Towards Evaluating the Benefits of Inter-vehicle Coordination

While vehicle automation has the potential to significantly improve safety and traffic efficiency, the full potential will only be realised when vehicles start exploiting wireless communication to cooperate with each other and coordinate their interactions in advance. Ensuring that vehicles coordinate safely while improving efficiency is, however, a very challenging problem as it depends on (i) the characteristics of individual vehicles (vehicle physics, sensors), (ii) unreliable wireless communication, and (iii) driving behaviour at a microscopic level, and their compounded effects at scale. The presence of non-communicative, non-automated vehicles must also be considered. Designing and evaluating coordination protocols requires a scalable simulation framework that is accurate both microscopically (to assess safety) and macroscopically (to evaluate efficiency). Standard car-following models, where position and velocity are dictated by local input stimuli, produce sometimes unrealistic behaviour when laterally changing position, and lack support for additional inputs. Furthermore, conventional environments used to model traffic flow are either too fine-grained to scale or too coarse to appropriately simulate control logic. This paper introduces RoundaSim consisting of (i) a traffic simulator using a novel approach of mixed discrete-continuous modes of time, and (ii) a framework for implementing car-following models that supports lane-changing and coordination protocols, with additional inputs from advanced sensors and wireless communications. We show how our framework can be used to implement and evaluate a car-following model with lane changes and validate that the traffic flow achieved approximates that of real-world highways. This allows our platform to be used as a baseline for evaluating the safety and efficiency of coordination protocols.

[1]  R. E. Wilson,et al.  An analysis of Gipps's car-following model of highway traffic , 2001 .

[2]  Robbert van Renesse,et al.  Scalable Wireless Ad Hoc Network Simulation , 2005, Handbook on Theoretical and Algorithmic Aspects of Sensor, Ad Hoc Wireless, and Peer-to-Peer Networks.

[3]  Daniel Krajzewicz,et al.  SUMO - Simulation of Urban MObility An Overview , 2011 .

[4]  Vinny Cahill,et al.  Real-time coordination of autonomous vehicles , 2006, 2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference.

[5]  Vinny Cahill,et al.  A reliable membership service for vehicular safety applications , 2011, 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[6]  Helbing,et al.  Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[7]  Bhakthavathsalam Ramaswamy,et al.  Expediency of penetration ratio and evaluation of mean throughput for safety and commercial applications in VANETs , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Ultra Modern Telecommunications & Workshops.

[8]  José Eugenio Naranjo,et al.  Lane-Change Fuzzy Control in Autonomous Vehicles for the Overtaking Maneuver , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[9]  R. Bours,et al.  Development tools for active safety systems: Prescan and VeHIL , 2010, Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety.

[10]  R Wiedemann,et al.  MODELLING OF RTI-ELEMENTS ON MULTI-LANE ROADS , 1991 .

[11]  Peter Vortisch,et al.  VALIDATION OF THE MICROSCOPIC TRAFFIC FLOW MODEL VISSIM IN DIFFERENT REAL-WORLD SITUATIONS , 2001 .

[12]  Hussein Dia,et al.  Comparative evaluation of microscopic car-following behavior , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[13]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  General Lane-Changing Model MOBIL for Car-Following Models , 2007 .

[14]  Andreas Pitsillides,et al.  Speed Adaptive Probabilistic Flooding for vehicular ad-hoc networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[15]  Marcello Montanino,et al.  Do We Really Need to Calibrate All the Parameters? Variance-Based Sensitivity Analysis to Simplify Microscopic Traffic Flow Models , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.