A novel genealogical approach to neutral biodiversity theory

Current neutral theory in community ecology views local biodiversity as a result of the interplay between speciation, extinction and immigration. Simulations and a mean-field approximation have been used to study this neutral theory. As simulations have limitations of convergence and the mean-field approximation ignores dependencies between species' abundances when applied to species-abundance data, there is still no final conclusion whether the neutral theory or the traditional lognormal model describes community structure best. We present a novel analytical framework, based on the genealogy of individuals in the local community, to overcome the problems of previous approaches, and show, using Bayesian statistics, that the lognormal model provides a slightly better fit to the species-abundance distribution of a much-discussed tropical tree community. A key feature of our approach is that it shows the tight link between genetic and species diversity, which creates important perspectives to future integration of evolutionary and community ecological theory.

[1]  J. T. Cox,et al.  A SPATIAL MODEL FOR THE ABUNDANCE OF SPECIES , 1998 .

[2]  L. Cook,et al.  Evenness and species number in some moth populations , 1996 .

[3]  B. McGill.  A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity , 2003, Nature.

[4]  Joseph G. Ibrahim,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods in Bayesian Computation , 2000 .

[5]  P. Chesson,et al.  Environmental Variability Promotes Coexistence in Lottery Competitive Systems , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[6]  J. Kingman.  On the genealogy of large populations , 1982 .

[7]  Jérôme Chave,et al.  Neutral theory and community ecology , 2004 .

[8]  F. W. Preston.  The Commonness, And Rarity, of Species , 1948 .

[9]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Community Structure: A Neutral Model Analysis , 1976 .

[10]  R. Solé,et al.  Mean-field stochastic theory for species-rich assembled communities. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[11]  G. Hardy,et al.  Asymptotic Formulaæ in Combinatory Analysis , 1918 .

[12]  H. Olff,et al.  How Dispersal Limitation Shapes Species–Body Size Distributions in Local Communities , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[13]  A K Dewdney,et al.  A dynamical model of communities and a new species-abundance distribution. , 2000, The Biological bulletin.

[14]  M. Aitkin.  Posterior Bayes Factors , 1991 .

[15]  M. Vellend.  Island Biogeography of Genes and Species , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[16]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology , 2003, Nature.

[17]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Changes in tree species abundance in a Neotropical forest: impact of climate change , 1996, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[18]  J. McGregor,et al.  Addendum to a paper of W. Ewens. , 1972, Theoretical population biology.

[19]  M. Bulmer.  On Fitting the Poisson Lognormal Distribution to Species-Abundance Data , 1974 .

[20]  G. Bell,et al.  Environmental heterogeneity and species diversity of forest sedges , 2000 .

[21]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  S. Hubbell,et al.  A unified theory of biogeography and relative species abundance and its application to tropical rain forests and coral reefs , 1997, Coral Reefs.

[23]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Commonness and rarity in a neotropical forest: implications for tropical tree conservation , 1986 .

[24]  T. Fagerström.  Lotteries in communities of sessile organisms. , 1988, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  John Harte,et al.  Ecology: Tail of death and resurrection , 2003, Nature.

[26]  W. Ewens.  The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. , 1972, Theoretical population biology.