Crosstalk between array elements is an important and intensively discussed topic for CMUTs. For operation in fluids crosstalk effects significantly influence the dynamic range at pulse-echo mode, directivity pattern and frequency response and are highly undesired for medical application. On the other hand, crosstalk effects between the membranes and the surrounding fluid are used for other CMUT applications like pumping and mixing in micro fluidic channels. So far, coupling between the membranes and the surrounding fluid was mostly described as Stonely or Scholte waves at the CMUT surface. This paper presents an analytical description of this crosstalk effect between CMUT membranes. The basic idea is that the elastic membranes act as a complex load onto the fluid. Waves at such an interface are comparable to gravitational waves at a free water surface. Considering a homogeneously stiff and mass loaded interface, the speed of sound of an evanescent fluid wave at this interface will be described analytically with a simple formula for a fluid half space bounded by a complex acoustical impedance. The approach was validated with FEM simulations. Investigations with respect to the influence of discretisation and size of typical membranes are discussed as well as the influence of membrane stiffness, membrane mass and inactive area between membranes onto the speed of sound and the intensity distribution of this surface wave. The wave is highly dispersive, its speed of sound increases with increasing stiffness and with decreasing frequency. Both effects are monotonic but nonlinear for frequencies above the membrane resonance. Near membrane resonance the speed of sound approaches zero. FEM simulations of typical CMUT membranes show that these surface waves have a significant influence onto the array behavior and can be well described by the presented analytical approach.
[1]
Michael D. Serotta,et al.
Acoustics of layered media II
,
1990
.
[2]
G. G. Stokes.
"J."
,
1890,
The New Yale Book of Quotations.
[3]
K. Niederer,et al.
Micromachined ultrasound transducers with improved coupling factors from a CMOS compatible process
,
2000,
Ultrasonics.
[4]
B. Khuri-Yakub,et al.
Characterization of one-dimensional capacitive micromachined ultrasonic immersion transducer arrays
,
2001,
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.
[5]
B. Khuri-Yakub,et al.
Lamb wave devices based on capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers
,
2002,
2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings..
[6]
Reinhard Lerch,et al.
Micromachined transducer design for minimized generation of surface waves
,
1999,
1999 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. International Symposium (Cat. No.99CH37027).
[7]
A. Atalar,et al.
Analytic modeling of loss and cross-coupling in capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers
,
1998,
1998 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings (Cat. No. 98CH36102).
[8]
F. Degertekin,et al.
Interdigital capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers for microfluidic applications
,
2003,
IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics, 2003.
[9]
Aaas News,et al.
Book Reviews
,
1893,
Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.
[10]
B. Khuri-Yakub,et al.
Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers: next-generation arrays for acoustic imaging?
,
2002,
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.