Object detection in the ring scotoma of a monocular bioptic telescope.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the ability of the fellow eye to detect stimuli in the area corresponding to the ring scotoma (blind area) of a monocular bioptic telescope in simple conditions (conventional perimetry) and in more visually demanding conditions. METHODS A computerized dichoptic perimeter enabled separate stimuli to be presented to each eye of 7 bioptic users and 7 nonusers. The bioptic ring scotoma was mapped by presenting the stimulus to the telescope eye only. Detection tests were then conducted under binocular viewing, with stimuli presented only to the fellow eye in a 2 × 2 × 2 design with or without telescope, on plain gray or patterned (spatial noise) background, and with passive (looking at cross) or active (reading letters) fixation task. RESULTS No significant differences were noted in fellow-eye detection with (86%) and without (87%) a bioptic. The detection rate was significantly reduced on the patterned background and in the active fixation task. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate fellow-eye detection in the area of the ring scotoma with a monocular bioptic telescope under more realistic and visually demanding conditions than conventional perimetry. These results should ease the concern that the monocular ring scotoma might cause blindness to traffic outside the field of the telescope.

[1]  M. Brodsky,et al.  The prevalence of strabismus in congenital nystagmus: the influence of anterior visual pathway disease. , 1997, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[2]  M. C. Lewis,et al.  Bioptic Telescopic Spectacles and Driving Performance: A Study in Texas , 1988 .

[3]  Eli Peli,et al.  Bioptic telescopes meet the needs of drivers with moderate visual acuity loss. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  L. Lack Selective attention and the control of binocular rivalry , 1978 .

[5]  E. Peli,et al.  Image invariance with changes in size: the role of peripheral contrast thresholds. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  D. Korb PREPARING THE VISUALLY HANDICAPPED PERSON FOR MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATION* , 1970, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[7]  A JAMPOLSKY,et al.  Characteristics of suppression in strabismus. , 1955, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  Daniel B Wright,et al.  Graphing within-subjects confidence intervals using SPSS and S-Plus , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[9]  A H Keeney Editorial: Field loss vs central magnification. Telescopes and the driving risk. , 1974, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  Irene Gottlob,et al.  Clinical and oculomotor characteristics of albinism compared to FRMD7 associated infantile nystagmus. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  Aart C. Kooijman,et al.  A Demonstration Project on Driving with Reduced Visual Acuity and a Bioptic Telescope System in the Netherlands , 2008 .

[12]  N. Schuster,et al.  American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators , 2011 .

[13]  K M Daum,et al.  Clinical Characteristics of Anomalous Correspondence , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[14]  Gang Luo,et al.  The effect of strabismus on object detection in the ring scotoma of a monocular bioptic telescope , 2013, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[15]  W. Feinbloom Driving with Bioptic Telescopic Spectacles (BTS)* , 1977, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[16]  Alex Chaparro,et al.  Effects of Age and Auditory and Visual Dual Tasks on Closed-Road Driving Performance , 2005 .

[17]  A H Keeney,et al.  Functional problems of telescopic spectacles in the driving task. , 1974, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[18]  Karen Brondum-Nielsen,et al.  Oculocutaneous albinism , 2007, Orphanet journal of rare diseases.

[19]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[20]  Harold E. Bedell,et al.  Perception of a Clear and Stable Visual World with Congenital Nystagmus , 2000, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[21]  R. Blake,et al.  Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[22]  W. Geisler Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone , 2001, Psychological science.

[25]  Rick Gurnsey,et al.  Crowding is size and eccentricity dependent. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[26]  R. Blake © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 5 A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies , 2000 .

[27]  Eli Peli,et al.  DLP-based dichoptic vision test system. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[28]  S Coren,et al.  Sighting Dominance and Binocular Rivalry , 1978, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[29]  J. Cardell,et al.  CLINICAL REFRACTION , 1959 .

[30]  Leonard B. Nelson Harley's Pediatric Ophthalmology , 2013 .

[31]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness: The Role of Attention , 1999, Perception.

[32]  Kara E MacLeod,et al.  Driving cessation and increased depressive symptoms. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[33]  K. Pearson On the Theory of Contingency and Its Relation to Association and Normal Correlation , 2013 .

[34]  S. Maxwell,et al.  On Using Analysis Of Covariance In Repeated Measures Designs. , 1981, Multivariate behavioral research.

[35]  J. Pratt-johnson,et al.  Suppression in strabismus--an update. , 1984, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[36]  Bruno Bagolini,et al.  Anomalous correspondence: Definition and diagnostic methods , 1967, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[37]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  R. Blake,et al.  Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[39]  D. Kelleher,et al.  Motor vehicle operation by a patient with low vision: a case report. , 1971, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[40]  E Peli,et al.  Vision Multiplexing: an Engineering Approach to Vision Rehabilitation Device Development , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[41]  W. L. Park,et al.  A profile of the demographics, training and driving history of telescopic drivers in the state of Michigan. , 1995, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[42]  G. Fonda Bioptic telescopic spectacle is a hazard for operating a motor vehicle. , 1983, Archives of ophthalmology.

[43]  Elena Piedrahita,et al.  Ocular dominance diagnosis and its influence in monovision. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[44]  C. Owsley Driving with bioptic telescopes: organizing a research agenda. , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[45]  James Algina Remarks On The Analysis Of Covariance In Repeated Measures Designs , 1982 .