Mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy histograms of patients with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Compared with conventional T2-weighted MR imaging, diffusion tensor MR imaging provides quantitative indices with increased specificity to the most destructive aspects of multiple sclerosis. In this study, we obtained brain mean diffusivity (_D) and fractional anisotropy histograms of patients with multiple sclerosis to compare them with those of healthy volunteers and to investigate the correlation between diffusion tensor MR imaging histogram-derived measures and the level of disability and quantities derived from conventional MR imaging. METHODS Dual-echo and diffusion tensor MR images were obtained from 78 patients with relapsing-remitting, secondary progressive, or primary progressive multiple sclerosis and from 20 healthy control volunteers. After obtaining mean diffusivity (_D) and fractional anisotropy images and image coregistration, _D and fractional anisotropy histograms were created. From each histogram, the following measures were derived: the average _D and fractional anisotropy, the histogram peak heights, and the histogram peak locations. RESULTS All the _D and fractional anisotropy histogram-derived measures were different between patients and controls at a significance level of P <.001. No differences were found in any of the considered quantities among the three multiple sclerosis phenotypes. In patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, disability was correlated with histogram average_D (r = 0.4, P =.01) and peak height (r = -0.4, P =.01). In patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, disability was correlated with fractional anisotropy histogram peak position (r = -0.6, P =.01). Significant correlations were also found between T2 lesion load and various diffusion tensor MR quantities. CONCLUSION This study shows that brain _D and fractional anisotropy histograms are different for patients with multiple sclerosis compared with control volunteers. This study also shows that quantities derived from diffusion tensor MR imaging are correlated with disability in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, suggesting that they might serve as additional measures of outcome when monitoring multiple sclerosis evolution in these patients.

[1]  J. E. Tanner,et al.  Restricted Self‐Diffusion of Protons in Colloidal Systems by the Pulsed‐Gradient, Spin‐Echo Method , 1968 .

[2]  C F Hazlewood,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance measurement of skeletal muscle: anisotrophy of the diffusion coefficient of the intracellular water. , 1976, Biophysical journal.

[3]  J. Kurtzke.  Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Neurology.

[4]  P. Grenier,et al.  MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. , 1986, Radiology.

[5]  T. Chenevert,et al.  Anisotropic diffusion in human white matter: demonstration with MR techniques in vivo. , 1990, Radiology.

[6]  A. Thompson,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosis: concerted action guidelines. , 1991, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[7]  C. Thomsen,et al.  In vivo magnetic resonance diffusion measurement in the brain of patients with multiple sclerosis. , 1992, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  C. Thomsen,et al.  Increased water self‐diffusion in chronic plaques and in apparently normal white matter in patients with multiple sclerosis , 1993, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[9]  P. Basser,et al.  Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[10]  C. Beaulieu,et al.  Determinants of anisotropic water diffusion in nerves , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  R I Grossman,et al.  Microscopic disease in normal-appearing white matter on conventional MR images in patients with multiple sclerosis: assessment with magnetization-transfer measurements. , 1995, Radiology.

[12]  M Filippi,et al.  A Magnetization Transfer Imaging Study of Normal-Appearing White Matter in Multiple Sclerosis , 1995, Neurology.

[13]  David H. Miller,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficients in benign and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis by nuclear magnetic resonance , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Guidelines for the use of magnetic resonance techniques in monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosis , 1996, Annals of neurology.

[15]  P. Basser,et al.  Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. , 1996, Radiology.

[16]  M Rovaris,et al.  Improving interobserver variation in reporting gadolinium-enhanced MRI lesions in multiple sclerosis , 1997, Neurology.

[17]  D L Hill,et al.  Automated three-dimensional registration of magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography brain images by multiresolution optimization of voxel similarity measures. , 1997, Medical physics.

[18]  M Filippi,et al.  The role of non-conventional magnetic resonance techniques in monitoring evolution of multiple sclerosis. , 1998, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  S. Reingold,et al.  The role of magnetic resonance techniques in understanding and managing multiple sclerosis. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  M. Horsfield,et al.  Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  G. Barker,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging of lesions and normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis , 1999, Neurology.

[22]  G J Barker,et al.  Comparison of multiple sclerosis clinical subgroups using navigated spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[23]  P Wach,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging with navigated interleaved echo-planar imaging and a conventional gradient system. , 1999, Radiology.

[24]  M Filippi,et al.  Comparison of MS clinical phenotypes using conventional and magnetization transfer MRI , 1999, Neurology.

[25]  M Filippi,et al.  A magnetization transfer histogram study of normal-appearing brain tissue in MS , 2000, Neurology.

[26]  P. C. de Freitas Mathias,et al.  Insulin Secretion and Acetylcholinesterase Activity in Monosodium L-Glutamate-Induced Obese Mice , 2001, Hormone Research in Paediatrics.

[27]  M S Buchsbaum,et al.  Whole-brain diffusion MR histograms differ between MS subtypes , 2000, Neurology.

[28]  L. Wilkins,et al.  Fear recognition deficits after focal brain damage , 2000, Neurology.

[29]  B. I. Hendriks-Stegeman,et al.  A Novel Nonsense Mutation of the KAL Gene in Two Brothers withKallmann Syndrome , 2000, Hormone Research in Paediatrics.

[30]  G. Comi,et al.  Pathologic damage in MS assessed by diffusion-weighted and magnetization transfer MRI , 2000, Neurology.

[31]  M Cercignani,et al.  A quantitative study of water diffusion in multiple sclerosis lesions and normal-appearing white matter using echo-planar imaging. , 2000, Archives of neurology.

[32]  M. Horsfield,et al.  A conventional and magnetization transfer MRI study of the cervical cord in patients with MS , 2000, Neurology.

[33]  M Cercignani,et al.  Magnetisation transfer ratio and mean diffusivity of normal appearing white and grey matter from patients with multiple sclerosis , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[34]  M. Filippi,et al.  Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis , 2002, Topics in Neuroscience.