Effect of detraining on bone and muscle tissue in subjects with chronic spinal cord injury after a period of electrically-stimulated cycling: a small cohort study.

OBJECTIVE To investigate adaptive changes in bone and muscle parameters in the paralysed limbs after detraining or reduced functional electrical stimulation (FES) induced cycling following high-volume FES-cycling in chronic spinal cord injury. SUBJECTS Five subjects with motor-sensory complete spinal cord injury (age 38.6 years, lesion duration 11.4 years) were included. Four subjects stopped FES-cycling completely after the training phase whereas one continued reduced FES-cycling (2-3 times/week, for 30 min). METHODS Bone and muscle parameters were assessed in the legs using peripheral quantitative computed tomography at 6 and 12 months after cessation of high-volume FES-cycling. RESULTS Gains achieved in the distal femur by high-volume FES-cycling were partly maintained at one year of detraining: 73.0% in trabecular bone mineral density, 63.8% in total bone mineral density, 59.4% in bone mineral content and 22.1% in muscle cross-sectional area in the thigh. The subject who continued reduced FES-cycling maintained 96.2% and 95.0% of the previous gain in total and trabecular bone mineral density, and 98.5% in muscle cross-sectional area. CONCLUSION Bone and muscle benefits achieved by one year of high-volume FES-cycling are partly preserved after 12 months of detraining, whereas reduced cycling maintains bone and muscle mass gained. This suggests that high-volume FES-cycling has clinical relevance for at least one year after detraining.

[1]  F. Biering-Sørensen,et al.  Increased Bone Mineral Density after Prolonged Electrically Induced Cycle Training of Paralyzed Limbs in Spinal Cord Injured Man , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.

[2]  W. Donovan,et al.  The International Standards Booklet for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury , 1994, Paraplegia.

[3]  R. Waters,et al.  International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[4]  A Frotzler,et al.  Relationship between the duration of paralysis and bone structure: a pQCT study of spinal cord injured individuals. , 2004, Bone.

[5]  P. London Injury , 1969, Definitions.

[6]  Jachen Denoth,et al.  Fracture threshold in the femur and tibia of people with spinal cord injury as determined by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  H. Frost Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: A proposal , 1987, The Anatomical record.

[8]  F. Biering-Sørensen,et al.  Longitudinal study of bone mineral content in the lumbar spine, the forearm and the lower extremities after spinal cord injury , 1990, European journal of clinical investigation.

[9]  Kenneth J Hunt,et al.  High-volume FES-cycling partially reverses bone loss in people with chronic spinal cord injury. , 2008, Bone.

[10]  Shih-Ching Chen,et al.  Increases in bone mineral density after functional electrical stimulation cycling exercises in spinal cord injured patients , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[11]  Gary A. Dudley,et al.  Influence of complete spinal cord injury on skeletal muscle cross-sectional area within the first 6 months of injury , 1999, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[12]  P. Vestergaard,et al.  Fracture rates and risk factors for fractures in patients with spinal cord injury , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[13]  P. Bergmann,et al.  Longitudinal study of the bone mineral content and of soft tissue composition after spinal cord section , 1995, Paraplegia.