Uno Ingard,et al.  Influence of Fluid Motion Past a Plane Boundary on Sound Reflection, Absorption, and Transmission , 1959 .

[18]  M. K. Myers,et al.  On the acoustic boundary condition in the presence of flow , 1980 .