No Higher Criticism of the Bianchi-corrected Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe data

Higher Criticism (HC) has been proposed by Donoho & Jin as an effective statistic to detect deviations from Gaussianity. Motivated by the success of the Bianchi VIIh model in addressing many of the anomalies observed in the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) data (Jaffe et al.), we present calculations in real and in wavelet space of the HC statistic of the Bianchi-corrected WMAP first-year data. At the wavelet scale of 5°, the HC of the WMAP map drops from a value above the 99 per cent confidence level (c.l.) to a value below the 68 per cent CL when corrected by the Bianchi template. An important property of the HC statistic is its ability to locate the pixels that account for the deviation from Gaussianity. The analysis of the uncorrected WMAP data pointed to a cold spot in the Southern hemisphere, centred at l ~ 209°, b ~ −57°. The HC of the Bianchi-corrected map indicates that this spot remains prominent, albeit at a level completely consistent with Gaussian statistics. Consequently, it is debatable how much emphasis should be placed on this residual feature, but we consider the effect of modestly increasing the scaling of the template. A factor of only 1.2 renders the spot indistinguishable from the background level, with no noticeable impact on the results published in Jaffe et al. for the low-l anomalies, large-scale power asymmetry or wavelet kurtosis. A trivial interpretation would be that the Bianchi template may require a small enhancement of power on scales corresponding to the wavelet scale of 5°.

[1]  J. Barrow,et al.  Universal rotation - How large can it be? , 1985 .

[2]  C. Genovese,et al.  Examining the Effect of the Map-making Algorithm on Observed Power Asymmetry in WMAP Data , 2005, astro-ph/0510406.

[3]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Mining Thick Skylines over Large Databases , 2004, PKDD.

[4]  C. Lawrence,et al.  Evolution of Large-Scale Structure , 1998 .

[5]  B. Wandelt,et al.  The Hot and Cold Spots in the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe Data Are Not Hot and Cold Enough , 2004 .

[6]  H. K. Eriksen,et al.  On Foreground Removal from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe Data by an Internal Linear Combination Method: Limitations and Implications , 2004, astro-ph/0403098.

[7]  P. Lilje,et al.  Multipole Vector Anomalies in the First-Year WMAP Data: A Cut-Sky Analysis , 2005, astro-ph/0507186.

[8]  Non-Gaussian signatures in the temperature fluctuation observed by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe , 2003, astro-ph/0307469.

[9]  J. D. McEwen,et al.  A high-significance detection of non-Gaussianity in the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe 1-yr data using directional spherical wavelets , 2004, astro-ph/0406604.

[10]  Edward J. Wollack,et al.  First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Preliminary Maps and Basic Results , 2003, astro-ph/0302207.

[11]  H. K. Eriksen,et al.  Testing for Non-Gaussianity in the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe Data: Minkowski Functionals and the Length of the Skeleton , 2004 .

[12]  K. Gorski,et al.  Cosmological parameters and the WMAP data revisited , 2004, astro-ph/0406232.

[13]  P. Vielva,et al.  Detection of a non‐Gaussian spot in WMAP , 2004 .

[14]  Is the low-l microwave background cosmic? , 2004, Physical review letters.

[15]  K. Tomita Second-order gravitational effects of local inhomogeneities on cmb anisotropies and non-gaussian signatures , 2005, astro-ph/0509518.

[16]  Pia Mukherjee,et al.  Wavelets and Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe Non-Gaussianity , 2004, astro-ph/0402602.

[17]  M. Halpern,et al.  First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Tests of Gaussianity , 2003 .

[18]  Matias Zaldarriaga,et al.  Significance of the largest scale CMB fluctuations in WMAP , 2003, astro-ph/0307282.

[19]  Testing the cosmological principle of isotropy: Local power spectrum estimates of the WMAP data , 2004, astro-ph/0404206.

[20]  Shuang-Nan Zhang,et al.  Non-Gaussianity Due to Possible Residual Foreground Signals in Wilkinson Microwave Anistropy Probe First-Year Data Using Spherical Wavelet Approaches , 2005, astro-ph/0504589.

[21]  L. Cayon,et al.  Higher Criticism statistic: detecting and identifying non-Gaussianity in the WMAP first-year data , 2005 .

[22]  R. Tojeiro,et al.  Non-Gaussianity in the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe data using the peak–peak correlation function , 2006 .

[23]  K. Land,et al.  Template fitting and the large-angle cosmic microwave background anomalies , 2006 .

[24]  K. Land,et al.  Examination of evidence for a preferred axis in the cosmic radiation anisotropy. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[25]  Evidence of Vorticity and Shear at Large Angular Scales in the WMAP Data: A Violation of Cosmological Isotropy? , 2005, astro-ph/0503213.

[26]  D. Donoho,et al.  Higher criticism for detecting sparse heterogeneous mixtures , 2004, math/0410072.

[27]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Isotropy of the early universe from CMB anisotropies , 2004, astro-ph/0411237.

[28]  P. Lilje,et al.  Asymmetries in the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy Field , 2004 .

[29]  Yun Wang,et al.  Wavelets and Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe Non-Gaussianity , 2004 .

[30]  P. Vielva,et al.  Detection of Non-Gaussianity in the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe First-Year Data Using Spherical Wavelets , 2004 .