Porcine field fertility with two different insemination doses and the effect of sperm morphology.

In swine artificial insemination, several dose regimens are applied, ranging from 1.5 x 10(9) to 6.0 x 10(9) spermatozoa per intra-cervical insemination dose. A lower sperm dose is more profitable for artificial insemination centres and offers a more effective use of superior boars. To evaluate fertility, 50 boars were used for a total of 10 773 homospermic first inseminations at a dose of 2 billion spermatozoa. In addition, 96 boars were used at a dose of 3 billion spermatozoa for 34 789 homospermic first inseminations. Fertility was determined by a 60-day non-return rate (NR%) of first inseminations. Litter size was registered by total number of piglets born separately in primiparous and multiparous farrowings. On average, a sow was inseminated 1.5 times. A significant decrease was observed in all three fertility parameters (NR%, litter size of both primiparous and multiparous farrowings) with a dose of 2 billion spermatozoa compared with a dose of 3 billion spermatozoa. The NR% was 75.8% and 84.0% (p < 0.001), the mean litter size of primiparous farrowings 10.1 and 10.7 (p < 0.001) and the mean litter size of multiparous farrowings 11.7 and 12.1 (p < 0.001) for 2 and 3 billion spermatozoa/dose, respectively. The proportion of normal spermatozoa in the sperm morphology analysis correlated significantly with NR% in both insemination regimens: p < 0.001, r = 0.604 and p < 0.05, r = 0.223 for 2 and 3 billion spermatozoa/dose, respectively. These results confirm that quantity can at least partly compensate for poor sperm quality. When the boars with <70% normal spermatozoa in the morphology evaluation were excluded from the data there were no correlation between the sperm morphology and NR%. However, the difference between the NR% and litter size remained statistically significant (p < 0.001) in favour for the bigger insemination dose. In conclusion, a decrease in sperm dose from 3 to 2 billion spermatozoa on commercial farms will severely decrease prolificacy at least under field conditions, where a sow is inseminated an average of 1.5 times/heat, and the semen is typically used within 3 days after collection. We recommend that under commercial circumstances the homospermic semen doses contain no <3 billion spermatozoa/dose.

[1]  G. Seidel,et al.  Fertilizing potential in vitro of semen from young beef bulls containing a high or low percentage of sperm with a proximal droplet. , 2000, Theriogenology.

[2]  R L Nebel,et al.  Relationship of seminal traits and insemination time to fertilization rate and embryo quality. , 2000, Animal reproduction science.

[3]  D P Evenson,et al.  Loss of livestock breeding efficiency due to uncompensable sperm nuclear defects. , 1999, Reproduction, fertility, and development.

[4]  G. Foxcroft,et al.  In vitro maturation and fertilization techniques for assessment of semen quality and boar fertility. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[5]  M. Wilson,et al.  Characterization of lower temperature storage limitations of fresh-extended porcine semen. , 1998, Theriogenology.

[6]  W. Johnson The significance to bull fertility of morphologically abnormal sperm. , 1997, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[7]  H. Rodríguez-Martínez,et al.  In Vitro Assessment of Viability and Fertilizing Capacity of Bull Spermatozoa , 1997 .

[8]  G. Althouse Evaluating porcine semen for artificial insemination. II. Assessment of cell membranes and viability , 1997 .

[9]  A. Ideta,et al.  Ultrasonographic Analysis of the Number of Large, Middle and Small Follicles of Japanese Black Cattle during the Estrous Cycle and Early Pregnancy , 1997 .

[10]  B. Pintado,et al.  EFFECT OF COOLED and FROZEN BOAR SEMEN ON EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT , 1996 .

[11]  S. Meding,et al.  Fertility of long-term-stored boar semen: Influence of extender (Androhep and Kiev), storage time and plasma droplets in the semen , 1994 .

[12]  B. Colenbrander,et al.  Optimizing semen production for artificial insemination in swine. , 2020, Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement.

[13]  K. Larsson,et al.  Sperm morphology and fertility in A.I. bulls. , 1991, Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe A.

[14]  R. Oko,et al.  Abnormal Morphology of Bovine Spermatozoa , 1991 .

[15]  R. Foote,et al.  Determination of the relationship between sperm morphologic classifications and fertility in stallions: 66 cases (1987-1988). , 1990, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[16]  K. Larsson,et al.  Sperm morphology and in vitro viability in diluted semen in relation to fertility of AI boars. , 1980, Nordisk veterinaermedicin.

[17]  M. Schmehl,et al.  Problems with laboratory assays. , 1980 .

[18]  P. F. Watson Use of a Giemsa stain to detect changes in acrosomes of frozen ram spermatozoa , 1975, Veterinary Record.

[19]  Von R. Winnigstedt Der Stand der Rinderbesamung in der Bundesrepublik , 1966 .