Feed-Forward Controlling of Servo-Hydraulic Actuators Utilizing a Least-Squares Support-Vector Machine

Feed-forward control of hysteretic systems is a challenging task due to the hysteresis nonlinearity. Hysteresis models are utilized not only for identification, but also for hysteresis control. The feed-forward control, which is not an error-based (feedback-based) algorithm, plays a significant role in hysteresis control problems. Instead, it works based on knowledge about the process in the form of a mathematical model of the process. In feed-forward control problems, it is important to identify the inverse relationship of the output and input of the system, i.e., determining the mapping of the output and input of the system plays a key role in feed-forward controlling. This paper presents a new feed-forward controller model to control an actuator in a laboratory to tackle the restrictions of feedback control systems. For this purpose, first, a numerical model of a Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID)-controlled actuator was created, and sets of numerical data of inputs and outputs of the plant were generated. Then, a least-squares support-vector machine (LS-SVM) hysteresis model was trained inversely on the generated data sets of the numerical modeling. Afterwards, to examine the efficacy of the proposed method for real-world hydraulic actuators in the presence of experimental errors and noise, sets of experimental data were obtained from physical modeling at KNTU’s Structural and Earthquake Engineering Laboratory (KSEEL). The results indicate the high performance of the proposed model.

[1]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[2]  Magdy A.S. Aboelela,et al.  Position control of hydraulic servo system using proportional-integral-derivative controller tuned by some evolutionary techniques , 2016 .

[3]  Johan A. K. Suykens,et al.  Coupled Simulated Annealing , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[4]  Mojtaba Farrokh,et al.  Neuro-hybrid simulation of non-linear frames using Prandtl neural networks , 2019 .

[5]  In-Beum Lee,et al.  Limitations and Countermeasures of PID Controllers , 1996 .

[6]  S. Devasia,et al.  Feedforward control of piezoactuators in atomic force microscope systems , 2009, IEEE Control Systems.

[7]  M. Ahmadizadeh,et al.  On equivalent passive structural control systems for semi‐active control using viscous fluid dampers , 2007 .

[8]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  Variable structure methods in hydraulic servo systems control , 2001, Autom..

[9]  R. Vilanova,et al.  A refinement procedure for PID controller tuning , 2002 .

[10]  Johan A. K. Suykens,et al.  Least Squares Support Vector Machine Classifiers , 1999, Neural Processing Letters.

[11]  A. J. Calderón,et al.  Fractional PID Controllers for Industry Application. A Brief Introduction , 2007 .

[12]  James E. Bobrow,et al.  Experiments and simulations on the nonlinear control of a hydraulic servosystem , 1999, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[13]  Hysteresis Simulation Using Least-Squares Support Vector Machine , 2018, Journal of Engineering Mechanics.

[14]  Amin Maghareh,et al.  Parametric identification of a servo-hydraulic actuator for real-time hybrid simulation , 2014 .

[15]  Wudhichai Assawinchaichote,et al.  PID Controller Design for Electro-hydraulic Servo Valve System with Genetic Algorithm☆ , 2016 .

[16]  Rey-Chue Hwang,et al.  A multivariable on-line adaptive PID controller using auto-tuning neurons , 2003 .

[17]  Abdolreza Joghataie,et al.  Dynamic Analysis of Nonlinear Frames by Prandtl Neural Networks , 2008 .