Empirically Grounded Developments of Legal Ontologies: A Socio-Legal Perspective

This paper shows the multiple relationships between empirical data and semantic content in the legal field. One of the well-known problems of ontology construction is the “knowledge acquisition bottleneck problem” pointed out many years ago by Edward Feigenbaum and others. This problem has not been completely solved in the next generation of Semantic Web developments. It is our contention that both an accurate description of the legal environment and well-grounded previous sociological studies may help to address it in a more satisfactory way. This means adopting a user-centered approach to legal ontologies, in what we will call an “iterative and integrated pragmatic cycle” involving legal theorists, socio-legal researchers, professional people (lawyers, magistrates, prosecutors…) and computer scientists. We describe the example of how the ontology of iuriservice was built up.

[1]  John R. Davis,et al.  Global Restructuring and the Law: Studies of the Internationalization of Legal Fields and the Creation of Transitional Arenas , 1994 .

[2]  Guus Schreiber,et al.  Knowledge Engineering and Management: The CommonKADS Methodology , 1999 .

[3]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Supporting newly-appointed judges: a legal knowledge management case study , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[4]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Modeling Expert Knowledge in the Mediation Domain: A Mediation Core Ontology , 2009 .

[5]  Aleksander Peczenik,et al.  Scientia Iuris - An Unsolved Philosophical Problem , 2000 .

[6]  Edward A. Feigenbaum,et al.  A personal view of expert systems: Looking back and looking ahead , 1992 .

[7]  N. F. Noy,et al.  Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology , 2001 .

[8]  David B. Martin,et al.  Applying patterns of cooperative interaction to work (re)design: e-government and planning , 2002, CHI.

[9]  David M. Trubek.  Back to the Future: The Short, Happy Life of the Law and Society Movement , 1990 .

[10]  Núria Casellas Caralt.  Modelling legal knowledge through ontologies. OPJK: the ontology of professional judicial knowledge , 2008 .

[11]  S. Verba,et al.  The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, An Analytic Study , 1964 .

[12]  S. Verba,et al.  The Civic Culture , 1963 .

[13]  David B. Martin,et al.  Patterns of cooperative interaction: linking ethnomethodology and design , 2004, INTR.

[14]  Erhard Blankenburg,et al.  Patterns of Legal Culture: The Netherlands compared to Neighboring Germany , 1998 .

[15]  Brian Z. Tamanaha,et al.  A general jurisprudence of law and society , 2001 .

[16]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Law and the Semantic Web: Legal Ontologies, Methodologies, Legal Information Retrieval, and Applications , 2005, Law and the Semantic Web.

[17]  Sally Jackson.  Disputation by Design , 1998 .

[18]  Francesco Contini,et al.  ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector: European Studies in the Making of E-Government , 2008 .

[19]  Paul Controverses Autour de L'ontologie du Droit,et al.  Controversies About Law's Ontology , 1991 .

[20]  Diana E. Forsythe,et al.  Knowledge acquisition for expert systems: some pitfalls and suggestions , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[21]  Scott Jacobs,et al.  Maintaining neutrality in dispute mediation: managing disagreement while managing not to disagree , 2002 .

[22]  William L. Stull,et al.  Beginners: The Original Version of What We Talk about When We Talk about Love , 2010 .

[23]  York Sure.  Methodology, tools & case studies for ontology based knowledge management [online] , 2003 .

[24]  Erhard Blankenburg,et al.  Disputes and litigation , 1991 .

[25]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  The e-Sentencias Prototype: A Procedural Ontology for Legal Multimedia Applications in the Spanish Civil Courts , 2009, Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web.

[26]  Lawrence M. Friedman,et al.  The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective , 1975 .

[27]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Ontological Engineering: With Examples from the Areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web , 2004, Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing.

[28]  Mercedes Ayuso,et al.  Statistical Study of Judicial Practices , 2003, Law and the Semantic Web.

[29]  John R. Davis,et al.  Global Restructuring and the Law: The Internationalization of Legal Fields and the Creation of Transnational Arenas , 1994 .

[30]  Francesco Contini,et al.  Justice and Technology in EUrope: How ICT is Changing the Judicial Business , 2001 .

[31]  Nicholas Ross Milton,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition in Practice: A Step-by-step Guide , 2007 .

[32]  Alan Aldrich,et al.  Crafting Communication Activity: Understanding Felicity in "I Wish I. . . " Compliments , 2002 .

[33]  Mariano Fernández-López,et al.  Ontological Engineering , 2003, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[34]  Nigel Shadbolt,et al.  Knowledge Engineering and Management , 2000 .

[35]  Francesco Contini,et al.  ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector , 2009 .

[36]  Christoph Tempich,et al.  Ontology Engineering Methodologies , 2006 .

[37]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Iuriservice: An Intelligent Frequently Asked Questions System to Assist Newly Appointed Judges , 2003, Law and the Semantic Web.

[38]  Giovanni Sartor,et al.  The Legal Theory Perspective: Doctrinal Conceptual Systems vs. Computational Ontologies , 2011, Approaches to Legal Ontologies.

[39]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Semantic enhancement for legal information retrieval: Iuriservice performance , 2007, ICAIL.

[40]  Lawrence M. Friedman,et al.  Legal Culture in the Age of Globalization: Latin America and Latin Europe , 2003 .

[41]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  An Ontology-Based Decision Support System for Judges , 2009, Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web.

[42]  P. D. Long,et al.  What We Talk about When We Talk about , 2009 .

[43]  José Luis Molina,et al.  Dimensiones del pluralismo jurídico , 2003 .

[44]  Richard L. Abel.  The Law & society reader , 1995 .

[45]  W. Clancey.  Representations of knowing: in defense of cognitive apprenticeship , 1992 .

[46]  Jaap Hage,et al.  The law as a dynamic interconnected system of states of affairs: a legal top ontology , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[47]  Juan Josep Vallbé Fernández.  Models of decision-making: facing uncertainty in spanish judicial settings , 2009 .

[48]  Aleksander Peczenik,et al.  Scientia juris : legal doctrine as knowledge of law and as a sources of law , 2005 .