Utility of Climatic Information via Combining Ability Models to Improve Genomic Prediction for Yield Within the Genomes to Fields Maize Project

Genomic prediction provides an efficient alternative to conventional phenotypic selection for developing improved cultivars with desirable characteristics. New and improved methods to genomic prediction are continually being developed that attempt to deal with the integration of data types beyond genomic information. Modern automated weather systems offer the opportunity to capture continuous data on a range of environmental parameters at specific field locations. In principle, this information could characterize training and target environments and enhance predictive ability by incorporating weather characteristics as part of the genotype-by-environment (G×E) interaction component in prediction models. We assessed the usefulness of including weather data variables in genomic prediction models using a naïve environmental kinship model across 30 environments comprising the Genomes to Fields (G2F) initiative in 2014 and 2015. Specifically four different prediction scenarios were evaluated (i) tested genotypes in observed environments; (ii) untested genotypes in observed environments; (iii) tested genotypes in unobserved environments; and (iv) untested genotypes in unobserved environments. A set of 1,481 unique hybrids were evaluated for grain yield. Evaluations were conducted using five different models including main effect of environments; general combining ability (GCA) effects of the maternal and paternal parents modeled using the genomic relationship matrix; specific combining ability (SCA) effects between maternal and paternal parents; interactions between genetic (GCA and SCA) effects and environmental effects; and finally interactions between the genetics effects and environmental covariates. Incorporation of the genotype-by-environment interaction term improved predictive ability across all scenarios. However, predictive ability was not improved through inclusion of naive environmental covariates in G×E models. More research should be conducted to link the observed weather conditions with important physiological aspects in plant development to improve predictive ability through the inclusion of weather data.

[1]  Patrick S. Schnable,et al.  Maize genomes to fields (G2F): 2014–2017 field seasons: genotype, phenotype, climatic, soil, and inbred ear image datasets , 2020, BMC Research Notes.

[2]  Alain Charcosset,et al.  Genomic prediction of maize yield across European environmental conditions , 2019, Nature Genetics.

[3]  P. Pérez-Rodríguez,et al.  Hybrid Wheat Prediction Using Genomic, Pedigree, and Environmental Covariables Interaction Models , 2018, The plant genome.

[4]  Patrick S. Schnable,et al.  Maize Genomes to Fields: 2014 and 2015 field season genotype, phenotype, environment, and inbred ear image datasets , 2018, BMC Research Notes.

[5]  Joseph L. Gage,et al.  The effect of artificial selection on phenotypic plasticity in maize , 2017, Nature Communications.

[6]  G. de los Campos,et al.  Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: Methods, Models, and Perspectives. , 2017, Trends in plant science.

[7]  V. Allard,et al.  Optimization of multi-environment trials for genomic selection based on crop models , 2017, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[8]  G. de los Campos,et al.  Genomic models with genotype × environment interaction for predicting hybrid performance: an application in maize hybrids , 2017, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[9]  G. de los Campos,et al.  Genotype by environment (climate) interaction improves genomic prediction for production traits in US Holstein cattle. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  M. Bohn,et al.  Genomic Prediction of Single Crosses in the Early Stages of a Maize Hybrid Breeding Pipeline , 2016, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[11]  Fred A. van Eeuwijk,et al.  Predicting responses in multiple environments : Issues in relation to genotype × Environment interactions , 2016 .

[12]  M. Quincke,et al.  Modeling Genotype × Environment Interaction for Genomic Selection with Unbalanced Data from a Wheat Breeding Program , 2016 .

[13]  Osval A. Montesinos-López,et al.  A Genomic Bayesian Multi-trait and Multi-environment Model , 2016, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[14]  Takeshi Hayashi,et al.  Toward integration of genomic selection with crop modelling: the development of an integrated approach to predicting rice heading dates , 2016, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[15]  P. Pérez-Rodríguez,et al.  A Pedigree‐Based Reaction Norm Model for Prediction of Cotton Yield in Multienvironment Trials , 2015 .

[16]  Sarah Hearne,et al.  Novel Methods to Optimize Genotypic Imputation for Low‐Coverage, Next‐Generation Sequence Data in Crop Plants , 2014 .

[17]  George Graef,et al.  Genotyping by sequencing for genomic prediction in a soybean breeding population , 2014, BMC Genomics.

[18]  Eva Bauer,et al.  Genome Properties and Prospects of Genomic Prediction of Hybrid Performance in a Breeding Program of Maize , 2014, Genetics.

[19]  Robert J. Elshire,et al.  TASSEL-GBS: A High Capacity Genotyping by Sequencing Analysis Pipeline , 2014, PloS one.

[20]  Deniz Akdemir,et al.  Integrating environmental covariates and crop modeling into the genomic selection framework to predict genotype by environment interactions , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[21]  José Crossa,et al.  A reaction norm model for genomic selection using high-dimensional genomic and environmental data , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[22]  José Crossa,et al.  Genomic Prediction of Breeding Values when Modeling Genotype × Environment Interaction using Pedigree and Dense Molecular Markers , 2012 .

[23]  Robert J. Elshire,et al.  A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species , 2011, PloS one.

[24]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  M. Mikel Availability and Analysis of Proprietary Dent Corn Inbred Lines with Expired U.S. Plant Variety Protection , 2006 .

[26]  A. Melchinger,et al.  Optimum prediction of three-way crosses from single crosses in forage maize (Zea mays L.) , 1987, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[27]  Elizabeth A. Lee,et al.  Corn Inbred Line CG102 , 2001 .

[28]  A. Melchinger,et al.  Overview of Heterosis and Heterotic Groups in Agronomic Crops , 1998 .

[29]  R. Bernardo Prediction of maize single-cross performance using RFLPs and information from related hybrids , 1994 .