Performance assessment of a triple-frequency spaceborne cloud–precipitation radar concept using a global cloud-resolving model

Abstract. Multi-frequency radars offer enhanced detection of clouds and precipitation compared to single-frequency systems, and are able to make more accurate retrievals when several frequencies are available simultaneously. An evaluation of a spaceborne three-frequency Ku-/Ka-/W-band radar system is presented in this study, based on modeling radar reflectivities from the results of a global cloud-resolving model with a 875 m grid spacing. To produce the reflectivities, a scattering model has been developed for each of the hydrometeor types produced by the model, as well as for melting snow. The effects of attenuation and multiple scattering on the radar signal are modeled using a radiative transfer model, while nonuniform beam filling is reproduced with spatial averaging. The combined effects of these are then quantified both globally and in six localized case studies. Two different orbital scenarios using the same radar are compared. Overall, based on the results, it is expected that the proposed radar would detect a high-quality signal in most clouds and precipitation. The main exceptions are the thinnest clouds that are below the detection threshold of the W-band channel, and at the opposite end of the scale, heavy convective rainfall where a combination of attenuation, multiple scattering and nonuniform beam filling commonly cause significant deterioration of the signal; thus, while the latter can be generally detected, the quality of the retrievals is likely to be degraded.

[1]  P. Ray,et al.  Broadband complex refractive indices of ice and water. , 1972, Applied optics.

[2]  Alessandro Battaglia,et al.  Fast Lidar and Radar Multiple-Scattering Models. Part II: Wide-Angle Scattering Using the Time-Dependent Two-Stream Approximation , 2008 .

[3]  H. Yashiro,et al.  Deep moist atmospheric convection in a subkilometer global simulation , 2013 .

[4]  Jean-Loup Bezy,et al.  The EarthCARE mission: Mission concept and lidar instrument pre-development , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[5]  Takashi Nakajima,et al.  Diagnosis of the Warm Rain Process in Cloud-Resolving Models Using JointCloudSatand MODIS Observations , 2011 .

[6]  T. N. Krishnamurti,et al.  The status of the tropical rainfall measuring mission (TRMM) after two years in orbit , 2000 .

[7]  H. V. Hulst.  Light Scattering by Small Particles , 1957 .

[8]  Alan J. Geer,et al.  Improved scattering radiative transfer for frozen hydrometeors at microwave frequencies , 2014 .

[9]  Simone Tanelli,et al.  CloudSat's Cloud Profiling Radar After Two Years in Orbit: Performance, Calibration, and Processing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Jussi Leinonen,et al.  High-level interface to T-matrix scattering calculations: architecture, capabilities and limitations. , 2014, Optics express.

[11]  Simone Tanelli,et al.  Evidence of nonspheroidal behavior in millimeter-wavelength radar observations of snowfall , 2012 .

[12]  Ralf Bennartz,et al.  A triple‐frequency approach to retrieve microphysical snowfall parameters , 2011 .

[13]  Steven D. Miller,et al.  Rainfall retrieval over the ocean with spaceborne W‐band radar , 2009 .

[14]  R. Marchand,et al.  Hydrometeor Detection Using Cloudsat—An Earth-Orbiting 94-GHz Cloud Radar , 2008 .

[15]  Takeshi Miura,et al.  The orbital checkout status of the dual-frequency precipitation radar on the global precipitation measurement core spacecraft , 2014, 2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[16]  Simone Tanelli,et al.  Evaluation of EarthCARE Cloud Profiling Radar Doppler Velocity Measurements in Particle Sedimentation Regimes , 2014 .

[17]  A. Hou,et al.  The Global Precipitation Measurement Mission , 2014 .

[18]  John M. Haynes,et al.  COSP: Satellite simulation software for model assessment , 2011 .

[19]  Andrew J. Heymsfield,et al.  Ice Cloud Particle Size Distributions and Pressure-Dependent Terminal Velocities from In Situ Observations at Temperatures from 0° to −86°C , 2013 .

[20]  Frédéric Fabry,et al.  Modeling of the Melting Layer. Part II: Electromagnetic , 1999 .

[21]  Jussi Leinonen,et al.  What do triple‐frequency radar signatures reveal about aggregate snowflakes? , 2015 .

[22]  E. Clothiaux,et al.  Cloud Droplet Size Distributions in Low-Level Stratiform Clouds , 2000 .

[23]  Zhien Wang,et al.  Climatology of drizzle in marine boundary layer clouds based on 1 year of data from CloudSat and Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) , 2008 .

[24]  R. Marchand,et al.  A description of hydrometeor layer occurrence statistics derived from the first year of merged Cloudsat and CALIPSO data , 2009 .

[25]  Masaki Satoh,et al.  Nonhydrostatic icosahedral atmospheric model (NICAM) for global cloud resolving simulations , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[26]  Takemasa Miyoshi,et al.  The Non-hydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model: description and development , 2014, Progress in Earth and Planetary Science.

[27]  Clemens Simmer,et al.  Multiple-scattering in radar systems: A review , 2010 .

[28]  Tristan S. L'Ecuyer,et al.  The retrieval of warm rain from CloudSat , 2011 .

[29]  Hajime Okamoto,et al.  Evaluating cloud microphysics from NICAM against CloudSat and CALIPSO , 2013 .

[30]  Simone Tanelli,et al.  Next-generation spaceborne Cloud Profiling Radars , 2009, 2009 IEEE Radar Conference.

[31]  Guosheng Liu,et al.  Modeling the microwave single‐scattering properties of aggregate snowflakes , 2013 .

[32]  Wei Huang,et al.  Microwave Backscatter and Extinction by Soft Ice Spheres and Complex Snow Aggregates , 2010 .

[33]  S. Warren,et al.  Optical constants of ice from the ultraviolet to the microwave: A revised compilation , 2008 .

[34]  Guosheng Liu,et al.  A database of microwave single-scattering properties for nonspherical ice particles , 2008 .

[35]  Larry D. Travis,et al.  Capabilities and limitations of a current FORTRAN implementation of the T-matrix method for randomly oriented, rotationally symmetric scatterers , 1998 .

[36]  Hirofumi Tomita,et al.  A new dynamical framework of nonhydrostatic global model using the icosahedral grid , 2004 .

[37]  Hirofumi Tomita,et al.  New Microphysical Schemes with Five and Six Categories by Diagnostic Generation of Cloud Ice , 2008 .

[38]  Simone Tanelli,et al.  DOMUS: DOppler MUltiple-Scattering Simulator , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[39]  Jussi Leinonen,et al.  Radar Backscattering from Snowflakes: Comparison of Fractal, Aggregate, and Soft Spheroid Models , 2011 .

[40]  Simone Tanelli,et al.  Triple-Frequency Radar Reflectivity Signatures of Snow: Observations and Comparisons with Theoretical Ice Particle Scattering Models , 2014 .

[41]  Simone Tanelli,et al.  CloudSat mission: Performance and early science after the first year of operation , 2008 .

[42]  S. Tanelli,et al.  Multiple scattering in observations of the GPM dual‐frequency precipitation radar: Evidence and impact on retrievals , 2015, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[43]  Stephan Borrmann,et al.  Drop Shapes and Axis Ratio Distributions: Comparison between 2D Video Disdrometer and Wind-Tunnel Measurements , 2009 .