Arthrodial Joint Markerless Cross-Parameterization and Biomechanical Visualization

Orthopedists invest significant amounts of effort and time trying to understand the biomechanics of arthrodial (gliding) joints. Although new image acquisition and processing methods currently generate richer-than-ever geometry and kinematic data sets that are individual specific, the computational and visualization tools needed to enable the comparative analysis and exploration of these data sets lag behind. In this paper, we present a framework that enables the cross-data-set visual exploration and analysis of arthrodial joint biomechanics. Central to our approach is a computer-vision-inspired markerless method for establishing pairwise correspondences between individual-specific geometry. Manifold models are subsequently defined and deformed from one individual-specific geometry to another such that the markerless correspondences are preserved while minimizing model distortion. The resulting mutually consistent parameterization and visualization allow the users to explore the similarities and differences between two data sets and to define meaningful quantitative measures. We present two applications of this framework to human-wrist data: articular cartilage transfer from cadaver data to in vivo data and cross-data-set kinematics analysis. The method allows our users to combine complementary geometries acquired through different modalities and thus overcome current imaging limitations. The results demonstrate that the technique is useful in the study of normal and injured anatomy and kinematics of arthrodial joints. In principle, the pairwise cross-parameterization method applies to all spherical topology data from the same class and should be particularly beneficial in instances where identifying salient object features is a nontrivial task.

[1]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Parametrization of Closed Surfaces for 3-D Shape Description , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[3]  Ch. Brechbuhler,et al.  Parameterisation of closed surfaces for 3-D shape description , 1995 .

[4]  John F. Hughes,et al.  Modeling surfaces of arbitrary topology using manifolds , 1995, SIGGRAPH.

[5]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[6]  William Schroeder,et al.  The Visualization Toolkit: An Object-Oriented Approach to 3-D Graphics , 1997 .

[7]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  Automatic construction of eigenshape models by direct optimization , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  J. Crisco,et al.  Noninvasive technique for measuring in vivo three‐dimensional carpal bone kinematics , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  Andrew E. Johnson,et al.  Using Spin Images for Efficient Object Recognition in Cluttered 3D Scenes , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  J. Snel,et al.  Quantitative in vivo analysis of the kinematics of carpal bones from three-dimensional CT images using a deformable surface model and a three-dimensional matching technique. , 2000, Medical physics.

[11]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Small Sample Size Learning for Shape Analysis of Anatomical Structures , 2000, MICCAI.

[12]  S. Mauch A Fast Algorithm for Computing the Closest Point and Distance Transform , 2000 .

[13]  Lawrence H. Staib,et al.  Shape-based 3D surface correspondence using geodesics and local geometry , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[14]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  Construction of 3D Shape Models of Femoral Articular Cartilage Using Harmonic Maps , 2000, MICCAI.

[15]  Peter Schröder,et al.  Consistent mesh parameterizations , 2001, SIGGRAPH.

[16]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modeling , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Joseph J Crisco,et al.  Fitting manifold surfaces to three-dimensional point clouds. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  Martin Styner,et al.  Evaluation of 3D Correspondence Methods for Model Building , 2003, IPMI.

[19]  G. Elisabeta Marai,et al.  Estimating joint contact areas and ligament lengths from bone kinematics and surfaces , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  John M. Schreiner,et al.  Inter-surface mapping , 2004, SIGGRAPH 2004.

[21]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  New feature points based on geometric invariants for 3D image registration , 1996, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[22]  Martin Styner,et al.  Automatic and Robust Computation of 3D Medial Models Incorporating Object Variability , 2003, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[23]  Vladislav Kraevoy,et al.  Cross-parameterization and compatible remeshing of 3D models , 2004, SIGGRAPH 2004.

[24]  Michael Garland,et al.  Curvature maps for local shape comparison , 2005, International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications 2005 (SMI' 05).

[25]  Markerless inter-subject bone shape matching using 2 D projections , 2005 .

[26]  G. Elisabeta Marai,et al.  Super-resolution registration using tissue-classified distance fields , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  G. E. Marai,et al.  Effects of distal radius malunion on distal radioulnar joint mechanics—an in vivo study , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.