Developmental and motivational perspectives on cooperative learning: a reconciliation

SLAVIN, ROBERT E. Developmental and Motivational Perspectives on Cooperative Learning: A Reconciliation. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1987, 58, 1161-1167. Research on cooperative learning strategies has been done from 2 major theoretical perspectives, developmental and motivational. The developmental perspective, based on Piagetian and Vygotskian theories, holds that task-focused interaction among students enhances learning by creating cognitive conflicts and by exposing students to higher-quality thinking that is within their proximal zones of development. In contrast, motivational theories of cooperative learning emphasize that rewarding groups on the basis of the individual learning of all group members creates peer norms and sanctions favoring achievementrelated efforts and active helping of peers. In the developmental view, incentives for group learning efforts are unnecessary or harmful, while in the motivationalist view they are crucial to enhanced learning outcomes. This article reviews research bearing on both the developmental and the motivational perspectives, and presents a theory reconciling these perspectives that emphasizes the role of group rewards for individual learning in motivating students to provide high-quality assistance and elaborated explanations to their group-mates.

[1]  J. Piaget The Language and Thought of the Child , 1927 .

[2]  M. Deutsch A Theory of Co-operation and Competition , 1949 .

[3]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  Mechanisms of Change in the Development of Cognitive Structures. , 1972 .

[4]  F. Murray,et al.  The efficacy of peer modeling and social conflict in the acquisition of conservation. , 1975, Child Development.

[5]  M. Robert,et al.  Observational Learning of Quantity Conservation and Piagetian Generalization Tasks. , 1976 .

[6]  S. Kagan,et al.  Development of Prosocial and Competitive Behaviors in Anglo-American and Mexican-American Children , 1977 .

[7]  W. Doise,et al.  Socio-cognitive conflict and structure of individual and collective performances , 1978 .

[8]  Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont Social interaction and cognitive development in children , 1980 .

[9]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Effects of Student Teams and Peer Tutoring on Academic Achievement and Time On-Task. , 1980 .

[10]  Alma E. Lantz,et al.  Factors influencing the choice of nonrequired mathematics courses. , 1981 .

[11]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. , 1981 .

[12]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Can conflict be constructive? Controversy versus concurrence seeking in learning groups. , 1981 .

[13]  Shari Ellis,et al.  The Strategies and Efficacy of Child versus Adult Teachers. , 1982 .

[14]  F. Murray,et al.  When two wrongs make a right: Promoting cognitive change by social conflict. , 1982 .

[15]  F. Murray Teaching through social conflict , 1982 .

[16]  R. Slavin When does cooperative learning increase student achievement , 1983 .

[17]  W. Damon Peer education: The untapped potential , 1984 .

[18]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn , 1985 .