Joint identification and tracking of multiple CBRNE clouds based on sparsity pursuit

The evolution of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosive (CBRNE) clouds depends considerably on its composition. For example, cloud tracking usually relies on a diffusion model of the average atmospheric concentration of the CBRNE material; identification of its composition can benefit greatly from knowledge about the propagation of the compounds. As a result, substance classification and cloud tracking help each other significantly. However, few research efforts consider joint identification and tracking of CBRNE clouds using a network of possibly heterogeneous sensors. This paper deals with such joint identification and tracking. We assume that the chemical composition has a sparse representation in the Raman spectra with a reference library and apply a sparsity pursuit algorithm to adaptively refine the cloud propagation model based on the estimated composition. We demonstrate the benefit of joint identification and tracking of the aggregated clouds when individual substance has a different diffusion coefficient. The results also provide guidelines for selecting an appropriate sensor combination to accurately predict the cloud boundary.

[1]  Tong Zhao,et al.  Detecting and estimating biochemical dispersion of a moving source in a semi-infinite medium , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[2]  X. Rong Li,et al.  Source parameter estimation of atmospheric pollution using regularized least squares , 2008, 2008 11th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[3]  Tülay Adali,et al.  Subspace Partitioning for Target Detection and Identification , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[4]  T. Moriizumi,et al.  Controlling a gas/odor plume-tracking robot based on transient responses of gas sensors , 2005, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[5]  Tong Zhao,et al.  Distributed Sequential Bayesian Estimation of a Diffusive Source in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[6]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  A Sequential Detector for Biochemical Release in Realistic Environments , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[7]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Greed is good: algorithmic results for sparse approximation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Jay A. Farrell,et al.  Plume mapping via hidden Markov methods , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[9]  H. Ishida,et al.  Plume-Tracking Robots: A New Application of Chemical Sensors , 2001, The Biological Bulletin.

[10]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[11]  Aaron D. Lanterman,et al.  Algorithms and performance bounds for chemical identification under a Poisson model for Raman spectroscopy , 2009, 2009 12th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[12]  Steven Kay,et al.  Chemical detection and classification in Raman spectra , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[13]  John W. Fisher,et al.  Detection and Localization of Material Releases With Sparse Sensor Configurations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  Simon J. Godsill,et al.  Tracking of multiple contaminant clouds , 2009, 2009 12th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[15]  D. Torney,et al.  Radioactive source detection by sensor networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[16]  Arthur B. Maccabe,et al.  Radiation detection with distributed sensor networks , 2004, Computer.

[17]  Haesun Park,et al.  Comparison of Raman spectra estimation algorithms , 2009, 2009 12th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[18]  K. Nakamoto,et al.  Introductory Raman Spectroscopy , 1994 .

[19]  Yong Yang,et al.  A Sensor-cyber Network Testbed for Plume Detection, Identification, and Tracking , 2007, 2007 6th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[20]  G. Nofsinger,et al.  Distributed chemical plume process detection: MILCOM 2005 #1644 , 2005, MILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE Military Communications Conference.