Role of local institutions in formulating climate change adaptation strategies for a low water future: A public policy perspective

This paper examines the role of local institutions in supporting climate change adaptation action from a public policy perspective. While certain adaptation actions will provide public benefits, many others will offer private benefits. The paper argues that adaptation investments and assigning the adaptation responsibility across various actors should be guided by a clear public-private benefit framework. A case study of adapting to a 'low water future' in North East Victoria is used to discuss the role of local institutions and industries in formulating climate change adaptation strategies. The findings indicate that formulating adaptation strategies, at the local level, has been complicated by the existence of considerable uncertainty in the nature and magnitude of adverse climatic impacts. The planning problem is further exacerbated by considerable information asymmetries and moral hazard issues inhibiting climate change adaptation for reduced water supply by local institutions and industries.

[1]  Natasha Vasey-Ellis Planning for Climate Change in Coastal Victoria , 2009 .

[2]  R. Buckley,et al.  Climate Response by the Ski Industry: The Shortcomings of Snowmaking for Australian Resorts , 2010, AMBIO.

[3]  Richard J. T. Klein,et al.  Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments: An Evolution of Conceptual Thinking , 2006 .

[4]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability , 2001 .

[5]  B. Dollery,et al.  Water Rights: A Comparison of the Impacts of Urban and Irrigation Reforms in Australia , 2006 .

[6]  D. Chambers,et al.  Moral hazard. , 2009, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[7]  Scott Baum,et al.  Local Urban Communities and Extreme Weather Events: Mapping Social Vulnerability to Flood , 2008 .

[8]  T. Wilbanks,et al.  Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[9]  Hans-Martin Füssel,et al.  Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research , 2007 .

[10]  H. Clarke Conserving biodiversity in the face of climate change , 2007 .

[11]  G. Edwards THE DESALINATION PLANT, THE NORTH-SOUTH PIPELINE AND THE WELFARE OF MELBURNIANS , 2012 .

[12]  D. Pannell Public Benefits, Private Benefits, and Policy Mechanism Choice for Land-Use Change for Environmental Benefits , 2008, Land Economics.

[13]  S. Turton,et al.  The impacts of climate change on Australian tourism destinations: developing adaptation and response strategies - a scoping study. , 2009 .

[14]  D. Rübbelke,et al.  Objectives of public economic policy and the adaptation to climate change , 2009 .

[15]  P. McManus,et al.  The Canary in the Coalmine: Australian Ski Resorts and their Response to Climate Change , 2006 .

[16]  M. Griffith Minimum Cost Feeding of Dairy Cows in Northern Victoria , 2010 .

[17]  W. Adger Social Vulnerability to Climate Change and Extremes in Coastal Vietnam , 1999 .

[18]  A. Agrawal The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change , 2008 .

[19]  R. Tol,et al.  Weathering Climate Change - Some Simple Rules to Guide Adaptation Decisions , 1999 .

[20]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[21]  L. Haden,et al.  Tourism and Climate Change: Costs and Benefits of Adaptation Measures in the Alpine Tourism. Assessment of Different Methods Including the Relevant Stakeholders, Konferenz Travel & Tourism in the Age of Climate Change, Eastbourne (GB), 10.07.2009 , 2009 .

[22]  Surya Dharma,et al.  Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences , 2011 .

[23]  R. Garnaut,et al.  The Garnaut Climate Change Review , 2008 .