Merkel cells are not the mechanosensory transducers in the touch dome of the rat

SummaryThe identity of the mechanosensory transducing elements in the vertebrate touch receptors that contain Merkel cell-neurite complexes is unknown. The Merkel cells, however, have long been the favoured candidates. We have now selectively eliminated the Merkel cells from rat touch domes by first loading them with quinacrine, and then irradiating the domes with near-UV light. Mechanical stimulation of these domes revealed a range of mechanosensory function, evaluated qualitatively, that varied from non-responsive to normal. Since irradiation eliminated the quinacrine fluorescence, the status of the Merkel cells was evaluated by EM. In both responsive and unresponsive domes fixed for EM immediately following irradiation, the Merkel cells and associated nerve endings appeared to be normal. After 2 or more days, even in domes that continued to be normally responsive, there was a striking reduction in the normal complement of about 90 Merkel cells, and most of the remaining Merkel cells appeared to be degenerating. However, numerous ‘isolated’ (Merkel cell-free) nerve endings remained in the basal epidermis. A few of these nerve endings showed signs of damage, but in the non-responsive domes abnormal nerve endings were routinely observed. The EM studies did not exclude the possibility that a few surviving innervated Merkel cells, or even one such, had escaped detection and were responsible for a persisting mechanosensitivity. To resolve this issue a mechanical stimulating technique with a spatial resolution of 55 μm was used to map the mechanosensory profile of a single responsive dome irradiated 2.75 days earlier. This dome was then serially sectioned for EM study. Only seven Merkel cells had survived which appeared to be both viable and innervated, but almost all of the tested sites were normally responsive. When the correlation was made, seven of these sites were located 55–100 μm away from the nearest surviving Merkel cell, four were 110–165 μm away, and three were more than 165 μm away. Even when allowance is made for errors in the positioning of the stimulus, the responses at the last seven sites cannot be attributed to the presence of underlying Merkel cells. We conclude that mechanosensory transduction within touch domes is not a function of the Merkel cells, but must reside in the associated nerve endings.

[1]  S. A. Scott,et al.  Merkel cells as targets of the mechanosensory nerves in salamander skin , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[2]  P. R. Burgess,et al.  Development of rat Merkel cells , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  C. Turner,et al.  The effects of nerve section and of colchicine treatment on the density of mechanosensory nerve endings in salamander skin. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  F. Johnson An Atlas of the Ultrastructure of Human Skin , 1971 .

[5]  A. Iggo,et al.  Functional characteristics of mechanoreceptors in sinus hair follicles of the cat , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  R. Moll,et al.  Identification of Merkel cells in human skin by specific cytokeratin antibodies: changes of cell density and distribution in fetal and adult plantar epidermis. , 1984, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[7]  A. Yoshida,et al.  Oral and facial representation in the trigeminal principal and rostral spinal nuclei of the cat , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  K. Hashimoto,et al.  The specialized junctions between Merkel cell and neurite: an electron microscopic study. , 1979, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[9]  E. Weihe,et al.  Fine structural analysis of the synaptic junction of Merkel cell-axon-complexes. , 1980, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[10]  N. Cauna Morphological basis of sensation in hairy skin. , 1976, Progress in brain research.

[11]  L R Mills,et al.  Evidence that the Merkel cell is not the transducer in the mechanosensory Merkel cell-neurite complex. , 1988, Progress in brain research.

[12]  K. Horch,et al.  Effects of chronic denervation in type I cutaneous mechanoreceptors (Haarscheiben) , 1983, The Anatomical record.

[13]  E. Weihe,et al.  The Merkel Cell , 1986 .

[14]  J. Diamond,et al.  A quantitative study of the time course of the reduction in merkel cell number within denervated rat touch domes , 1984, Neuroscience.

[15]  J. Milne Atlas of the Ultrastructure of Human Skin , 1972 .

[16]  W. Loewenstein,et al.  Components of receptor adaptation in a Pacinian corpuscle , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  F. Merkel Tastzellen und Tastkörperchen bei den Hausthieren und beim Menschen , 1875 .

[18]  C. Nurse,et al.  The neural dependency of Merkel cell development in the rat: the touch domes and foot pads contrasted. , 1989, Developmental biology.

[19]  Lewis Wolpert,et al.  Chapter 6 Positional Information and Pattern Formation , 1971 .

