A new digital optic disc stereo camera: intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of optic disc measurements

AIMS To investigate the intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of optic disc measurement using a new digital optic disc stereo camera. METHODS 112 consecutive new patients presenting to a glaucoma service had dilated optic disc photography performed using a new digital stereo camera (Discam, Marcher Enterprises Ltd, Hereford). The images were analysed by two masked observers using a stereo viewer and computer simulated stereopsis. Vertical and horizontal cup:disc ratios (CDR), cup area:disc area, and cup circumference:disc circumference were computed. Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability analyses were performed. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and 95% tolerance for change (TC) were computed. RESULTS 220 optic discs were photographed, of which 196 were suitable for analysis (10 were of poor image quality and 14 had anomalous discs). Mean age of patients was 65 years, 60 were male and 48 female. For intraobserver measurements of: horizontal CDR, ICC = 0.94, TC = 0.11 (15% of range); vertical CDR, ICC = 0.92, TC = 0.14 (16% of range); cup area:disc area, ICC = 0.95, TC = 0.10 (13% of range), and cup circumference:disc circumference, ICC = 0.95, TC = 0.09 (14% of range). For interobserver measurements of: horizontal CDR, ICC = 0.89, TC = 0.14 (19% of range); vertical CDR, ICC = 0.90, TC = 0.14 (16% of range); cup area:disc area, ICC = 0.92, TC = 0.13 (16% of range), and cup circumference:disc circumference, ICC = 0.90, TC = 0.12 (17% of range). Systematic bias between observers was within acceptable limits. CONCLUSIONS Digital stereo disc photography and analysis provide repeatable measures of optic disc variables. The results compare favourably with ophthalmoscopic and stereophotographic methods of assessment of the optic disc.

[1]  Relative Optic Cup Depth Assessments Using Three Stereo Photograph Viewing Methods , 1996, Journal of glaucoma.

[2]  Evaluation of Optic Disc Measurements with the Glaucoma‐Scope , 1996, Journal of glaucoma.

[3]  R. Klein,et al.  Quantitation of optic disc cupping. , 1985, Ophthalmology.

[4]  A. Sommer,et al.  Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in measurement of optic disc characteristics. , 1988, Ophthalmology.

[5]  Standardizing Diagnostic Procedures , 1975 .

[6]  R Varma,et al.  Agreement among optometrists, ophthalmologists, and residents in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[7]  R. Klein,et al.  Optic disc cupping as clinically estimated from photographs. , 1987, Ophthalmology.

[8]  C. Johnson,et al.  Comparison of photographic techniques and films used in stereophotogrammetry of the optic disk. , 1979, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  A. Sommer,et al.  Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  J. Jonas,et al.  Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head. , 1999, Survey of ophthalmology.

[11]  I. Scott,et al.  Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. , 1992, Ophthalmology.

[12]  R N Weinreb,et al.  Agreement between clinicians and a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope in estimating cup/disk ratios. , 1995, American journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  D G Falconer,et al.  Comparative reproducibility of the digital photogrammetric procedure utilizing three methods of stereophotography. , 1977, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  J Caprioli,et al.  Progression of disc and field damage in early glaucoma. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  J. T. Schwartz Methodologic differences and measurement of cup-disc ratio: an epidemiologic assessment. , 1976, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  J Caprioli,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the optic nerve in glaucoma. , 1994, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[17]  W. Green,et al.  Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. , 1982, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  T. Peters,et al.  The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study: reliability of community optometric and hospital eye service test measures , 1999, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  A Sommer,et al.  Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in the Detection of Glaucomatous Progression of the Optic Disc , 1996, Journal of glaucoma.

[20]  A E Maumenee,et al.  Optic disc parameters and onset of glaucomatous field loss. I. Methods and progressive changes in disc morphology. , 1979, Archives of ophthalmology.

[21]  D. R. Anderson,et al.  The mode of progressive disc cupping in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. , 1980, Archives of ophthalmology.

[22]  P. Lichter Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc. , 1976, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[23]  R Varma,et al.  Agreement between clinicians and an image analyzer in estimating cup-to-disc ratios. , 1989, Archives of ophthalmology.