Optimizing observations of drizzle onset with millimeter-wavelength radars

Abstract. Cloud Doppler radars are increasingly used to study cloud and precipitation microphysical processes. Typical bulk cloud properties such as liquid or ice content are usually derived using the first three standard moments of the radar Doppler spectrum. Recent studies demonstrated the value of higher moments for the reduction of retrieval uncertainties and for providing additional insights into microphysical processes. Large effort has been undertaken, e.g., within the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program to ensure high quality of radar Doppler spectra. However, a systematic approach concerning the accuracy of higher moment estimates and sensitivity to basic radar system settings, such as spectral resolution, integration time and beam width, are still missing. In this study, we present an approach on how to optimize radar settings for radar Doppler spectra moments in the specific context of drizzle detection. The process of drizzle development has shown to be particularly sensitive to higher radar moments such as skewness. We collected radar raw data (I/Q time series) from consecutive zenith-pointing observations for two liquid cloud cases observed at the cloud observatory JOYCE in Germany. The I/Q data allowed us to process Doppler spectra and derive their moments using different spectral resolutions and integration times during identical time intervals. This enabled us to study the sensitivity of the spatiotemporal structure of the derived moments to the different radar settings. The observed signatures were further investigated using a radar Doppler forward model which allowed us to compare observed and simulated sensitivities and also to study the impact of additional hardware-dependent parameters such as antenna beam width. For the observed cloud with drizzle onset we found that longer integration times mainly modify spectral width (Sw) and skewness (Sk), leaving other moments mostly unaffected. An integration time of 2 s seems to be an optimal compromise: both observations and simulations revealed that a 10 s integration time – as it is widely used for European cloud radars – leads to a significant turbulence-induced increase of Sw and reduction of Sk compared to 2 s integration time. This can lead to significantly different microphysical interpretations with respect to drizzle water content and effective radius. A change from 2 s to even shorter integration times (0. 4 s) has much smaller effects on Sw and Sk. We also find that spectral resolution has a small impact on the moment estimations, and thus on the microphysical interpretation of the drizzle signal. Even the coarsest spectral resolution studied, 0. 08 ms−1, seems to be appropriate for calculation moments of drizzling clouds. Moreover, simulations provided additional insight into the microphysical interpretation of the skewness signatures observed: in low (high)-turbulence conditions, only drizzle larger than 20 µm (40 µm) can generate Sk values above the Sk noise level (in our case 0.4). Higher Sk values are also obtained in simulations when smaller beam widths are adopted.

[1]  G. Mie Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metallösungen , 1908 .

[2]  E. Clothiaux,et al.  Cloud Droplet Size Distributions in Low-Level Stratiform Clouds , 2000 .

[3]  Earl E. Gossard,et al.  Measurement of Cloud Droplet Size Spectra by Doppler Radar , 1994 .

[4]  Pavlos Kollias,et al.  Cloud radar Doppler spectra in drizzling stratiform clouds: 1. Forward modeling and remote sensing applications , 2011 .

[5]  Gerhard Peters,et al.  A 35-GHz Polarimetric Doppler Radar for Long-Term Observations of Cloud Parameters—Description of System and Data Processing , 2015 .

[6]  P. Hildebrand,et al.  Objective Determination of the Noise Level in Doppler Spectra , 1974 .

[7]  J. Curry,et al.  Terminal Velocities of Droplets and Crystals: Power Laws with Continuous Parameters over the Size Spectrum , 2002 .

[8]  Pavlos Kollias,et al.  Separating Cloud and Drizzle Radar Moments during Precipitation Onset Using Doppler Spectra , 2013 .

[9]  Oleg A. Krasnov,et al.  Continuous Evaluation of Cloud Profiles in Seven Operational Models Using Ground-Based Observations , 2007 .

[10]  D. Zrnic,et al.  Doppler Radar and Weather Observations , 1984 .

[11]  Susanne Crewell,et al.  A multisensor approach toward a better understanding of snowfall microphysics the tosca project , 2011 .

[12]  E. Luke,et al.  On the unified estimation of turbulence eddy dissipation rate using Doppler cloud radars and lidars , 2016 .

[13]  Pavlos Kollias,et al.  Cloud radar Doppler spectra in drizzling stratiform clouds: 2. Observations and microphysical modeling of drizzle evolution , 2011 .

[14]  Pavlos Kollias,et al.  Radar Observations of Updrafts, Downdrafts, and Turbulence in Fair-Weather Cumuli , 2001 .

[15]  Pavlos Kollias,et al.  Millimeter-Wavelength Radars: New Frontier in Atmospheric Cloud and Precipitation Research , 2007 .

[16]  E. Clothiaux,et al.  Arctic multilayered, mixed‐phase cloud processes revealed in millimeter‐wave cloud radar Doppler spectra , 2013 .

[17]  C. Fairall,et al.  Measurement of Stratus Cloud and Drizzle Parameters in ASTEX with a K , 1995 .

[18]  Robin J. Hogan,et al.  Retrieving Stratocumulus Drizzle Parameters Using Doppler Radar and Lidar , 2005 .

[19]  Simone Tanelli,et al.  Evaluation of EarthCARE Cloud Profiling Radar Doppler Velocity Measurements in Particle Sedimentation Regimes , 2014 .

[20]  R. C. Srivastava,et al.  Doppler radar characteristics of precipitation at vertical incidence , 1973 .

[21]  The Effect of Radar Pulse Length on Cloud Reflectivity Statistics , 2001 .

[22]  H. Kalesse,et al.  Fingerprints of a riming event on cloud radar Doppler spectra: observations and modeling , 2015 .

[23]  E. Clothiaux,et al.  The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Cloud Profiling Radars: An Evaluation of Signal Processing and Sampling Strategies , 2005 .

[24]  Maximilian Maahn,et al.  Potential of Higher-Order Moments and Slopes of the Radar Doppler Spectrum for Retrieving Microphysical and Kinematic Properties of Arctic Ice Clouds , 2017 .

[25]  E. Clothiaux,et al.  Development and Applications of ARM Millimeter-Wavelength Cloud Radars , 2016 .

[26]  E. Clothiaux,et al.  The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Cloud Profiling Radars: Second-Generation Sampling Strategies, Processing, and Cloud Data Products , 2007 .

[27]  E. Clothiaux,et al.  The Potential of 8-mm Radars for Remotely Sensing Cloud Drop Size Distributions , 1997 .

[28]  Alessandro Battaglia,et al.  Dual‐frequency radar Doppler spectral retrieval of rain drop size distributions and entangled dynamics variables , 2015 .

[29]  Pavlos Kollias,et al.  Developing and Evaluating Ice Cloud Parameterizations for Forward Modeling of Radar Moments Using in situ Aircraft Observations , 2015 .

[30]  Dusan S. Zrnic,et al.  Simulation of Weatherlike Doppler Spectra and Signals , 1975 .

[31]  M. Maahn Exploiting vertically pointing Doppler radar for advancing snow and ice cloud observations , 2015 .

[32]  Clemens Simmer,et al.  JOYCE: Jülich Observatory for cloud evolution , 2015 .

[33]  P. Kollias,et al.  Deriving Mixed-Phase Cloud Properties from Doppler Radar Spectra , 2004 .