Interorganizational Partnerships as Inchoate Hierarchies

Scholars often view interorganizational partnerships through the conceptual lens of social network theory. This article argues that some partnerships can be usefully viewed in a different way—as organizations in development rather than as examples of unstructured cooperation. Examining two partnerships between police departments and community development corporations, the article shows how common problems associated with unstructured cooperation led participants to formalize their collaborations by adopting several features of formal organization. The findings suggest that many partnerships may look as much like hierarchies as networks and, therefore, that the social networks lens may offer an incomplete picture of partnerships.

[1]  S. Barley,et al.  Bringing Work Back In , 2001 .

[2]  W. Westley,et al.  Violence and the Police , 1953, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[4]  R. Chang.  Incommensurability, incomparability, and practical reason , 1997 .

[5]  J. Dewey.  Human Nature and Conduct , 1921 .

[6]  J. Elster,et al.  Constitutionalism and Democracy: Notes on contributors , 1988 .

[7]  C. Sabel.  Studied Trust: Building New Forms of Cooperation in a Volatile Economy , 1993 .

[8]  Robert Agranoff,et al.  New Governance for Rural America: Creating Intergovernmental Partnerships , 1996 .

[9]  Mark H. Moore,et al.  Creating Public Value , 2017 .

[10]  J. Dewey,et al.  The Middle Works, 1899-1924 , 1976 .

[11]  Equity and community policing: A new view of community partnerships , 2001 .

[12]  B. Gray.  Conditions Facilitating Interorganizational Collaboration , 1985 .

[13]  B. Weiner,et al.  The Challenges of Governing Public-Private Community Health Partnerships , 1998, Health care management review.

[14]  Myrna Mandell,et al.  Strategies for Managing Intergovernmental Policies and Networks , 1990 .

[15]  P. Adler.  Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism , 2001 .

[16]  David Thacher.  Conflicting Values in Community Policing , 2001 .

[17]  N. Smelser,et al.  Handbook of Economic Sociology , 1994 .

[18]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems , 1999 .

[19]  F. Caron,et al.  Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme , 2000 .

[20]  Jon Pierre,et al.  Handbook of public administration , 2003 .

[21]  James A. Davis,et al.  Constructing social research , 1994 .

[22]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  Institutional-level norms and organizational involvement in a service-implementation network , 1991 .

[23]  Anne E. Mulder,et al.  Building Effective Partnerships. , 1991 .

[24]  M. Rein.  From Policy to Practice , 1983 .

[25]  R. Dworkin.  Law's Empire , 1987 .

[26]  Joshua Cohen,et al.  Directly‐Deliberative Polyarchy , 1997 .

[27]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Games in Hierarchies and Networks , 1993 .

[28]  E. Millgram.  Ethics Done Right: Incommensurability and Practical Reasoning , 2005 .

[29]  M. Burawoy.  The Extended Case Method* , 1998 .

[30]  L. O'toole.  Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration , 1997 .

[31]  M. Feldman,et al.  Organizational Routines as Sources of Connections and Understandings , 2002 .

[32]  Rachel G. Bratt,et al.  Networks and nonprofits: Opportunities and challenges in an era of federal devolution , 1996 .

[33]  S. Holmes.  Constitutionalism and Democracy: Gag rules or the politics of omission , 1988 .