pH‐Activated Near‐Infrared Fluorescence Nanoprobe Imaging Tumors by Sensing the Acidic Microenvironment

Imaging tumors in their early stages is crucial to increase the surviving rate of cancer patients. Currently most fluorescence probes visualize the neoplasia by targeting the tumor-associated receptor over-expressed on the cancer cell membrane. However, the expression level of these receptors in vivo is hard to predict, which limits their clinical translation. Furthermore, the signal output of these receptor-targeting probes usually stays at a high level, which leads to a strong background signal in normal tissue due to non-specific binding. In contrast to receptors, characteristics of the tumor microenvironment – such as acidosis – are pervasive in almost all solid tumors and can be easily accessed. In this work, a novel biodegradable nanoprobe InNP1 that demonstrates pH-activated near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence in both human glioblastoma U87MG cancer cells in vitro and the subcutaneous U87MG tumor xenografts in vivo is developed. Bio-distribution, in vivo optical imaging, and autoradiography studies demonstrate that the pH-activated NIR fluorescence is the dominant factor responsible for the high tumor/normal tissue (T/N) ratio of InNP1 in vivo. Overall, the work provides a nanoprobe prototype to visualize the solid tumor in vivo with high sensitivity and minimal systemic toxicity by sensing the tumor acidic microenvironment.

[1]  R. Weissleder,et al.  In vivo imaging of tumors with protease-activated near-infrared fluorescent probes , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  Z. Bhujwalla,et al.  Conjugation of poly-L-lysine to bacterial cytosine deaminase improves the efficacy of enzyme/prodrug cancer therapy. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  G. Fan,et al.  Usefulness of diffusion/perfusion-weighted MRI in rat gliomas: correlation with histopathology. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[4]  Ralph Weissleder,et al.  Near-infrared fluorescence: application to in vivo molecular imaging. , 2010, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[5]  P. Low,et al.  Ligand Binding and Kinetics of Folate Receptor Recycling in Vivo: Impact on Receptor-Mediated Drug Delivery , 2004, Molecular Pharmacology.

[6]  A. Maitra,et al.  Tumour targeted delivery of encapsulated dextran-doxorubicin conjugate using chitosan nanoparticles as carrier. , 2001, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[7]  H. Maeda,et al.  Exploiting the enhanced permeability and retention effect for tumor targeting. , 2006, Drug discovery today.

[8]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Tomographic fluorescence mapping of tumor targets. , 2005, Cancer research.

[9]  R. Gillies,et al.  Responsive MRI agents for sensing metabolism in vivo. , 2009, Accounts of chemical research.

[10]  N. A. Golubeva,et al.  pH dependence of fluorescence and absorbance spectra of free sulphonated aluminium phthalocyanine and its conjugate with monoclonal antibodies. , 1992, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[11]  Cong Li,et al.  Glucosamine-bound near-infrared fluorescent probes with lysosomal specificity for breast tumor imaging. , 2008, Neoplasia.

[12]  Samuel Achilefu,et al.  Biodegradable pH-sensing dendritic nanoprobes for near-infrared fluorescence lifetime and intensity imaging. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  Giovanna Pitarresi,et al.  Biodegradable and pH-sensitive hydrogels for potential colon-specific drug delivery: characterization and in vitro release studies. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[14]  M. Solaiyappan,et al.  Extracellular acidification alters lysosomal trafficking in human breast cancer cells. , 2003, Neoplasia.

[15]  R. Gillies,et al.  Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[16]  S. Silbernagl,et al.  Evidence for an acid pH in rat renal inner medulla: paired measurements with liquid ion-exchange microelectrodes on collecting ducts and vasa recta , 1994, Pflügers Archiv.

[17]  S. Hanash,et al.  In-depth proteomics to define the cell surface and secretome of ovarian cancer cells and processes of protein shedding. , 2009, Cancer research.

[18]  Dextran based pH-activated near-infrared fluorescence nanoprobe imaging the acidic compartments in cancer cells. , 2010, Chemical communications.

[19]  H. Kessler,et al.  Ligands for mapping alphavbeta3-integrin expression in vivo. , 2009, Accounts of chemical research.

[20]  Kristine Glunde,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of glucosamine-bound near-infrared probes for optical imaging. , 2006, Organic letters.

[21]  G. Milligan,et al.  A pH-sensitive fluor, CypHer 5, used to monitor agonist-induced G protein-coupled receptor internalization in live cells. , 2002, BioTechniques.

[22]  R Y Tsien,et al.  Na+-H+ exchange in gastric glands as measured with a cytoplasmic-trapped, fluorescent pH indicator. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Anthony Fyles,et al.  Interstitial fluid pressure in tumors: therapeutic barrier and biomarker of angiogenesis. , 2008, Future oncology.

[24]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Fluorescence probe with a pH-sensitive trigger. , 2006, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[25]  R. Tsien,et al.  Creating new fluorescent probes for cell biology , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[26]  M. Conese,et al.  Role of clathrin- and caveolae-mediated endocytosis in gene transfer mediated by lipo- and polyplexes. , 2005, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[27]  J. Golenser,et al.  Impact of aldehyde content on amphotericin B-dextran imine conjugate toxicity. , 2006, Biomacromolecules.

[28]  S. Achilefu,et al.  Design, synthesis and evaluation of near-infrared fluorescent pH indicators in a physiologically relevant range. , 2005, Chemical communications.

[29]  M. Xie,et al.  Preparation of tea glycoprotein and its application as a calibration standard for the quantification and molecular weight determination of tea glycoprotein in different tea samples by high-performance gel-permeation chromatography , 2005, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[30]  R. Moats,et al.  In vivo Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging of Integrin αvβ3 in Brain Tumor Xenografts , 2004, Cancer Research.

[31]  Tristan Barrett,et al.  Selective molecular imaging of viable cancer cells with pH-activatable fluorescence probes , 2009, Nature Medicine.

[32]  Francesco M Veronese,et al.  PEGylation, successful approach to drug delivery. , 2005, Drug discovery today.

[33]  Robert Langer,et al.  Nanoparticle–aptamer bioconjugates for cancer targeting , 2006, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[34]  N. Denko,et al.  Hypoxia, HIF1 and glucose metabolism in the solid tumour , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[35]  Philip S Low,et al.  Discovery and development of folic-acid-based receptor targeting for imaging and therapy of cancer and inflammatory diseases. , 2008, Accounts of chemical research.

[36]  P. Choyke,et al.  Design, synthesis, and characterization of a dual modality positron emission tomography and fluorescence imaging agent for monoclonal antibody tumor-targeted imaging. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[37]  L. Lilge,et al.  In vivo quantification of fluorescent molecular markers in real‐time by ratio imaging for diagnostic screening and image‐guided surgery , 2007, Lasers in surgery and medicine.