[20]  K. Andres,et al.  Morphology of cutaneous receptors. , 1982, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  J. Diamond,et al.  Merkel cells and the mechanosensitivity of normal and regenerating nerves in Xenopus skin , 1988, Neuroscience.

[22]  J. I. Johnson,et al.  The development of receptors in the glabrous forepaw skin of pouch young opossums , 1980, Neuroscience.

[23]  W. Hamann,et al.  Acute effects of neomycin on slowly adapting type I and type II cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the anaesthetized cat and rat. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  M. Holmes,et al.  Axonal domains within shared touch domes in the rat: A comparison of their fate during conditions favoring collateral sprouting and following axonal regeneration , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[25]  K. Gottschaldt,et al.  Merkel cell receptors: structure and transducer function. , 1981, Science.

[26]  F. N. Ghadially Ultrastructural pathology of the cell and matrix , 1988 .

[27]  C. Nurse,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies on Merkel Cells Isolated from Rat Vibrissal Mechanoreceptors , 1988 .

[28]  R. Winkelmann,et al.  The Merkel cell. , 1972, The Japanese journal of dermatology. Ser. B.

[29]  M. da Prada,et al.  Accumulation of basic drugs in 5-hydroxytryptamine storage organelles of rabbit blood platelets. , 1975, European journal of pharmacology.

[30]  A. R. Muir,et al.  The structure and function of a slowly adapting touch corpuscle in hairy skin , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  J. Saurat,et al.  Relationship between Merkel cells and nerve endings during embryogenesis in the mouse epidermis. , 1990, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[32]  A S Breathnach,et al.  Electron microscopy of cutaneous nerves and receptors. , 1977, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[33]  E. Perl,et al.  Fine structure of myelinated mechanical nociceptor endings in cat hairy skin , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  The Merkel cells and the rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors of the salamander skin , 1977, Neuroscience.

[35]  K. Inoue,et al.  Morphological and morphometric studies with the electron microscope on the Merkel cells and associated nerve terminals of normal and denervated skin. , 1979, Archivum histologicum Japonicum = Nihon soshikigaku kiroku.

[36]  T. Ochiai,et al.  Fine structural and morphometric studies of the Merkel cell during fetal and postnatal development. , 1981, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[37]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile sensory coding in the glabrous skin of the human hand , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[38]  K. Smith,et al.  The structure and function of the Haarscheibe , 1967, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[39]  B L Munger,et al.  THE INTRAEPIDERMAL INNERVATION OF THE SNOUT SKIN OF THE OPOSSUM , 1965, The Journal of cell biology.

[40]  K. B. English The ultrastructure of cutaneous type I mechanoreceptors (Haarscheiben) in cats following denervation , 1977, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[41]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  C. Nurse,et al.  Reinnervation of the rat touch dome restores the Merkel cell population reduced after denervation , 1984, Neuroscience.

[43]  C. Nurse,et al.  Are Merkel cell‐neurite reciprocal synapses involved in the initiation of tactile responses in salamander skin? , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[44]  R. Winkelmann The Merkel cell system and a comparison between it and the neurosecretory or APUD cell system. , 1977, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[45]  T. Tachibana,et al.  Merkel cell differentiation in the labial mucous epithelium of the rabbit. , 1980, Journal of anatomy.

[46]  F. Merkel Über die Endigungen der sensiblen Nerven in der Haut der Wirbelthiere , 1880 .

[47]  B L Munger,et al.  The early embryogenesis of papillary (sweat duct) ridges in primate glabrous skin: The dermatotopic map of cutaneous mechanoreceptors and dermatoglyphics , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[48]  J. Diamond,et al.  Temporal and spatial constraints on the collateral sprouting of low‐threshold mechanosensory nerves in the skin of rats , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[49]  K. Kurosumi,et al.  Fine structures of Merkel cells and associated nerve fibers in the epidermis of certain mammalian species. , 1969, Archivum histologicum Japonicum = Nihon soshikigaku kiroku.

[50]  B. Munger Neural-epithelial interactions in sensory receptors. , 1977, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[51]  B. Munger,et al.  The sensory innervation of primate eyelid , 1980, The Anatomical record.

[52]  K W Horch,et al.  Impulse generation in type I cutaneous mechanoreceptors. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.