A Framework for the Study of Relationships between Organizational Characteristics and Organizational Innovation.

This paper presents a taxonomy of organizational characteristics that was developed as part of a large scale job analysis project conducted for the Department of Labor (DOL). Based on research and theory related to organizations, a hierarchical taxonomy of organizational characteristics was developed with six construct domains at the highest level: organizational structure, leadership, human resources (HR) systems and practices, goals, and organizational values. The taxonomy has been empirically tested using data from over 300 organizations, and a summary of these results is presented. This taxonomy is then used to organize and review research on the relationships between organizational variables and innovation. Implications of the taxonomy for understanding relationships between organizational size, industry type, “high-performance” practices, and innovation are discussed.

[1]  M. Aiken,et al.  The Organic Organization and Innovation , 1971 .

[2]  Lawrence B. Mohr.  The Concept of Organizational Goal , 1973, American Political Science Review.

[3]  D. Vollrath,et al.  Employee Participation: Diverse Forms and Different Outcomes , 1988 .

[4]  E. Gross,et al.  The Definition of Organizational Goals , 1969 .

[5]  J. Child.  Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[6]  Miriam Erez,et al.  Feedback: A necessary condition for the goal setting-performance relationship. , 1976 .

[7]  D. Pugh,et al.  Dimensions of Organization Structure , 1968 .

[8]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .

[9]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: A PROFILE COMPARISON APPROACH TO ASSESSING PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT , 1991 .

[10]  J. Komaki,et al.  The role of performance antecedents and consequences in work motivation. , 1982 .

[11]  M. Moch,et al.  Size, Centralization and Organizational Adoption of Innovations , 1977 .

[12]  D. R. Dalton,et al.  Organization Structure and Performance: A Critical Review , 1980 .

[13]  J. Hage,et al.  Program Change and Organizational Properties a Comparative Analysis , 1967, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Charles Perrow,et al.  THE ANALYSIS OF GOALS IN COMPLEX ORGANIZATIONS , 1961 .

[15]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[16]  M. Moch,et al.  Structure and organizational resource allocation. , 1976, Administrative science quarterly.

[17]  E. A. Locke.  Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives , 1968 .

[18]  F. M. Andrews,et al.  SUPERVISORY PRACTICES AND INNOVATION IN SCIENTIFIC TEAMS , 1967 .

[19]  A. Bandura,et al.  Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. , 1983 .

[20]  L. Bailyn.  Autonomy in the industrial R&D lab , 1985 .

[21]  R. Duncan.  What is the right organization structure? Decision tree analysis provides the answer , 1979 .