Contrasting physiological and structural vegetation feedbacks in climate change simulations

Anthropogenic increases in the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are predicted to cause a warming of the global climate by modifying radiative forcing. Carbon dioxide concentration increases may make a further contribution to warming by inducing a physiological response of the global vegetation—a reduced stomatal conductance, which suppresses transpiration. Moreover, a CO2-enriched atmosphere and the corresponding change in climate may also alter the density of vegetation cover, thus modifying the physicalcharacteristics of the land surface to provide yet another climate feedback. But such feedbacks from changes in vegetation structure have not yet been incorporated into general circulation model predictions of future climate change. Here we use a general circulation model iteratively coupled to an equilibrium vegetation model to quantify the effects of both physiological and structural vegetation feedbacks on a doubled-CO2 climate. On a global scale, changes in vegetation structure are found to partially offset physiological vegetation–climate feedbacks in the long term, but overall vegetation feedbacks provide significant regional-scale effects.

[1]  P. Rowntree,et al.  Simulation of the atmospheric response to soil moisture anomalies over Europe , 1983 .

[2]  P. Milly,et al.  Sensitivity of the Global Water Cycle to the Water-Holding Capacity of Land , 1994 .

[3]  J. M. Gregory,et al.  Climate response to increasing levels of greenhouse gases and sulphate aerosols , 1995, Nature.

[4]  Thomas J. Schmugge,et al.  Land Surface Evaporation , 1991 .

[5]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  A global land primary productivity and phytogeography model , 1995 .

[6]  J. Pontailler,et al.  Evapotranspiration of a deciduous forest: Simulation using routine meteorological data , 1984 .

[7]  Richard G. Jones,et al.  Simulation of climate change over europe using a nested regional‐climate model. I: Assessment of control climate, including sensitivity to location of lateral boundaries , 1995 .

[8]  Miller,et al.  The Anomalous Rainfall over the United States during July 1993: Sensitivity to Land Surface Parameterization and Soil Moisture Anomalies , 1996 .

[9]  G. Bonan,et al.  Effects of boreal forest vegetation on global climate , 1992, Nature.

[10]  A. Dalcher,et al.  A Simple Biosphere Model (SIB) for Use within General Circulation Models , 1986 .

[11]  J. Kutzbach,et al.  Feedbacks between climate and boreal forests during the Holocene epoch , 1994, Nature.

[12]  G. Watts,et al.  Climate Change 1995 , 1998 .

[13]  A. Henderson‐sellers,et al.  A global archive of land cover and soils data for use in general circulation climate models , 1985 .

[14]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  Carbon Dioxide and Climate. The Impact of Cloud Parameterization , 1993 .

[15]  P. Rowntree,et al.  Atmospheric Parameterization Schemes for Evaporation over Land: Basic Concepts and Climate Modeling Aspects , 1991 .

[16]  G. J. Collatz,et al.  Comparison of Radiative and Physiological Effects of Doubled Atmospheric CO2 on Climate , 1996, Science.

[17]  R. Shaw,et al.  Aerodynamic roughness of a plant canopy: A numerical experiment , 1982 .

[18]  P. Rowntree,et al.  A GCM simulation of the impact of Amazonian deforestation on climate using an improved canopy representation , 1993 .

[19]  J. Kutzbach,et al.  Role of orbitally induced changes in tundra area in the onset of glaciation , 1996, Nature.