Who Uses Smart City Services and What to Make of It: Toward Interdisciplinary Smart Cities Research

As research on smart cities garners increased attention and its status consolidates as one of the fanciest areas of research today, this paper makes a case for a cautious rethink of the very rationale and relevance of the debate. To this end, this paper looks at the smart cities debate from the perspectives of, on the one hand, citizens’ awareness of applications and solutions that are considered ‘smart’ and, on the other hand, their ability to use these applications and solutions. Drawing from a detailed analysis of the outcomes of a pilot international study, this paper showcases that even the most educated users of smart city services, i.e., those arguably most aware of and equipped with skills to use these services effectively, express very serious concerns regarding the utility, safety, accessibility and efficiency of those services. This suggests that more pragmatism needs to be included in smart cities research if its findings are to remain useful and relevant for all stakeholders involved. The discussion in this paper contributes to the smart cities debate in three ways. First, it adds empirical support to the thesis of ‘normative bias’ of smart cities research. Second, it suggests ways of bypassing it, thereby opening a debate on the preconditions of sustainable interdisciplinary smart cities research. Third, it points to new avenues of research.

[1]  T. Ishida,et al.  Digital cities : technologies, experiences, and future perspectives , 2000 .

[2]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  Visual exploration of large data sets , 2001, Commun. ACM.

[3]  A. Warleigh-Lack Greening the European Union for legitimacy? A cautionary reading of Europe 2020 , 2010 .

[4]  F. Canters,et al.  Mapping form and function in urban areas: An approach based on urban metrics and continuous impervious surface data , 2011 .

[5]  Miltiadis D. Lytras,et al.  An emerging - Social and emerging computing enabled philosophical paradigm for collaborative learning systems: Toward high effective next generation learning systems for the knowledge society , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Mattias Höjer,et al.  Smart Sustainable Cities: Definition and Challenges , 2015, ICT Innovations for Sustainability.

[7]  Miltiadis D. Lytras,et al.  Enabling Technologies and Business Infrastructures for Next Generation Social Media: Big Data, Cloud Computing, Internet of Things and Virtual Reality , 2015, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[8]  Hui Chen,et al.  A literature survey on smart cities , 2015, Science China Information Sciences.

[9]  Miltiadis D. Lytras,et al.  Innovative Mobile Information Systems: Insights from Gulf Cooperation Countries and All Over the World , 2016, Mob. Inf. Syst..

[10]  María Graciela Badilla-Quintana,et al.  The New Pyramid of Needs for the Digital Citizen: A Transition towards Smart Human Cities , 2017 .

[11]  Simon Elias Bibri,et al.  On the Social Shaping Dimensions of Smart Sustainable Cities: A Study in Science, Technology, and Society , 2017 .

[12]  N. Komninos,et al.  Enhancing sustainable urban development through smart city applications , 2017 .

[13]  Patricia Ordóñez de Pablos,et al.  Disease Diagnosis in Smart Healthcare: Innovation, Technologies and Applications , 2017 .

[14]  Vijay V. Raghavan,et al.  Big Data and Data Analytics Research: From Metaphors to Value Space for Collective Wisdom in Human Decision Making and Smart Machines , 2017, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[15]  S. Bi,et al.  The influence of online information on investing decisions of reward-based crowdfunding , 2017 .

[16]  M. Lytras,et al.  Irregular migratory flows: Towards an ICTs’ enabled integrated framework for resilient urban systems , 2017 .

[17]  Miltiadis D. Lytras,et al.  Cognitive Computing Track Chairs' Welcome & Organization , 2018, WWW.

[18]  M. Lytras,et al.  Policy making for smart cities: innovation and social inclusive economic growth for sustainability , 2018, Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management.

[19]  Weiqi Wang,et al.  Distance Diffusion of Home Bias for Crowdfunding Campaigns between Categories: Insights from Data Analytics , 2018 .

[20]  M. Lytras,et al.  Smart Cities in Taiwan: A Perspective on Big Data Applications , 2018 .

[21]  M. Lytras,et al.  Rescaling and refocusing smart cities research: from mega cities to smart villages , 2018, Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management.